| Author |
Message |
|
Renohawk
|
Post subject: Flynn or Sanchez as backup  Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:30 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 2:53 pm
Posts: 351
Location: Reno, Nevada
|
|
Would any of you opt to have Mark Sanchez as the backup to Wilson? Sanchez needs to get out of NY, Flynn needs to get out of Seattle (don't think he wants to sit on bench his entire contract) and maybe hooking Sanchez back with Carroll would do him some good.
_________________
"A superstar can win any game; however, a team can win every game".
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:31 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1522
|
|
No reason Flynn needs to get out of Seattle. No reason to bring in a backup that cant play football.
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cartire
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:33 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 1814
|
|
Marks Contract is worse then Flynns right now.
Plus do we really want to be that team that has Sanchez in the back. What if he ever had to start..?
Also, i think Flynn is fine where he is. Hes making good money, no risk of injury. He plays on the best team in the NFL, which means if his number is called one day, he'll be ready and happy to step up.
_________________
Time of possession is the most meaningless statistic in football. -RolandDeschain
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:33 am |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 14030
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Are you serious? Have you seen Sanchez's contract? You're practically giving up our entire secondary for a backup.
_________________
Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:35 am |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 7393
|
|
I would puke if we picked up Snatchez.
_________________
RELEASE THE KRAKEN! (FREE BROWNER!)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:40 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am
Posts: 2180
|
|
As stated above, his contract is terrible. But if he renegotiated it to something befitting his backup status I guess I might be ok with it if Flynn wants out (as I'm sure he does, and I don't blame him)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:40 am |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 17312
Location: The beautiful PNW
|
|
Pay lots more for a worse player AND put the Jets in a better position to win? Sign me up!
_________________
World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:41 am |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 10821
Location: Gibsons, BC Canada
|
|
Lol. Rly!? No.... silly post. Sanchez is hella expensive and he suuuuuuucks.
_________________ Dr. Seuss wrote: From there to here, from here to there, EARL THOMAS is everywhere... #FREEBROWNER
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LawHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:42 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:04 pm
Posts: 3138
|
|
Almost every single "He's a USC guy, Carroll will try to get him to Seattle" theory has been wrong. I doubt Carroll even wants him. Carroll has said, and shown with his actions, that he is more likely to undervalue the player based on his experience, rather than overvalue him.
_________________
We want the ball and we're gonna score.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:44 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 7498
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
|
If Sanchez was willing to take the league minimum, I STILL wouldn't take him as our backup. I would take T-Jack back over Sanchez for twice the price.
_________________  Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 8:57 am |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
|
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 10821
Location: Gibsons, BC Canada
|
volsunghawk wrote: If Sanchez was willing to take the league minimum, I STILL wouldn't take him as our backup. I would take T-Jack back over Sanchez for twice the price. Amen. If we DO move Flynn, TJack would be a great choice to back up Rusty IMO. _________________ Dr. Seuss wrote: From there to here, from here to there, EARL THOMAS is everywhere... #FREEBROWNER
|
|
| |
|
|
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:01 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8594
Location: Covington, Washington
|
|
While we are at it, may as well put Tebow's name in this post. Carson Palmer is most likely out with the Raiders and Leinhart as well.
_________________  Leon Washington 2010-2012 Sidney Rice 2011-2013 Red Bryant 2008-2013 - Gone but not forgotten. WAG - Wilson signs for $18M+ whenever he finally signs (3/4/2014)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve2222
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:16 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:12 am
Posts: 746
|
|
Even if there contracts were the same, a Flynn for Sanchez trade straight up wouldn't make any sense. At least with Flynn, theres still hope he can be a quality starter. With Sanchez, its iffy if he's even a quality back up.
Now if it was a Flynn for Sanchez and a third round pick, that might be worth a look (assuming the Jets eat most of his contract or he takes a pay cut).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AceBoogie715
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:22 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 6:07 am
Posts: 106
Location: Athens, Georgia
|
|
Please, let's not bring the circus to Seattle (in my Stephen A. Smith voice).
Haha, but seriously, I'd rather keep Flynn, or let PC/JS draft a 5th round QB to backup. I trust that the draft pick will have talent considering our recent draft picks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
12th_Bob
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:24 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm
Posts: 1741
|
|
Sanchez is finished, only a desperate waiver wire team will give him a chance next season. He'll have to renegotiate that contract to even get a chance somewhere else. With Ryan staying, I'm guessing they'll start him again, good new everyone else in the AFCE!
Rather keep Flynn and draft a guy unless someone offered us a good draft pick for Flynn. I still want nothing to do with Sanchez.
_________________
NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Shock2k
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:24 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm
Posts: 1111
|
|
So what was the problem with Portis? Why wouldn't we bring him back, given our current offensive scheme he would seem to be a good fit, and cheap.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:28 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2241
|
|
Why would we want a worse backup that's making more money than Flynn?
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chawx
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:29 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 1013
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
|
|
This thread reminds me, shit.... where's LenDale White??? ...or, even better, Matt Lienart?! Who else is a P.O.S. player that went to USC that we can snatch up and pay lots of money for?
_________________ posted by ps. If you're interested in this Seahawks font—PM me or darksidedesign.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cartire
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:29 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 1814
|
Shock2k wrote: So what was the problem with Portis? Why wouldn't we bring him back, given our current offensive scheme he would seem to be a good fit, and cheap. Usually when a QB is on the PS for 2 years, its because hes cant get any higher. We like to call them "Projects" and "Prospects", but the truth is, PS QB almost never, ever make it higher then a backup, and thats if they are lucky. He had some ok at bats during the 2011 preseason, but obviously nothing was to be with him after this year.
_________________
Time of possession is the most meaningless statistic in football. -RolandDeschain
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Shock2k
|
Post subject: Re: Flynn or Sanchez as backup Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:32 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm
Posts: 1111
|
Cartire wrote: Shock2k wrote: So what was the problem with Portis? Why wouldn't we bring him back, given our current offensive scheme he would seem to be a good fit, and cheap. Usually when a QB is on the PS for 2 years, its because hes cant get any higher. We like to call them "Projects" and "Prospects", but the truth is, PS QB almost never, ever make it higher then a backup, and thats if they are lucky. He had some ok at bats during the 2011 preseason, but obviously nothing was to be with him after this year. Ya, I was just wondering what it was specifically.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
