SEC FAN wrote:Are you questioning weather or not I am a Seahawk fan?
ruffENrowdy wrote:Haha you are right. The SEC is only interested in scheduling games with U of I. My mistake man, my apologies.
ruffENrowdy wrote:http://keepingscore.blogs.time.com/2012/12/11/the-college-football-top-25-as-ranked-by-academics/
Totally right man! Boise has HORRIBLE acedemics! Stanford must be a bunch of morons as well..
ruffENrowdy wrote:http://keepingscore.blogs.time.com/2012/12/11/the-college-football-top-25-as-ranked-by-academics/
Totally right man! Boise has HORRIBLE acedemics! Stanford must be a bunch of morons as well..
ruffENrowdy wrote:But my gosh, the PAC-12 chose Utah and Colorado over BSU.
ruffENrowdy wrote:http://keepingscore.blogs.time.com/2012/12/11/the-college-football-top-25-as-ranked-by-academics/
Totally right man! Boise has HORRIBLE acedemics! Stanford must be a bunch of morons as well..
canzag wrote:So on Price-If Sark does not open the QB job for competion he is nuts.He really regressed this year.2 big time recruits finished redshirt seasons and one is on the way.I would open the job and let the best guy win it.
The big Boise state senior corner has a bit of a Seahawk look to him.I could see it.Cannot have enough big corners.
hawksfansinceday1 wrote:SEC FAN, most of the schools in your beloved conference schedule shit opponents out of conference and when they actually don't, it's usually someone they play at home. MAJOR kudos to LSU for playing Oregon last year though, even if playing in Dullass did favor them somewhat. Now that there's going to be a playoff with a selection commitee, I think the days of schools loading up on FCS/crappy FBS schools is about over. An upset 2 point loss to say Iowa for example with an otherwise 10-1 record, I am hopeful will carry more weight with a commitee than an 11-0 record and a blowout of say Northern Iowa.
It is currently Sun Apr 22, 2018 4:21 pm
Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]