 |
| Author |
Message |
|
SouthSoundHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End  Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 2:49 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am
Posts: 660
|
|
Bleacher report is garbage, can't believe I saw ads for them during a football game...
Also, this team is solid across the board...nit picking is fine with me!
_________________
Go Hawks.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Aros
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:04 pm |
|
| [[ .NET Godfather ]] |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 5350
Location: Maple Valley, WA
|
|
Why does anyone here care about Bleacher Report? I've never read a single sentence from their website and the reason for that is simple. Every single time "Bleacher Report" is mentioned in a post, it's to make fun of how terrible they are.
But there's always "but" for some reason, as in, "I know, I know, it's the Bleacher Report, BUT..."
_________________  "WE ALL WE GOT! WE ALL WE NEED!"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Slick
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:26 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 7:52 am
Posts: 438
Location: Beacon Hill, Seattle, WA
|
|
I've never read Bleacher Report but us calling them out for scrutinizing the RW pick is like the pot calling the kettle black. The majority of us morons (self included) over here assumed Flynn to be the starter and RW some kind of project.
Sports bloggers make me want to commit hari kari.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
olyfan63
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:09 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 2:03 am
Posts: 267
|
ensett wrote: Miller is a proven pro-bowler and McCoy finally figured things out, even our 3rd in McGrath or Morrah if he comes back have both shown strong potential. What is the story on Cameron Morrah? I always liked the dude because it seemed like he made plays. He was waived/injured. Anyone know what happened? I think he was a better pass-catcher than McCoy, possibly almost on par with Miller as a receiver, but not quite as good a blocker as either.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 8:58 pm |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8719
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
olyfan63 wrote: ensett wrote: Miller is a proven pro-bowler and McCoy finally figured things out, even our 3rd in McGrath or Morrah if he comes back have both shown strong potential. What is the story on Cameron Morrah? I always liked the dude because it seemed like he made plays. He was waived/injured. Anyone know what happened? I think he was a better pass-catcher than McCoy, possibly almost on par with Miller as a receiver, but not quite as good a blocker as either. I thought he was just on regular old injured reserve. Don't think he got a settlement or anything... _________________   Papaki douchebag love turtle long time When the Thunder play the Grizzlies, I'll be cheering for a tornado.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 9:36 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 6436
|
|
Can some body pass this along to Bleacher Report for me?
INCORRECT
_________________
"Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
| |
|
|
|
morgulon1
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 11:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 10:07 am
Posts: 3156
Location: Moses Lake, Wa
|
HawkWow wrote: If the Notre Dame kid (Eifert) is available, we may have to consider him. He's not the best blocker around, but has a knack for finding empty spots to settle. I think he would be a weapon for RW worthy of consideration. I'm hoping for a stud DT sometime early, but getting Eifert in the first, then trading up to get Woods in the 2nd would be huge for the O side. Without this ending up in the draft forum, I'd say I have to agree with you on the bad ass DT. A game changer type. The only problem is that they are so hard to get and are coveted by every single team in the league. If we had one. We would be absolute hell to deal with. I'm not worried about tight end.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
minormillikin
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2012 11:16 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:32 pm
Posts: 1037
Location: Tumwater
|
|
"Bleacher Report" doesn't say anything. Unpaid contributors on their website say stuff.
This would be like me starting a thread titled, "Seahawks.net says Flynn should be the new starter," because one troll in the gameday forum overreacted after Wilson threw an interception.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BlueTalon
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:36 am |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 6791
Location: Eastern Washington
|
minormillikin wrote: "Bleacher Report" doesn't say anything. Unpaid contributors on their website say stuff.
This would be like me starting a thread titled, "Seahawks.net says Flynn should be the new starter," because one troll in the gameday forum overreacted after Wilson threw an interception. Fair point -- except on Seahawks.NET, you run a far greater risk of reading something intelligent.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Bleacher Report says we need a Tight End Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:24 am |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 7698
|
drdiags wrote: 3-Tech DT that can collapse the pocket enhances the investment made into Irvin. A dynamic WR or a LB are other options I think need higher priority. This for sure. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 671hawk, Aros, Bigpumpkin, BlueTalons, brettb3, City Of Reign, dbmack, drdiags, edogg23, glucas11, hai, Hawken-Dazs, HawkFan72, HawkGANG, IllWill49, kf3339, LymonHawk, Maelstrom787, oregonhawkfan, seattlesportsfan24, slipwax, TheRealDTM and 116 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
