| Author |
Message |
|
Seeker
|
Post subject: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD  Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:10 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:21 pm
Posts: 531
|
|
Guys, we are probably gonna win it all this year, and if we do you KNOW they are gonna show that highlight. Both the Holy Roller and Immaculate Reception were wrong calls that shouldn't have been scores. but you know what those teams had?
MARKETING
what should WE call OUR play? that thing is gonna be in the history books some day, shouldn't have it be something better than a "they cheated" undertone. maybe something that seemed divine?
all just for fun guys but i'd be interested to here what you think
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:14 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4877
|
"Wail Mary" for all the crying about it by Packers, Pundits and Peckerheads.  _________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BlueTalon
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:21 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 6804
Location: Eastern Washington
|
|
Let's call it the Immaculate Reception.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
oasis
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:33 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2010 10:01 am
Posts: 176
|
|
| |
|
|
|
djb28
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:35 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 5:40 am
Posts: 803
|
|
The DangeRuss Reception
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SalishHawkFan
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:41 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 2683
|
|
The Hand of Tate.
_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawxfreak
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:44 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:04 pm
Posts: 31
|
|
| |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:49 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 2772
|
|
I heard one the other day I liked.
The Inaccurate Reception.
Or we can go with: The InterReception
The Replacement Theft
The Golden Left Hand
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GoHawks
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:57 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 3:49 pm
Posts: 353
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5714
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
How about.... "By The Letter Of The Law In The NFL Rulebook It Was A #@$!*&^ Catch"
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:09 pm |
|
| * NET Expertise Expert * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14275
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
ivotuk wrote: "Wail Mary" for all the crying about it by Packers, Pundits and Peckerheads. Winner.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bobincovington
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:11 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Sun May 06, 2012 10:37 am
Posts: 25
|
|
I have to say that I re-watched that play again today from the multitude of the available angles... I don't really care what other self appointed armchair replay officials call it, but I'm convinced Tate has his hands on the ball and has equal possession (tie goes to the offense). So coining terms like Fail Mary is just someone else attempting to disguise their butthurt-ness about the Pack losing to the Seahawks (I think that is a word). I'm officially tired of apologizing for winning and waiting for someone else with clouded judgment to see what I see. I say it was Golden Tate out hustling his opponent and say way to go Golden!
By the way, just to paint the picture of how ridiculous these folks are (I'm sure there are decent Packer fans out there too)... I bet a bottle of spirits on the game with a friend who happens to be a packer fan. He was ribbing me saying are you sure you want to bet? I even texted him right after the game and said "man, sorry for you to lose like that but what a crazy game" I thought he was a good friend, but his response.... nothing, He has not talked to me since or paid his bet. I am still shaking my head at this one, but at least I bet on my team.
But if I must give it another name how about "The Golden Reception" Go Hawks!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
400WattHPSHawk
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:12 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:09 pm
Posts: 1254
Location: Central Washington
|
RolandDeschain wrote: ivotuk wrote: "Wail Mary" for all the crying about it by Packers, Pundits and Peckerheads. Winner. Spoken too soon Roland. FlyingGreg wrote: How about.... "By The Letter Of The Law In The NFL Rulebook It Was A #@$!*&^ Catch" Dats your winner right there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:14 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 5010
|
|
Touchdown
_________________
Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 2772
|
bobincovington wrote: I have to say that I re-watched that play again today from the multitude of the available angles... I don't really care what other self appointed armchair replay officials call it, but I'm convinced Tate has his hands on the ball and has equal possession (tie goes to the offense). So coining terms like Fail Mary is just someone else attempting to disguise their butthurt-ness about the Pack losing to the Seahawks (I think that is a word). I'm officially tired of apologizing for winning and waiting for someone else with clouded judgment to see what I see. I say it was Golden Tate out hustling his opponent and say way to go Golden!
By the way, just to paint the picture of how ridiculous these folks are (I'm sure there are decent Packer fans out there too)... I bet a bottle of spirits on the game with a friend who happens to be a packer fan. He was ribbing me saying are you sure you want to bet? I even texted him right after the game and said "man, sorry for you to lose like that but what a crazy game" I thought he was a good friend, but his response.... nothing, He has not talked to me since or paid his bet. I am still shaking my head at this one, but at least I bet on my team.
But if I must give it another name how about "The Golden Reception" Go Hawks! Yup. Left hand on ball. Doesn't matter who has "more control", two hands or whatever. If you needed two hands to have possession, then someone better correct that David Tyree helmet catch. And your friend is a sad, crybaby punk with no integrity.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JKent82
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:31 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:13 pm
Posts: 2816
|
ivotuk wrote: "Wail Mary" for all the crying about it by Packers, Pundits and Peckerheads. Perfect. Perfect. Perfect.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 993
Location: The 5-0
|
ivotuk wrote: "Wail Mary" for all the crying about it by Packers, Pundits and Peckerheads. Awesome. It could also be referred to as "the gods of football finally giving the Hawks some love" catch.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Shock2k
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm
Posts: 579
|
|
Can we call it, "The Golden Tate all over Your Green Face", play. Hmm, probably to long.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:45 pm |
|
| * NET Expertise Expert * |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14275
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
400WattHPSHawk wrote: Spoken too soon Roland. FlyingGreg wrote: How about.... "By The Letter Of The Law In The NFL Rulebook It Was A #@$!*&^ Catch" Dats your winner right there. Hell no. I saw that before I posted; it's good, but Wail Mary is absolutely hysterical.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rastahawk
|
Post subject: Re: OFFICIAL FAIL MARY RENAMING THREAD Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 10:03 pm |
|
| * Just Chillin' * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:51 am
Posts: 743
Location: Los Angeles
|
|
"Packer's Golden Shower"
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: Aros, decaff907, Fuzzman55, gargantual, Google [Bot], HansGruber, HawKnPeppa, kearly, RynoHawk, Seahawksfan425, themunn, TwilightError, vin.couve12 and 54 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
