More speculation about the appeal for Sherm

Barthawk

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
2,920
Reaction score
0
Location
San Antonio, TX by way of Kalispell, MT
Kenneth the Menneth ‏@KennethArthurS

SOURCE: #Seahawks corner Richard Sherman will claim urine sample was tainted when him and Brandon Browner "crossed swords".


This is a crock of crap... No way any responsible urinalysis collector would allow two people to provide their sample at the same time. I have done my fair share of piss tests in 20+ years in the Army and never has anyone else been in the collection area except for me and the "meat gazer".

I don't believe for one second that Sherman will be using this as his argument for pissing hot.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
22,952
Reaction score
2,774
Location
Anchorage, AK
Barthawk":bgwlqs2o said:
Kenneth the Menneth ‏@KennethArthurS

SOURCE: #Seahawks corner Richard Sherman will claim urine sample was tainted when him and Brandon Browner "crossed swords".


This is a crock of crap... No way any responsible urinalysis collector would allow two people to provide their sample at the same time. I have done my fair share of piss tests in 20+ years in the Army and never has anyone else been in the collection area except for me and the "meat gazer".

Well this wouldn't be the first "source" to make up a story for Sherman. Until Sherman says it's true, I'm not buying that it's his actual claim
 
OP
OP
Barthawk

Barthawk

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
2,920
Reaction score
0
Location
San Antonio, TX by way of Kalispell, MT
Greg- a contributor at Field Gulls.. I read it a little bit ago and waited to see if he responded with something more satirical but nothing..

If it was an attempt at humor, it was an extremely poor effort..
 

Fox0r

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 8, 2009
Messages
2,030
Reaction score
130
Location
Lynnwood, WA
You're telling me that a guy that went to Stanford would use this as the basis for his appeal? That post almost sounds like sarcasm to me.
 

FlyingGreg

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Barthawk":3lktn60w said:
Greg- a contributor at Field Gulls.. I read it a little bit ago and waited to see if he responded with something more satirical but nothing..

If it was an attempt at humor, it was an extremely poor effort..

Ahh, ok. I'm with you - I've also had endless piss tests during my Navy career, and you are right - it's you and the observer only.
 

SEC FAN

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2012
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
Barthawk":1h808g3t said:
Kenneth the Menneth ‏@KennethArthurS
SOURCE: #Seahawks corner Richard Sherman will claim urine sample was tainted when him and Brandon Browner "crossed swords".

I heard this joke before. It was in some movie called Saceballs I think.
 

JKent82

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
3,041
Reaction score
0
Kenneth's joking haha, follow him on twitter he's a crack up. And read more Fieldgulls you guys, they have good stuff these days.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,611
The tainted sample defense worked for Ryan Braun.


But I think the "crossed swords" defense only works if you didn't make eye contact.
 

HawkFan72

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
16,570
Reaction score
1
Location
Bay Area, CA
IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal.

But something tells me this is not a legitimate claim of Sherman's.
 

Seahwkgal

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,102
Reaction score
205
Whatever happened to innocent until "proven" guilty? Maybe, just maybe he is telling the truth.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,611
HawkFan72":3oc2mst1 said:
IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal.

If this was the case then why didn't Browner claim the same thing?
 

Seahwkgal

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,102
Reaction score
205
Sgt. Largent":2mybhaqs said:
HawkFan72":2mybhaqs said:
IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal.

If this was the case then why didn't Browner claim the same thing?
I am just speculating but maybe Browner was the one who was "dirty". Hence why there was no appeal or fight on the issue. IDK.
 

HawkFan72

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
16,570
Reaction score
1
Location
Bay Area, CA
Sgt. Largent":3u4g5cu7 said:
HawkFan72":3u4g5cu7 said:
IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal.

If this was the case then why didn't Browner claim the same thing?

Only one of them can claim they are tainted if that story is going to work. If both of them claim the other one was dirty, then that kind of takes away the point of the argument.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,611
HawkFan72":b1tchn6t said:
Sgt. Largent":b1tchn6t said:
HawkFan72":b1tchn6t said:
IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal.

If this was the case then why didn't Browner claim the same thing?

Only one of them can claim they are tainted if that story is going to work. If both of them claim the other one was dirty, then that kind of takes away the point of the argument.

I wonder if they drew straws to see who would be the tainter.
 

rideaducati

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
0
JKent82":178nqvw6 said:
Kenneth's joking haha, follow him on twitter he's a crack up. And read more Fieldgulls you guys, they have good stuff these days.

If you do go over to fieldgulls.com, don't disagree with the "groupthink" or they'll banish you from posting. They're very efficient in their banishing. The first time they disagree with you, some "staff" member will casually call you a name. When you state your case, many more "staff" members call you names and when you get into a back and forth with them, they ban you because you didn't agree with them. Fieldgulls is more of a Seahawk site for a few elitists that think they know more than they actually do.
 
Top