| Author |
Message |
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:15 pm |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am Posts: 16265 Location: Bothell
|
SacHawk2.0 wrote: Touchdown Yea, just like the other 24 touchdowns Wilson has thrown this year. Had all the elements of a touchdown. Counted for seven points.
_________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
oregonhawkfan
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:03 pm |
|
| *SILVER SUPPORTER* |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:08 pm Posts: 1635
|
|
The Golden Catch
_________________ Strong safety Kam Chancellor, a 6-foot-3, 232-pound rhinoceros in cleats.....REED ALBERGOTTI Put them together, and this long-limbed, fleet-a-foot foursome forms a formidable force. ....Clare Farnsworth referencing the best NFL secondary also known as the "Legion of Boom"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Gifted1
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:09 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2012 5:52 pm Posts: 23
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
BlueTalon
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:17 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am Posts: 6798 Location: Eastern Washington
|
Seahawk Sailor wrote: Had all the elements of a touchdown. 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Seaman
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:30 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:12 am Posts: 220
|
Gifted1 wrote: "A Twist Of Tate" That's awesome!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
olyfan63
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 1:02 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am Posts: 275
|
|
I'm going with "Wail Mary" because of all the whiny butt-hurt Packer fans. It's in better keeping with "Phail Mary" (intentional misspelling) and slips neatly in place of it. I'll use that term whenever I discuss the "Wail Mary" game where Tate caught the game-winning TD and Packer fans whined and wailed about it for months thereafter. I think I had a post last week where I used the wrong phrase so I'll find it and correct it to "Wail Mary".
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SeaChase
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:13 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 3:12 pm Posts: 172
|
|
"The ending of the replacement refs"
_________________ Go SeaHawks
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
slargent4ever
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:41 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:05 pm Posts: 224
|
|
The Packer packer.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Apeman00
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:17 am |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 1:39 pm Posts: 60 Location: Seattle
|
|
I thought you needed to have at least 2 feet down, an elbow or knee to be considered a catch. The packers had none of that. Tate had equal possession and his backside on the ground. Seahawk Ball!
I like "A Twist of Tate". To me that really sounds like Seahawks new coming out statement!!! IF our Seahawks trash the league with Russell Wilson for the next decade, that play will be the one that caught national attention for Russell. A name that states "Hello World I'm Russell Wilson" is what I think the name should represent.
I don't care who the opponent that day was. That will be forgotten. It is going to be all about the Seahawks, Russell Wilson and Golden Tate. So I also like the name "The Golden Reception".
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jayneseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:23 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:17 pm Posts: 3 Location: Rochester, NY
|
Apeman00 wrote: I don't care who the opponent that day was. That will be forgotten. I disagree with this part. As someone who lives in Bills country I can't tell you how many times "Wide Right" is brought up every year when the Bills go for a field goal. This will never be forgotten. I do like Golden Reception though.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:29 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16429 Location: SoCal
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
zhawk
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 7:53 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 7:35 am Posts: 344
|
Largent80 wrote: classic!!! 
_________________ I don't know why I bother... no one cares what I think.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Atradees
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:17 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm Posts: 1993 Location: South of Heaven
|
|
The Fail Mary is pretty funny. We had much more sack than them. They were lucky our offense wasn't up to speed or another blowout.....
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
onanygivensunday
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:33 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am Posts: 2086
|
|
Over time (another 20 years or so), the memory of that catch will fade except for it being the final straw leading to resolution of the NFL's labor disagreement battle with the Referee's union.
Had it occurred during a playoff game, it would be remembered as much as "Wide Right" and the Immaculate Reception... but it didn't.
And there is nothing that we can do in the near term that will change the national perception that Green Bay was screwed and Seattle was gifted a win.
And if the Seahawks make it to the Superbowl this season (and especially if they win it all), the history books (Wiki article) will be about the magical season Seattle experienced with a rookie QB named Russell Wilson.
That, more than anything else, will cause the Twist of Tate catch memory to fade away into obscurity.
_________________ "Wilson will come in there pissing lightning and crapping thunder! Watch out!" ... Tech Worlds, 5/9/2012
Endzorn, 3 min. later... "Football aside, I would pay money to see that. I'm serious."
Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 33 years and counting.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
acbass
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:38 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:55 pm Posts: 348
|
|
I don't know if anyone reads Sports Illustrated, but buried in the back pages of a recent issue they reexamined the play. They went through the steps of a simultaneous catch and concluded that, by rule, it was a simultaneous catch. They pointed out that who has "more control" was irrelevant. I showed it to a Packers fan. He was not amused. Ha
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bobincovington
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:39 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 10:37 am Posts: 24
|
|
I think we should be damn proud of that game-winning play. I do like Golden Reception as our own label and I love Wail Mary as a funny reminder of all the whiners out there... But I really don't want to acknowledge the butt-hurt packer fans and the talking heads because I think of it as one hell of an athletic play by a guy that just wanted to win. We should show the Golden Reception play on the big screen before every packer game and the 12th man can give it a standing O.
Favorite Highlights... Golden Reception Russell Wilson's last 4 games Harbough's post game presser Romo botched fumble Beastquake Run Kam Hit on Vernon Walter Jones Block into the Endzone Hass sliding on his knees for the Touchdown Cortez... Largent Hit on Harden ...Damn there are just too many LOL
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
acbass
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:46 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:55 pm Posts: 348
|
|
Today on Mike and Mike, they were talking about what would have happened if that play was called "correctly." That's such crap. That's a dead horse that has called "Uncle" a long time ago. It was somebody with Sclereth (sp?) but I think it was M&M. Mark flipped it talking about how no one thought it would affect us as far as playoffs go. Gave kudos to Pete. Good to see some people can look past it.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Giblien
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:47 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:08 am Posts: 485
|
FlyingGreg wrote: How about.... "By The Letter Of The Law In The NFL Rulebook It Was A #@$!*&^ Catch" THIS!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawkfan51
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:56 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:24 am Posts: 5
|
|
Long time Montana fan, first time poster ! "THE GOLDEN RULE"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SilkMonkey
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 9:58 am |
|
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2011 8:31 pm Posts: 131
|
|
I've been calling it two things:
Stop whining Aaron Rodgers -Or- Touchdown
The latter is what I call the play to anyone who tries to say the Seahawks somehow "stole" or "cheated" or were gifted a win.
OPI on a hail mary as time runs out is irrelevant and there's not a "more control" clause in the rule.
_________________ Currently riding SHOTGUN on the Russell Wilson bandwagon.
Renton Chapter Seahawkers Booster Club Section 316 @ CenturyLink Field
Kuendelea Mwewe - Go Hawks
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: AceBoogie715, coorslighthawk, grizbob, Hawkfish, JesterHawk, Largent80, largenutz, NYCoug, onanygivensunday, peachesenregalia, quadsas, Scottemojo, Seahwkgal, SoulfishHawk, streets24, T-Sizzle, Terpdragon, VancitySeahawk, XxXdragonXxX, yeash28 and 149 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |