Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Doesnt San Fran run the read option too?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:29 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5209
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
I wonder how we'll handle it....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doesnt San Fran run the read option too?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:49 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 1363
Go check out our game vs Carolina....They may be the best in the league at running it, and I think we handled it pretty well.

_________________
Image

"We all we got, we all we need"


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doesnt San Fran run the read option too?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:01 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:21 pm
Posts: 1343
doesn't work on us, ask cam.
plus we have super powers now, 50 pts (sarcasm....kinda)

_________________
We are the 2014 Superbowl champions and it can never, ever be taken away.
Greatest defense in NFL history.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doesnt San Fran run the read option too?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:14 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 1667
It's a HUGE rivalry division game. Nothing we look at will mean anything. Look at all of our games and look at our game against San Fran this year. We play each other like it's the Super Bowl. We will continue to do so and no other team will compare. It's basically the #1/#2 team in the league playing against each other. I'm saying that San Fran is #1, because they've already beaten us. It is going to be an insanely close game and one of us will win. There is no other possible prediction. And Carolina is NOT San Fran.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doesnt San Fran run the read option too?
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:57 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 3870
Location: Tri Cities, WA
they do, and i noticed they were running that pistol offense RG3 runs as well during the pats game... this really is a copycat league.. not talking trash just saying other teams really do take notice and see what's working and what's not..

_________________
World Champs - Sounds good don't it


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Doesnt San Fran run the read option too?
 Post Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:11 am 
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 1746
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Problem with looking at our performance vs Carolina is we had BB. No BB, no spectacular play where he stuffed the RB, and tackled/stripped the ball from Cam. That was one of the best plays I've ever seen from one of our players, and I will be damn happy to have BB back in the playoffs. Let's just hope we have Sherm too.

_________________
"I want to drink Ranier Beer out of a mug made from Jim harbaugh's hollowed out skull." CANHAWK


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 12thMan, 425HawkSpark, 4freakin9, bafloyd11, ballard1951, BC-Hawk, bigskydoc, bill21792, BobcatHawk, Brahn, CamanoIslandJQ, Cartire, cdn hawk fan, checkdanews, Cinque52, Crabhawk, Crizilla, ctrcat, danp1990, DavidSeven, DesiHawk, edogg23, EntiatHawk, entropyrulesall, etanate, Exploding, Floridahawk79, GawksAtHawks, Giblien, GoHawks, Google [Bot], gwinnUSAF77, HAWK-N-ROLL, Hawkfan77, hawknation2014, HawkNuts, HawksSoc, Hendo66, HHHTGT, Hobzen, hoxrox, HuskyHawk, Jac, JaiSeaSea, jake206, Jay-Dog, JKent82, JoeHawk80, joeseahawks, Jville, JZ#1, keatonisballin, kinesmajor, KK84, kodiakira, Laloosh, Landhawk1, Largefarva, lsheldon, Lynch'sLamborghini, MadSweeney, Manbearpig99, MD5eahawks, Meanbob, MichaelHawk70, Mick063, Minne, misfit, Missing_Clink, misTer, MookieB88, MSNbot Media, Natethegreat, NorthwestSportsFan, notyou, NYCoug, oldhawkfan, Onyx, Pick6, PlinytheCenter, pocketprotector, Polaris, Popeyejones, ratso, Recon_Hawk, RedAlice, richp01, rj503, RolandDeschain, SacHawk2.0, salukihawk12, samwize77, Scottemojo, seabowl, SeaChickN, seafence82, SeaMeat, SeatownJay, seedhawk, Sherminator, sjhawkfan, slincoln, slipwax, Smellyman, Smoke, Snakeeyes007, SNDavidson, SoCalHawksFan, Soppie, soxhawk, Sports Hernia, superdeluxe, sutz, SweTard, TheRealDTM, therealjohncarlson, tjgamer555, toadie_uk, Tokadub, TruHammer07, Uncle Si, usmSEAhawk, VancitySeahawk, VivaEfrenHerrera, warden, WilsonLegend, Yahoo [Bot], zhawk, ZornwasaleftY, Zukistubbs and 467 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.