Seahawks ranked #4 in final NFL Power Rankings

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
  • Didn't see this posted yet. ... s_harrison

    Seahawks are #4 in the final NFL Power Rankings. What's interesting is looking at the teams who we are ranked ahead of. Think back to the beginning of the season and realize how far this team has come in one year. Amazing.
    User avatar
    NET Rookie
    Posts: 103
    Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 10:42 am

  • number 5 on ESPN
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 2816
    Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 6:52 pm
    Location: Kirkland

  • And of course Tates TD was mentioned under the Packers comment.
    Image Image
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 2255
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
    Location: Marysville, WA

  • Crizilla wrote:number 5 on ESPN

    Sando wanted to write "Hawks suck on the road," but dug around for something nastier.
    User avatar
    NET Starter
    Posts: 329
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 11:31 pm

  • Meh. Should be #2 under the Broncos IMO.

    "Shaquem Griffin tells ESPN after he got drafted by Seattle; 'I can't breathe.' That's the only time you'll hear him say he can't do something." - Dan Wetzel via Twitter.
    User avatar
    [[ .NET Godfather ]]
    Posts: 12946
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
    Location: Just 4 miles from Richard Sherman!

  • Aros wrote:Meh. Should be #2 under the Broncos IMO.

    Agreed, #4, OR #5 is a joke.
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 6604
    Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm

  • Floridahawk79 wrote:Fox has us #9 ??????

    This one's a joke right? We won and we moved down a spot?

    And the Packers lost and moved up? While the Vikings went down 2?

    This is a joke.
    NET Practice Squad
    Posts: 52
    Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 5:02 pm

  • Atleast give us #3

    If he was going to give Atlanta the #1 spot back then because they were the only undefeated team even though he and everyone knew they suck, atleast give us #3 cus we beat the patriots. Of course it doesn't matter. Teams can have the #1-2-3 ... we'll take the Superbowl.
    User avatar
    NET Starter
    Posts: 452
    Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:44 pm
    Location: Washington

  • I can only imagine the massive erections brought about in this forum by the placement of us at #9. For a fleeting moment, we had lost any legitimate opportunity to bitch about being underrated by the media.
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 2046
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:26 am
    Location: Indianapolis

  • Win 4 more games .. that's the only "power ranking" thats worth a crap
    ImTheScientist wrote:This guy is the closest thing to beast mode we will ever see. You got a glimpse of that yesterday. He was instantly my favorite player when they signed him. Give the dude a chance and don't overreact or overthink preseason. Go Hawks. Lacy will rush for 1,100 and 10TDs. Bend the knee.
    User avatar
    * NET Sage *
    Posts: 11385
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm

  • Still feels good to have the Seahawks in the Top 5 again.
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 1183
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm
    Location: Superbowl Glory

  • The NFL power ranking makes more sense as it has the 49ers and Packers below us. ESPN pretty much mirrors the teams records and doesn't take into consideration momentum, margin of victory, season trends, etc.
    F-16 Viper Driver
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 5100
    Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:46 pm
    Location: Phoenix, AZ

  • Good line from the rankings: "Premium secondary + effective running attack + quarterback who doesn't pull any Sanchize's = Super Bowl threat."
    NET Starter
    Posts: 304
    Joined: Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:01 pm

  • I dont mind #4 or #5 but #9 is a complete joke. I respect Billick but come on man... just admit you havent watched a Seahawks game this year and I will be cool about your placement of them
    NET Starter
    Posts: 441
    Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:50 pm

  • You lose all credibility when you place a 10-6 team with an easy schedule ahead of an 11=5 team with one of the toughest schedules on the year. That's just ignorant right there.
    The Lion has no interest in the opinion of the sheep.
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 4235
    Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am

  • theres really only ONE way to define the #1 team...

    I for one am going to wait...
    GO HAWKS!!!
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 1552
    Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2010 6:29 pm

  • Seahawks are the number 1 overall team by the stats that I count: ... oa-ratings

    Now they don't take into account, kneel downs, passes that are dropped or the like. But this is the closest I can find. But it's really just for arguments sake, nothing but the a Superbowl win will matter in the end.
    User avatar
    NET Veteran
    Posts: 1183
    Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm
    Location: Superbowl Glory

It is currently Sat Dec 15, 2018 3:36 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member


  • Who is online