Playoff odds football outsiders

LawHawk

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,145
Reaction score
0
Atlanta has a much higher chance of going to the NFC Championship (understandable given that they have to win one home game and we have to win two road games) yet they have a lower SB win chance. Weird. Go Hawks.
 

hawksfanohio

Member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
529
Reaction score
1
Location
In A Van Down By The River
I think it's interesting that we have the 4th highest odds to go to the SB seeing that unless we play Minnesota at some point, we will have to win all games on the road. I guess we are not as bad on the road as the media makes us out to be.
 
OP
OP
Greenhell

Greenhell

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,539
Reaction score
53
Even the stats are saying the Donkeys have the best chance at winning the SB in NOLA. Go figure. Mannings birth hometown. Ugh!
 

bmorepunk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
2,990
Reaction score
201
Greenhell":2uodppxw said:
Even the stats are saying the Donkeys have the best chance at winning the SB in NOLA. Go figure. Mannings birth hometown. Ugh!

If the Seahawks don't win the Super Bowl I want the Broncos to.

Now this is confusing, because I spent so many years hating horse-smile Elway and his team, but I'd like to see Manning get another Super Bowl in the Manning-Brady debate. Brady is top notch but I've always considered Manning to be a level above him because he's a mastermind; Brady's the ultimate play executor. I think too much emphasis is put on Super Bowl wins when we're talking about players, particularly QBs. Marino doesn't get as much credit as Elway (even though I think he and Manning are the best since I started watching football) because of the Super Bowl vacancy.
 
OP
OP
Greenhell

Greenhell

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,539
Reaction score
53
bmorepunk":3txt5jud said:
Greenhell":3txt5jud said:
Even the stats are saying the Donkeys have the best chance at winning the SB in NOLA. Go figure. Mannings birth hometown. Ugh!

If the Seahawks don't win the Super Bowl I want the Broncos to.

Now this is confusing, because I spent so many years hating horse-smile Elway and his team, but I'd like to see Manning get another Super Bowl in the Manning-Brady debate. Brady is top notch but I've always considered Manning to be a level above him because he's a mastermind; Brady's the ultimate play executor. I think too much emphasis is put on Super Bowl wins when we're talking about players, particularly QBs. Marino doesn't get as much credit as Elway (even though I think he and Manning are the best since I started watching football) because of the Super Bowl vacancy.

NEVER! I never want to see Manning or Denver ever win another Super Bowl. You see, I live in Colorado and the rivalry between myself and friends who are Bronco fans still runs deep after all these years. Still to this day, no respect and they think the Hawks are less of a team. Screw that!
 

HansGruber

New member
Joined
Mar 7, 2012
Messages
2,740
Reaction score
0
It's so amusing when statisticians and other non-scientists run a HUGE number of test simulations using the same deterministic seed data without any account for stochastic drift. As if our grand, bizarre, chaotic universe can be so easily described.

True non-determinism can not be simulated by rolling a dice with a fixed number of faces an infinite number of times. You must roll a dice with an infinite number of faces, and the number of times is unimportant.

Therefore, their results are mathematically less accurate than having a drunken blind man pick names from a hat at random.
 

SNDavidson

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 29, 2009
Messages
2,692
Reaction score
614
HansGruber":250ghwhr said:
Therefore, their results are mathematically less accurate than having a drunken blind man pick names from a hat at random.

Depends, is it a top hat or a sombrero? budweiser or tequila?
 

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,817
Reaction score
1,789
HansGruber":3s53thgt said:
It's so amusing when statisticians and other non-scientists run a HUGE number of test simulations using the same deterministic seed data without any account for stochastic drift. As if our grand, bizarre, chaotic universe can be so easily described.

True non-determinism can not be simulated by rolling a dice with a fixed number of faces an infinite number of times. You must roll a dice with an infinite number of faces, and the number of times is unimportant.

Therefore, their results are mathematically less accurate than having a drunken blind man pick names from a hat at random.
LOL, So what you're saying, is that these odds are predicated by a desired outcome of these prognosticators?, LOL,if so, I agree
 
OP
OP
Greenhell

Greenhell

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,539
Reaction score
53
SNDavidson":3pzoi7d3 said:
HansGruber":3pzoi7d3 said:
Therefore, their results are mathematically less accurate than having a drunken blind man pick names from a hat at random.

Depends, is it a top hat or a sombrero? budweiser or tequila?


Mmmmm tequilla...and I'll be wearing my sombrero tonight.
 
Top