Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:10 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:32 pm
Posts: 102
Has anyone heard anything regarding his appeal? The only thing I found online was that they were going to decide next week on what to do.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:11 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am
Posts: 2288
the later in the day it gets, the more likely it is that he plays sunday. thats all i know


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:15 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1971
Quote:
Albert Breer ‏@AlbertBreer
Also said on ATL that Seahawks CB Richard Sherman will not hear from the league on his appeal before Sunday's game, clearing him to play.


He is playing

_________________
Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"

Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:17 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:42 am
Posts: 243
latest tweet, who knows if it's for sure or not though.

RT @AlbertBreer: Seahawks CB Richard Sherman will not hear from the league on his appeal before Sunday's game, clearing him to play.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:18 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2740
SeahawksFanForever wrote:
Quote:
Albert Breer ‏@AlbertBreer
Also said on ATL that Seahawks CB Richard Sherman will not hear from the league on his appeal before Sunday's game, clearing him to play.


He is playing


That mirrors what most experts have predicted. His hearing was only scheduled to be heard today. A ruling was not expected until next week.

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:27 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 3076
Location: Anchorage, AK
Why is it so hard to write a proper title for a thread?

Such as
Anything new on Richard Sherman?
When will Sherman hear about suspension?
When will we hear about Sherman's suspension?
Has Sherman been cleared yet?
Will Sherman play this Sunday?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:36 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1971
mikeak wrote:
Why is it so hard to write a proper title for a thread?

Such as
Anything new on Richard Sherman?
When will Sherman hear about suspension?
When will we hear about Sherman's suspension?
Has Sherman been cleared yet?
Will Sherman play this Sunday?



HEY! He is on the practice squad. Leave him alone!

_________________
Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"

Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:09 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
Posts: 2346
Location: Sammamish, WA
Tough crowd

_________________
60 percent of the time..........it works........every time


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:12 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4664
Location: The 5-0
This is a money game for the NFL brand. Only a NE meltdown prevented it from being (arguably) the biggest game of the season. No way would Goodell keep one of the league's top players sidelined if it could be avoided, IMO.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:39 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:32 pm
Posts: 102
mikeak wrote:
Why is it so hard to write a proper title for a thread?

Such as
Anything new on Richard Sherman?
When will Sherman hear about suspension?
When will we hear about Sherman's suspension?
Has Sherman been cleared yet?
Will Sherman play this Sunday?


why is it so hard for you to clink on a link?

such as
are you lazy?
does your mouse not work that well?
does reading cause you headaches?

good lord, what a stupid thing to complain about.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:08 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:57 am
Posts: 135
The board could use some better functionality when mouse hovering over the title... Showing the first line or so of the message..

In fairness to the OP... What was he going to write in the message body if he gave it all away in the title :p


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:11 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Delaware
John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:38 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 1599
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Maelstrom787 wrote:
John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday.


Well that just suuuuuucks!

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:47 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:23 pm
Posts: 937
Location: Marysville, WA
DHawk wrote:
Maelstrom787 wrote:
John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday.


Well that just suuuuuucks!


The only bright side is Browner will have served his punishment by the start of the playoffs so he'll be back in time for them.

If we can somehow, someway pull out a trip to the superbowl (crosses fingers)... Sherman would be back for the big game if his suspension starts in week 17.

If not, will Sherman will miss the start of next season. :?

_________________
WE ALL WE GOT! WE ALL WE NEED!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:49 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 4628
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
DHawk wrote:
Maelstrom787 wrote:
John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday.


Well that just suuuuuucks!


Sherman may have benn "pullin' the wool over some fans eyes", but he wasn't fooling John Clayton. John said that it was just a matter of time before he was suspended.

I sure wish that thE NFL could find a more appropriate and consistent solution to PED's.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:03 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4664
Location: The 5-0
Wow...I can't believe the "I accidently drank from another players water bottle that was apparently spiked with a banned substance" story fell short. Goodell is like a human lie detector!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 471
well.... you know he played little league football. :stirthepot:

_________________
I don't know why I bother... no one cares what I think.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4664
Location: The 5-0
zhawk wrote:
well.... you know he played little league football. :stirthepot:



Goodell or Clayton?

I have this image in my head of Goodell as Charlie Brown and Clayton as Linus.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:58 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 850
Maelstrom787 wrote:
John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday.


Interesting. Can't find anything on the web or Twitter to confirm this. The most recent story on ESPN is about him missing practice to travel to the appeal.

Two hours ago:

Richard Sherman ‏@RSherman_25

No questions about the appeal please the result will be announced soon enough. And I will be out there with my teammates Sunday!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:06 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:56 pm
Posts: 881
Location: Denver, Colorado
GOD BLESS MY BROTHA RICHARD SHERMAN


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:53 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 10:45 am
Posts: 276
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
Maelstrom787 wrote:
John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday.

Yeah he said that on with Bob and Groz as well. Clayton usually says whatever conventional wisdom tells him, like rest your starter if you have playoffs locked up, whether your chasing 16-0 or not, or you need a franchise qb to be successful. Clayton is just guessing on the appeal, but he is probably right.

P.S. Usually the only thing you will learn from the professor is injury status, the guys money on that.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:15 pm 
* NET News Scoop *
* NET News Scoop *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 8923
Clayton is only stating his opinion as fact. It is not fact yet.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:07 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am
Posts: 605
HawkWow wrote:
Wow...I can't believe the "I accidently drank from another players water bottle that was apparently spiked with a banned substance" story fell short. Goodell is like a human lie detector!


You still believe that the FAKE story about the water bottle that was debunked in person by Sherman himself was actually part of the appeal hearing?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:44 am 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10150
Location: Vancouver, WA
Something is telling me it gets cut in half to 2 games. Am I just fantasizing?

_________________
From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:01 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1934
hawksfansinceday1 wrote:
Something is telling me it gets cut in half to 2 games. Am I just fantasizing?



I am predicting one game so we will be short-handed against the Rams.

_________________
I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:22 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:26 am
Posts: 1066
Location: Indianapolis
From an interview I heard this week, they say a reduction is unlikely on something like a PED violation. Unlike suspensions like Haynesworth's for the stomp or whatever, PED use seems to be a pretty black-or-white "guilty" or "not guilty" without much room for gray area.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:33 am 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10150
Location: Vancouver, WA
MidwestHawker wrote:
From an interview I heard this week, they say a reduction is unlikely on something like a PED violation. Unlike suspensions like Haynesworth's for the stomp or whatever, PED use seems to be a pretty black-or-white "guilty" or "not guilty" without much room for gray area.

Sucks. Thanks for the info man.

_________________
From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:58 am 
* NET Eeyore *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10483
Location: Pasco, WA
BocciHawk wrote:
Maelstrom787 wrote:
John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday.


Interesting. Can't find anything on the web or Twitter to confirm this. The most recent story on ESPN is about him missing practice to travel to the appeal.

Two hours ago:

Richard Sherman ‏@RSherman_25

No questions about the appeal please the result will be announced soon enough. And I will be out there with my teammates Sunday!


Yeah, this Sunday, but what about the rest Sherm?

It just feels like no matter what he did he was gonna have to deal with the suspension.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:08 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
Posts: 2346
Location: Sammamish, WA
I'm guessing they are not allowed to talk about it, or at least the final results.

_________________
60 percent of the time..........it works........every time


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:31 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 902
Location: Everett, Wa
So when exactly does BB come back?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:36 pm 
* NET Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:05 am
Posts: 402
Location: Tacoma, Wa
garydrake425 wrote:
So when exactly does BB come back?


BB will be back after the Rams game.

_________________
Image
Downright thuggish.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atradees, dbmack, Floridahawk79, Google [Bot], grizbob, Guardian, jasehawk, Largefarva, LymonHawk, MrCarey, NCHawkFan, scutterhawk, thecycle, themunn, Top, UK_Seahawk and 68 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.