Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ POLITICS, WAR & RELIGION FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Arm the teachers
 Post Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2012 11:18 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 4:06 pm
Posts: 132
Location: Portland Oregon
Late to the show, but let me rattle off a few thoughts:

1) Teachers
No need to have a formal program just allow for concealed carry. Don't restrict it to teachers, allow any school employee to carry who qualifies for a CHL.
With the exception of Fort Hood every mass shooting in the US in the last 10yrs had been in a 'Gun Free' zone. The psychos who perpetrate these acts avoid an environment where someone might shoot back and often flee or commit suicide when confronted.

2) Psychos
Sad but true, some people are just mentally defective and don't belong in society. We used to have Mental Health facilities for those cases, but thanks to bad press and good propaganda (see One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest) it's now near impossible to be committed. As a result we now have a booming 'homeless' population and no one is shocked after these incidents when they hear about the shooter's 'troubled' mental history.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Arm the teachers
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:50 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2362
JGfromtheNW wrote:
SonicHawk wrote:
fenderbender123 wrote:
Why do we see school shootings? Because there are lots of kids that go to school and they spend a hell of a lot of time there. To put things into more perspective...according to the educational researcher a school can expect to have a student homicide once every 6,000 years. Also, violent crimes have been steadily dropping since 1990.

Now, I'm not proposing that we do nothing in response to these horrific incidents, but I just thought I'd share some stuff with everyone. I understand the reasoning behind putting a cop in every school...but if it costs a state lets say 100 million dollars a year to put an officer in every school to (hopefully) prevent that one school shooting that happens (maybe) every three decades...is that really worth it? I know I know...you can't put a price on somebody's life...but we have to. Everything has a cost. If we spend billions of dollars to prevent every kind of situation that runs a similar risk to losing your life in a school shooting (which is so low it's practically zero)...well we would go broke. That's all we would ever spend our money on. I don't say this to sound harsh, but simply to put things in perspective. Our kids are more likely to die on the way home from school or at home than at school.

We're upset because we've been hearing about a horrific incident involving the deaths of kindergarten children. It's sad. It's sick. But we need to not let emotions get in the way of thinking logically. Our emotions from 9/11 led us to the patriot act and TSA. Lets not make another mistake.


I'm going to go through a few of these points. Direct cost and indirect cost.

Putting a policeman in a school is a costly endeavor if it's only duty is to prevent the NEXT Sandy Hook. Fortunately, there's far more that an on-duty police officer can do as a liaison, teacher, general security and authority figure. My high school got a police officer (unarmed) prior to Columbine and began being armed afterwards. He broke up fights, and probably prevented far more, watched kids who try to sneak off campus and get high during school hours, answered questions and was a part of the school. Whether he prevented a Columbine I don't know, but it was certainly a positive presence.

The TSA has an even larger impact. After 9/11 flying wasn't exactly popular. For those of us who had to fly frequently it was an uneasy time. Now, I have complete confidence that a bomb isn't going to go off or some guy didn't bring a box cutter onto the plane. I'm back to being afraid of mechanical problems instead of terrorism.

When people are scared to fly, they don't. And that halts this country.


I completely agree with you about the benefits an on-duty officer can bring to a school. Granted, he's not going to be the most popular guy there, but what he brings to a school is far more than just preventing massacres.

I don't think it's cost effective to have a cop at every school, though. I grew up in Wenatchee and that (relatively) small town has about 11 public schools (K-12). With an average income (before benefits and bonuses) of around $50,000, the city is then paying out a MINIMUM of $550,000/year to have 11 different officers at 11 different schools. These officers are going to be getting paid to hang out at schools for 8 hours a day, roughly 8.5 months out of the year...

I don't think arming teachers is even in the ballpark for answers, but I don't know if taking 8 hours out of officers' days is the best idea ever.

My point to this post is, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE BEST IDEA IS.

:3-1:


If we were to put one officer in every public school at that cost we'd be looking at ~$5B in costs nationwide. That's a cost of ~$78 per student and an additional 100,000 jobs. And considering a police officer at a school can do far more than just protect against mass violence (be a liaison, develop relationships with children, show kids they are the good guys), that's a 5B worth spending.

Or, we could put a costly training program together and have people who's main job is to be a teacher carry a gun all day at school.

_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Arm the teachers
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:13 pm 
* NET Curmudgeon *
* NET Curmudgeon *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 6791
Location: Eastern Washington
Osprey wrote:
No need to have a formal program just allow for concealed carry. Don't restrict it to teachers, allow any school employee to carry who qualifies for a CHL.
With the exception of Fort Hood every mass shooting in the US in the last 10yrs had been in a 'Gun Free' zone. The psychos who perpetrate these acts avoid an environment where someone might shoot back and often flee or commit suicide when confronted.

I think there would have to be a training program involved. While I agree with you that any adult with a CHL would be beneficial, the context of the school would make an armed-at-school program without the training would be politically unpalatable. Plus, people like SonicHawk would have their heads explode.


SonicHawk wrote:
If we were to put one officer in every public school at that cost we'd be looking at ~$5B in costs nationwide. That's a cost of ~$78 per student and an additional 100,000 jobs. And considering a police officer at a school can do far more than just protect against mass violence (be a liaison, develop relationships with children, show kids they are the good guys), that's a 5B worth spending.

Or, we could put a costly training program together and have people who's main job is to be a teacher carry a gun all day at school.

Just how costly do you think such a training program would be?

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ POLITICS, WAR & RELIGION FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.