 |
| Author |
Message |
|
12evanf
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:19 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am Posts: 1699
|
SmokinHawk wrote: 12evanf wrote: SmokinHawk wrote: Lobbyists get paid. You're just an idealist. And an idiot. An idiotic idealist. No, I'm a fairly intelligent idealist that promotes civic intelligence to solve problems. You are a big, fat loud mouth that shoots from the hip. What you propose are fallacious scenarios that wouldn't work even in fairy tales. New York just passed something I highly endorse. Maybe you need to wake the fuck up.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SeAhAwKeR4life
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:24 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 2:43 pm Posts: 3941 Location: Blyn, WA
|
kidhawk wrote: Just like banning guns will lower the murder rate by firearm. Of course the difference is that people who stop drinking and driving because alcohol is illegal won't look for other ways to accidentally kill someone. Some people without guns will still find ways to kill someone. And, as usual, you're wrong again. Yes, if someone wants to murder they may find another way, but murder and suicide are more likely, and by a fairly large percentage, when a gun is easily accessible. People will much quicker use a gun to kill themself or another than by other means, it's a simple fact. The less personal, the easier it is to do and keep your "hands clean", the easier it is for someone to do. I am not an advocate of banning guns, but a gun ban would reduce murder rates dramatically.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
12evanf
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:29 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am Posts: 1699
|
SeAhAwKeR4life wrote: kidhawk wrote: Just like banning guns will lower the murder rate by firearm. Of course the difference is that people who stop drinking and driving because alcohol is illegal won't look for other ways to accidentally kill someone. Some people without guns will still find ways to kill someone. And, as usual, you're wrong again. Yes, if someone wants to murder they may find another way, but murder and suicide are more likely, and by a fairly large percentage, when a gun is easily accessible. People will much quicker use a gun to kill themself or another than by other means, it's a simple fact. The less personal, the easier it is to do and keep your "hands clean", the easier it is for someone to do. I am not an advocate of banning guns, but a gun ban would reduce murder rates dramatically. This is where kidhawk comes in and reads your mind. He will then let you know you are a Nazi 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:31 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10256 Location: Anchorage, AK
|
SeAhAwKeR4life wrote: kidhawk wrote: Just like banning guns will lower the murder rate by firearm. Of course the difference is that people who stop drinking and driving because alcohol is illegal won't look for other ways to accidentally kill someone. Some people without guns will still find ways to kill someone. And, as usual, you're wrong again. Yes, if someone wants to murder they may find another way, but murder and suicide are more likely, and by a fairly large percentage, when a gun is easily accessible. People will much quicker use a gun to kill themself or another than by other means, it's a simple fact. The less personal, the easier it is to do and keep your "hands clean", the easier it is for someone to do. I am not an advocate of banning guns, but a gun ban would reduce murder rates dramatically. Of the 38,000 suicides in this country, approximately 19,000 are done by a means other than firearms. So seriously, get with the facts. Also, how many suicides are committed with the assault rifle they are talking about banning? I'm betting VERY VERY few. Handguns commit by FAR the majority of suicide by firearms in this country, but those aren't being banned, so your argument is what's wrong here.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:32 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10256 Location: Anchorage, AK
|
12evanf wrote: SeAhAwKeR4life wrote: kidhawk wrote: Just like banning guns will lower the murder rate by firearm. Of course the difference is that people who stop drinking and driving because alcohol is illegal won't look for other ways to accidentally kill someone. Some people without guns will still find ways to kill someone. And, as usual, you're wrong again. Yes, if someone wants to murder they may find another way, but murder and suicide are more likely, and by a fairly large percentage, when a gun is easily accessible. People will much quicker use a gun to kill themself or another than by other means, it's a simple fact. The less personal, the easier it is to do and keep your "hands clean", the easier it is for someone to do. I am not an advocate of banning guns, but a gun ban would reduce murder rates dramatically. This is where kidhawk comes in and reads your mind. He will then let you know you are a Nazi  Guilt complex? I never called YOU a nazi.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:42 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6605
|
|
Hasn't stricter DUI laws dropped such deaths by over 90% the past 40 years or so?
Or, maybe I'm misreading this rube's point?
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
12evanf
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:47 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am Posts: 1699
|
kidhawk wrote: 12evanf wrote: This is where kidhawk comes in and reads your mind. He will then let you know you are a Nazi  Guilt complex? I never called YOU a nazi. Page 23 of this thread. kidhawk wrote: you, like the rest of the gun control Nazis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:49 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6605
|
12evanf wrote: kidhawk wrote: 12evanf wrote: This is where kidhawk comes in and reads your mind. He will then let you know you are a Nazi  Guilt complex? I never called YOU a nazi. Page 23 of this thread. kidhawk wrote: you, like the rest of the gun control Nazis You should've made him bet $100 to charity first.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:55 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10256 Location: Anchorage, AK
|
12evanf wrote: kidhawk wrote: 12evanf wrote: This is where kidhawk comes in and reads your mind. He will then let you know you are a Nazi  Guilt complex? I never called YOU a nazi. Page 23 of this thread. kidhawk wrote: you, like the rest of the gun control Nazis Exactly as I said, I didn't call you a Nazi, just compared you to them, and more precisely to "gun control nazi" more a turn of phrase than the political party. Another point of difference you seem to be having trouble with in this thread
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
12evanf
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am Posts: 1699
|
|
Actually the way you worded it with the phrase "the rest of the gun Nazis" is including me in the statement. You didn't say I was like "A" gun Nazi, rather I am like "the rest of them" where they are not complete without my inclusion. So again you're wrong
I can start a game where I compare you to things if you like, though.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SmokinHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:01 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am Posts: 4724 Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
|
12evanf wrote: SmokinHawk wrote: What you propose are fallacious scenarios that wouldn't work even in fairy tales. New York just passed something I highly endorse. Maybe you need to wake the fuck up. Good for you and New York. History indicates it won't do a lick of good, but good for you and New York. Perhaps you should go live there instead of trying to foist your idealism on the rest of the union. I don't agree with their law but I do believe in the 10th Amendment and appreciate that each state can have regional differences in law.
_________________ Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro
He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:13 pm |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am Posts: 16247 Location: Bothell
|
12evanf wrote: I really like New York's new laws, would like to see them be the Federal standard. As for gun advocates, a lot of really, really, really bad apples spoiled the pot. This is why you can't have nice things. 12evanf wrote: Remember earlier where I said banning is stupid because it leads to higher illegal sales. This is where you apply that statement to both my position on guns and spirits. Regulation works better. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but didn't New York just ban a bunch of types of guns, certain capacity clips/magazines, etc.? New York, Washington D.C., and Chicago already have the strictest gun laws in the United States. I suppose that's why everyone is following suit with their kind of gun bans and laws. They want the same violent crime statistics.
_________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
12evanf
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am Posts: 1699
|
Seahawk Sailor wrote: 12evanf wrote: I really like New York's new laws, would like to see them be the Federal standard. As for gun advocates, a lot of really, really, really bad apples spoiled the pot. This is why you can't have nice things. 12evanf wrote: Remember earlier where I said banning is stupid because it leads to higher illegal sales. This is where you apply that statement to both my position on guns and spirits. Regulation works better. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but didn't New York just ban a bunch of types of guns, certain capacity clips/magazines, etc.? New York, Washington D.C., and Chicago already have the strictest gun laws in the United States. I suppose that's why everyone is following suit with their kind of gun bans and laws. They want the same violent crime statistics. That's the part of the bill that will do the least amount of good, IMO. Especially in New York, organized crime just increased its market. Assault rifles have been a side show, most murders are committed with hand guns. More background checks, less ammunition, increased sentences, but most important the authority for a therapist to turn in someone mentally ill and dangerous if they own a gun, those are the reasons I like this bill. The last one already is the most contentious, but I'll be damned if it doesn't save lives. These are measures that will actually effect gun violence. I know, I know, one of you will argue that all this does is take away the rights of law abiding citizens. If that were true this wouldn't have happened. People wanted to be treated like adults and play with their guns like adults. Well guess what? You guys fucked up. For a long time have been fucking up and now Mom and Dad are taking some of your toys away.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SmokinHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:21 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am Posts: 4724 Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
|
12evanf wrote: That's the part of the bill that will do the least amount of good, IMO. Especially in New York, organized crime just increased its market. Assault rifles have been a side show, most murders are committed with hand guns. More background checks, less ammunition, increased sentences, but most important the authority for a therapist to turn in someone mentally ill and dangerous if they own a gun, those are the reasons I like this bill. The last one already is the most contentious, but I'll be damned if it doesn't save lives. These are measures that will actually effect gun violence.
I know, I know, one of you will argue that all this does is take away the rights of law abiding citizens. If that were true this wouldn't have happened. People wanted to be treated like adults and play with their guns like adults. Well guess what? You guys fucked up. For a long time have been fucking up and now Mom and Dad are taking some of your toys away. EXCUSE ME? I am the one who fucked up? Fuck you, you pretentious fucking child. How fucking dare you lump the vast majority of gun owners, myself included, people who are responsible with their weapons, with the likes of the few fuckheads who perform rampage killings? It is the actions of a minority of a minority that you are allowing to color your weak, short sighted perspective. It's assholes like YOU who are going to fuck things up royally for the rest of us as you parrot the fallacious claims spoon fed to you mindless automatons, by the mass media, in spite of the fact there is no factual basis to your beliefs. Bravo, you fucking twat. Bravo. Go watch more MTV, enjoy your reality television, and continue to live in your idealistic little dream world.
_________________ Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro
He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:31 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am Posts: 9688
|
12evanf wrote: I know, I know, one of you will argue that all this does is take away the rights of law abiding citizens. If that were true this wouldn't have happened. People wanted to be treated like adults and play with their guns like adults. Well guess what? You guys fucked up. For a long time have been fucking up and now Mom and Dad are taking some of your toys away. Unfortunately for people like you, the people who made this country had such a healthy mistrust of central government that one of the first things they built into the Constitution was that it couldn't disarm its citizens. Your "fix" will only create an even bigger problem - citizens defenseless against criminals (funny how few stories of armed defense in the home don't go reported by the media) and against the government. If Obama wants to start forcing things down our throat and tempt the House to impeach him, that's his business. But he's testing the very American spirit by doing this, and your lumping responsible gun owners in with lunatics like the Newtown shooter only proves that it's not being done with the proper perspective.
_________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:46 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10256 Location: Anchorage, AK
|
12evanf wrote: Actually the way you worded it with the phrase "the rest of the gun Nazis" is including me in the statement. You didn't say I was like "A" gun Nazi, rather I am like "the rest of them" where they are not complete without my inclusion. So again you're wrong
I can start a game where I compare you to things if you like, though. The word "like" means it's a comparison. you can play grammar nazi with the sentence if you want (notice I didn't call you a grammar nazi), just like in the other sentence, I said you were "similar" to the rest of gun control "nazis".....even if you say I'm including you, it's still not calling you a nazi, it's calling you a "gun control nazi" not the same thing, just as being a grammar nazi is not the same thing. Of course I'm sure this will fly right over your head as well as any other logical statement seems to in this thread
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
redeye81
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:58 pm Posts: 1165 Location: Boise
|
|
Prohibition was not the answer.. TAX THE SHIT OUT OF IT..weed out the unwilling..
I say we take the NRA up with their offer. There is about 50 million household with guns in america (including mine).. With that power creates great responsibility.. Anyone with guns should pay say $1000 per year to arm our schools. That money goes to protect our children at EVERY school in america.. 50millon times $1000 dollar i bet we can afford it.. I am willing to pay to protect my kids..It's either all or nothing..
This money goes to pay for armed guards in EVERY school.. The gun companies can donate the guns (I am sure they won't mind).. If you don't want to pay turn in your gun.. Simple as that.. your choice.. Doing nothing is NOT an option..
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm Posts: 2358
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: 12evanf wrote: I know, I know, one of you will argue that all this does is take away the rights of law abiding citizens. If that were true this wouldn't have happened. People wanted to be treated like adults and play with their guns like adults. Well guess what? You guys fucked up. For a long time have been fucking up and now Mom and Dad are taking some of your toys away. Unfortunately for people like you, the people who made this country had such a healthy mistrust of central government that one of the first things they built into the Constitution was that it couldn't disarm its citizens. Your "fix" will only create an even bigger problem - citizens defenseless against criminals (funny how few stories of armed defense in the home don't go reported by the media) and against the government. If Obama wants to start forcing things down our throat and tempt the House to impeach him, that's his business. But he's testing the very American spirit by doing this, and your lumping responsible gun owners in with lunatics like the Newtown shooter only proves that it's not being done with the proper perspective. I would find odd that you would think the people who made this country mistrusted central government so much that they created one. Just because you're responsible with a weapon doesn't mean it should be legal. I think I can tell when I can safely drive a car after a few drinks, why won't they get rid of the BAC and just let me, as a responsible adult, decide? The answer is simple. Not all adults are responsible. So how do you as intelligent, responsible adult figure out what to do? We don't make laws for the responsible ones. When I see 11,000 homicides a year by weapons we must look at a way to limit this. The same way we look at drunk driving and speeding deaths. I don't understand why blow and goes aren't standard on vehicles. Let's just circumvent that altogether and have self driving cars? Now that I offered a solution to remove road fatalities... what's your solution for ending firearm deaths? Smart bullets that only hit animals or aggressors? You tell me what's better. Your right to have your weapon or reducing firearm related deaths by 90%+?
_________________ RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:41 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm Posts: 2358
|
redeye81 wrote: Prohibition was not the answer.. TAX THE SHIT OUT OF IT..weed out the unwilling..
I say we take the NRA up with their offer. There is about 50 million household with guns in america (including mine).. With that power creates great responsibility.. Anyone with guns should pay say $1000 per year to arm our schools. That money goes to protect our children at EVERY school in america.. 50millon times $1000 dollar i bet we can afford it.. I am willing to pay to protect my kids..It's either all or nothing..
This money goes to pay for armed guards in EVERY school.. The gun companies can donate the guns (I am sure they won't mind).. If you don't want to pay turn in your gun.. Simple as that.. your choice.. Doing nothing is NOT an option.. Stop trying to put guns in my fucking schools. You think you're going to tax gun owners $1000 per year? Jesus christ, enough of them already think we're a breath away from revolution. Does that mean registering every gun in existence? It's probably the worst idea I've heard yet.
_________________ RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
redeye81
|
Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:58 pm Posts: 1165 Location: Boise
|
|
Well it's an idea..
You don't want to pay??? Then give up your FOOKing gun asshole.. I am sick of hearing 2nd rights with no accountability.. i want my gun I need to pay for ANY measure needed to PROTECT the kids..
ANY OF YOU MF DISAGREE THEN FU!.. Thats Right - My kids mean more than your sorry ass guns rights.. I'll pay $1000 in a heartbeat.. Doing nothing will not do sir!
Some cock sucker wants an AK47... Go ahead.. I don't care but it's going to cost you.. It's simple risk vs reward... With that privilege to have AK47 requires some responsibility. You along with the other cock suckers need to pay to ensure our kids are protected.. Hey man it is what it is.. If I want a A47 i will gladly pay..
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|