That is an abomination on the field right now. Joe Webb, you are an ABOMINATION.

he's ballin

That's harsh. Dude took 3 snaps all season and has to start on the road in the playoffs. This is why, IMO, it's so important that Pete gave Flynn some throws in those blowouts. Hard to go 16 games without throwing at ALL and then start in a situation like this.

I love how he throws at the receivers feet, that's boss right there.

Webb sucks real bad. Ponder might have won this game for the viks.

OkieHawk wrote:I love how he throws at the receivers feet, that's boss right there.

once more for good measure

Okay, those last three throws weren't within a mile of his receiver. He's probably playing legitimately worse than Flynn would play in an identical situation. You guys are right.

Yup GB is being GIFTED a next round game. But no one int he media will see it only that GB is great.

jkitsune wrote:That's harsh. Dude took 3 snaps all season and has to start on the road in the playoffs. This is why, IMO, it's so important that Pete gave Flynn some throws in those blowouts. Hard to go 16 games without throwing at ALL and then start in a situation like this.

Still, put yourself in the Vikings shoes for a moment. Make the playoffs, then Joe Webb screws everything up?

KEEP FLYNN.

Webb is going to heat up in the second half and light it up!!! Or not

With that being said, the Pack isnt looking very scary right now.. unless rodgers has 5-6 seconds

Pstark3 wrote:With that being said, the Pack isnt looking very scary right now.. unless rodgers has 5-6 seconds

You seen our pass rush lately?

They have zero chance . I was just saying thank god we have flynn

hawksfan515 wrote:

Pstark3 wrote:With that being said, the Pack isnt looking very scary right now.. unless rodgers has 5-6 seconds

You seen our pass rush lately?

That shouldn't matter, you already picked us to lose against the Redskins

I didn't see any great qb play in the 1st game either,not much of a game to watch.

Hawkfan77 wrote:

hawksfan515 wrote:

Pstark3 wrote:With that being said, the Pack isnt looking very scary right now.. unless rodgers has 5-6 seconds

You seen our pass rush lately?

That shouldn't matter, you already picked us to lose against the Redskins

You don't have any context though man. So far the Hawks are on a win streak when I pick them to lose..... Not deviating from that till it stops working.

Yes- I dont se any team were scared of so far.

Joe Webb is playing like a QB that hasn't practiced with his teammates at all before the start of the game.

rpmischris wrote:Webb sucks real bad. Ponder might have won this game for the viks.

I seriously doubt that.

Hawkfan77 wrote:

hawksfan515 wrote:

Pstark3 wrote:With that being said, the Pack isnt looking very scary right now.. unless rodgers has 5-6 seconds

You seen our pass rush lately?

That shouldn't matter, you already picked us to lose against the Redskins

EL ZINGO!!

theENGLISHseahawk wrote:

rpmischris wrote:Webb sucks real bad. Ponder might have won this game for the viks.

I seriously doubt that.

Yea, I don't see that either. Vikings look terrible all over the field. Do not look like a playoff team at all.

Not sure if some of you guys realize. A good deal of Vikings fans have been calling for Webb over Ponder for a good portion of the season. He was there popular backup that fans dream is better than their disappointing starter. The Charlie Whitehurst kinda guy that fans foolishly think could be good if he just gets a chance. Just goes to show how stupid and silly that line of thinking always is.

And just because Webb was so woefully unprepared and inadequate, it doesn't mean you have to have a backup the caliber of Matt Flynn. You can have a TJack level backup that's capable of coming in and not crapping all over the place. Teams for ages have had capable game manager backups without having to have a borderline starter as the backup and paying him starter money. I don't see how this Joe Webb deal holds any weight in terms on the Seahawks and Matt Flynn's future.

Good call SeaTown. You don't need a starter in waiting, you just need a Gary Kubiak that can come in and play the same offense you're playing. In fact, those situations are better. I remember when the Raiders had three guys that were all starter level and it just created chaos. Once they jettisoned Marc Wilson and turned everything over to Plunkett and said "he's the guy" they won a lot more. Having those two jostling for starts from week to week was bad for the team.

You need a Doug Williams. A guy who can play hard, rally the team, is liked by teammates, and can throw the ball. You don't need Jonny Unitas on the sidelines. Doug stepped in and won a Superbowl just by being a super well prepared guy, which he always was, even in his bad days with the Bucs, nobody ever questioned Doug's preparation. Jeff Hostetler comes to mind too. He was given a chance as a full time starter in Oakland and just didn't have it, but as a part timer he was spectacular. He was a great backup, was a team oriented guy, and when he came in everybody stepped up a bit and helped him succeed because they knew they had to.

Feel bad for Webb he's typically better then he showed tonight, he appeared to be aiming and throwing off balance a lot.

I know Webb played terrible yesterday, but he's played better in the past, and he could make a nice back-up for RW with his ability to run the read-option his running ability. He's a free agent after the season is over.