| Author |
Message |
|
tifferradish
|
Post subject: Richard Sherman  Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:10 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:32 pm
Posts: 102
|
|
Has anyone heard anything regarding his appeal? The only thing I found online was that they were going to decide next week on what to do.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am
Posts: 2291
|
|
the later in the day it gets, the more likely it is that he plays sunday. thats all i know
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeahawksFanForever
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1971
|
Quote: Albert Breer @AlbertBreer
Also said on ATL that Seahawks CB Richard Sherman will not hear from the league on his appeal before Sunday's game, clearing him to play. He is playing
_________________
Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"
Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12
|
|
| |
|
|
|
12thManHawkFan
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:17 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2012 7:42 am
Posts: 243
|
|
latest tweet, who knows if it's for sure or not though.
RT @AlbertBreer: Seahawks CB Richard Sherman will not hear from the league on his appeal before Sunday's game, clearing him to play.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2742
|
SeahawksFanForever wrote: Quote: Albert Breer @AlbertBreer
Also said on ATL that Seahawks CB Richard Sherman will not hear from the league on his appeal before Sunday's game, clearing him to play. He is playing That mirrors what most experts have predicted. His hearing was only scheduled to be heard today. A ruling was not expected until next week.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 3077
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
|
Why is it so hard to write a proper title for a thread?
Such as
Anything new on Richard Sherman?
When will Sherman hear about suspension?
When will we hear about Sherman's suspension?
Has Sherman been cleared yet?
Will Sherman play this Sunday?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeahawksFanForever
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:36 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1971
|
mikeak wrote: Why is it so hard to write a proper title for a thread?
Such as
Anything new on Richard Sherman?
When will Sherman hear about suspension?
When will we hear about Sherman's suspension?
Has Sherman been cleared yet?
Will Sherman play this Sunday? HEY! He is on the practice squad. Leave him alone!
_________________
Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"
Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SoulfishHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
Posts: 2368
Location: Sammamish, WA
|
|
Tough crowd
_________________
60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4667
Location: The 5-0
|
|
This is a money game for the NFL brand. Only a NE meltdown prevented it from being (arguably) the biggest game of the season. No way would Goodell keep one of the league's top players sidelined if it could be avoided, IMO.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
tifferradish
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:39 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
|
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 4:32 pm
Posts: 102
|
mikeak wrote: Why is it so hard to write a proper title for a thread?
Such as
Anything new on Richard Sherman?
When will Sherman hear about suspension?
When will we hear about Sherman's suspension?
Has Sherman been cleared yet?
Will Sherman play this Sunday? why is it so hard for you to clink on a link? such as are you lazy? does your mouse not work that well? does reading cause you headaches? good lord, what a stupid thing to complain about.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TruHammer07
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:08 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 11:57 am
Posts: 135
|
|
The board could use some better functionality when mouse hovering over the title... Showing the first line or so of the message..
In fairness to the OP... What was he going to write in the message body if he gave it all away in the title :p
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Maelstrom787
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Delaware
|
|
John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:50 pm
Posts: 1599
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
Maelstrom787 wrote: John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday. Well that just suuuuuucks! _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawksfanatik
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:47 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:23 pm
Posts: 937
Location: Marysville, WA
|
DHawk wrote: Maelstrom787 wrote: John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday. Well that just suuuuuucks! The only bright side is Browner will have served his punishment by the start of the playoffs so he'll be back in time for them. If we can somehow, someway pull out a trip to the superbowl (crosses fingers)... Sherman would be back for the big game if his suspension starts in week 17. If not, will Sherman will miss the start of next season. 
_________________
WE ALL WE GOT! WE ALL WE NEED!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Bigpumpkin
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:49 pm |
|
| *GOLD SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 4628
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
|
DHawk wrote: Maelstrom787 wrote: John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday. Well that just suuuuuucks!
I sure wish that thE NFL could find a more appropriate and consistent solution to PED's.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4667
Location: The 5-0
|
|
Wow...I can't believe the "I accidently drank from another players water bottle that was apparently spiked with a banned substance" story fell short. Goodell is like a human lie detector!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
zhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:13 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 471
|
well.... you know he played little league football. 
_________________
I don't know why I bother... no one cares what I think.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4667
Location: The 5-0
|
zhawk wrote: well.... you know he played little league football. Goodell or Clayton? I have this image in my head of Goodell as Charlie Brown and Clayton as Linus.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BocciHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm
Posts: 850
|
Maelstrom787 wrote: John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday. Interesting. Can't find anything on the web or Twitter to confirm this. The most recent story on ESPN is about him missing practice to travel to the appeal. Two hours ago: Richard Sherman @RSherman_25 No questions about the appeal please the result will be announced soon enough. And I will be out there with my teammates Sunday!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
largenutz
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 10:56 pm
Posts: 881
Location: Denver, Colorado
|
|
GOD BLESS MY BROTHA RICHARD SHERMAN
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BAllenHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:53 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun May 27, 2012 10:45 am
Posts: 276
Location: Tri-Cities, WA
|
Maelstrom787 wrote: John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday. Yeah he said that on with Bob and Groz as well. Clayton usually says whatever conventional wisdom tells him, like rest your starter if you have playoffs locked up, whether your chasing 16-0 or not, or you need a franchise qb to be successful. Clayton is just guessing on the appeal, but he is probably right. P.S. Usually the only thing you will learn from the professor is injury status, the guys money on that.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jazzhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 9:15 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 8923
|
|
Clayton is only stating his opinion as fact. It is not fact yet.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Navyhawkfan187
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am
Posts: 605
|
HawkWow wrote: Wow...I can't believe the "I accidently drank from another players water bottle that was apparently spiked with a banned substance" story fell short. Goodell is like a human lie detector! You still believe that the FAKE story about the water bottle that was debunked in person by Sherman himself was actually part of the appeal hearing?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:44 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10162
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
Something is telling me it gets cut in half to 2 games. Am I just fantasizing?
_________________ From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:01 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1935
|
hawksfansinceday1 wrote: Something is telling me it gets cut in half to 2 games. Am I just fantasizing? I am predicting one game so we will be short-handed against the Rams.
_________________
I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MidwestHawker
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:22 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:26 am
Posts: 1067
Location: Indianapolis
|
|
From an interview I heard this week, they say a reduction is unlikely on something like a PED violation. Unlike suspensions like Haynesworth's for the stomp or whatever, PED use seems to be a pretty black-or-white "guilty" or "not guilty" without much room for gray area.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:33 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10162
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
MidwestHawker wrote: From an interview I heard this week, they say a reduction is unlikely on something like a PED violation. Unlike suspensions like Haynesworth's for the stomp or whatever, PED use seems to be a pretty black-or-white "guilty" or "not guilty" without much room for gray area. Sucks. Thanks for the info man. _________________ From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:58 am |
|
| * NET Eeyore * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10489
Location: Pasco, WA
|
BocciHawk wrote: Maelstrom787 wrote: John Clayton on Sportscenter says that it looks like Sherman is getting the suspension and it'll start next week, the ruling coming as early as Monday. Interesting. Can't find anything on the web or Twitter to confirm this. The most recent story on ESPN is about him missing practice to travel to the appeal. Two hours ago: Richard Sherman @RSherman_25 No questions about the appeal please the result will be announced soon enough. And I will be out there with my teammates Sunday! Yeah, this Sunday, but what about the rest Sherm? It just feels like no matter what he did he was gonna have to deal with the suspension. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SoulfishHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
Posts: 2368
Location: Sammamish, WA
|
|
I'm guessing they are not allowed to talk about it, or at least the final results.
_________________
60 percent of the time..........it works........every time
|
|
| |
|
|
|
garydrake425
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:31 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 902
Location: Everett, Wa
|
|
So when exactly does BB come back?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzfan
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Sherman Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:36 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:05 am
Posts: 402
Location: Tacoma, Wa
|
garydrake425 wrote: So when exactly does BB come back? BB will be back after the Rams game. _________________  Downright thuggish.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 31 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: AbsolutNET, bytor72, Captain, chawx1, crucifyd, Exploding, Google [Bot], grizbob, halfrack, Hasselbeck, hawknation2014, hawksmode, HommyHawk, JimZorn10, LymonHawk, Natethegreat, oldhawkfan, onanygivensunday, razgriz737, Russ Willstrong, seabowl, Seahawk_Dan, Seahwkgal, SnowMan, tacomahawk, thecycle, TheHawkster, TwistedHusky, Uffda, valleyflyfisher, VB Hawk, Veilside, Zebulon Dak and 137 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
