Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ POLITICS, WAR & RELIGION FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1025 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 52  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:29 pm 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6627
SonicHawk wrote:
I agree. Today was less about gun control and far more about mental health. We can argue about the macro result of gun control but today was preventable through mental health awareness, not gun control.


How do you fund that, communist?

_________________
@ryanadamdavis


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:32 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 12:01 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Yakima, WA
pehawk wrote:
The founding fathers would wipe their ass with the current 2nd amendment, and amend it. All this bullshit from the right about the founding fathers, is utter bullshit. All these same assholes who act like they know what the founding fathers meant 2nd amendment, think they were all Christians too. They DONT KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.

If anything, the founding fathers would take everyones guns and shoot every current Republican for being Christian nutjobs.


This certainly sounds extreme.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:34 pm 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6627
Davehawk wrote:
pehawk wrote:
The founding fathers would wipe their ass with the current 2nd amendment, and amend it. All this bullshit from the right about the founding fathers, is utter bullshit. All these same assholes who act like they know what the founding fathers meant 2nd amendment, think they were all Christians too. They DONT KNOW WHAT THE FUCK THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT.

If anything, the founding fathers would take everyones guns and shoot every current Republican for being Christian nutjobs.


This certainly sounds extreme.


Maybe, but the founding fathers would find any mixing of religion and politics treasonous. They'd also get rid of that the useless cockblock senate.

_________________
@ryanadamdavis


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:38 pm 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6627
Or, maybe we could ban children?

_________________
@ryanadamdavis


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:48 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 12:01 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Yakima, WA
pehawk wrote:
Or, maybe we could ban children?


Ok so Step 1 is Ban Guns.

What's Step 2?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:57 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2362
Stab people.

_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:58 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 12:01 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Yakima, WA
SonicHawk wrote:
Stab people.


With Assault Knives?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:00 pm 
NET Bench Warmer
Offline

Joined: Sat May 05, 2012 12:01 pm
Posts: 42
Location: Yakima, WA
Davehawk wrote:
SonicHawk wrote:
Stab people.


With Assault Knives?


I also call for the naming of all cars to be changed to "Assault Vehicles" as they commonly cause the deaths of untold numbers of people every year.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:06 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14070
Location: Kirkland, WA
Well, there are significantly more deaths from car wrecks every year than there are by guns.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lol.
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:28 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
Posts: 4726
Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
pehawk wrote:
SmokinHawk wrote:
We live in a society which fosters depravity and depraved behavior. I will never understand how even a delusional psychopath could commit such an atrocity. I will not rest easy tonight as I mourn not only the deaths of so many innocent children, but also the very erosion of human morality as I understand it.

What happened today isn't about guns. It's not about the availability of guns, or how powerful they are, or how many rounds you can crank off in 10 seconds. What happened today is a sign that there is something fundamentally broken in our country's system of values. Are we so self-involved that we are blind to the pain of others? People don't just suddenly go off the deep end and do something like this. It's cumulative, aggregate, builds over time. This was planned, premeditated, and isn't just something which happened as the result of a sudden breakdown. This guy was on a slow skid and nobody fucking cared to notice, not even his own goddamned mother, who was probably too wrapped up in watching reality TV to bother. Now, because of her negligence (and yes, I put this on her), she, along with nearly two dozen small children, are dead.

Sickening. Really, truly, gut-wrenchingly, sickening.


Programs designed to care or notice, or even offer this sick fuck help, cost money. Money that our society currently deems unnecessary. Its more important to show "concern" or "outrage" than actually prevent it. Maybe if counseling wasn't so expensive this guy would've sought help. Maybe if his high schools funding wasn't ripped to shreds, someone could've reached him. Maybe if college was more affordable, his life would've been different.

The problem is, in our current society its more important to post shit like you did, than to actually make a difference. Just look at this forum, there's morons up in arms over illegals getting .0000000001% of our tax dollars, nothing about the rest.

Everyone will act as if they mourn, but ask for a penny to prevent it, its whiny time. You get what you pay for.


So what have you done to actually make a difference? Seems like we're both just as powerless to actually change a goddamned thing.

_________________
Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:35 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2362
RolandDeschain wrote:
Well, there are significantly more deaths from car wrecks every year than there are by guns.


Cars aren't sold to people as items that kill things.

And anyways, I'm all for automating cars and driving.

_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:41 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:46 pm
Posts: 1805
Location: Florence, Italy
Hawkspur wrote:
RolandDeschain wrote:

Every school teacher should carry a pistol at all times and be extensively trained on its use, and you should have to pass a customized small arms training program to be eligible to even apply for a teaching certificate. That way the next time this happens, as soon as shooting starts, the teacher in the next room can come in and blow the asshole's head off.



WTF???

I'm a teacher (in a different country, granted) and find this idea absolutely abhorrent. Elementary and kindergarten teachers need to learn to kill people as part of their job spec? I sure as hell wouldn't sign up for that.

And also, what type of halfwit puts a load of loaded guns in a school (ie in the vicinity of children) on the infintesimal chance that some tragic event like today's happens?

My personal opinion is that I agree that more must be done to recognise and address mental health issues, but that many young men (mostly) in other countries have similar problems yet don't often get hold a gun and take out a whole lot of innocent people before killing themselves. My suspicion is that due to a lack of access to firearms that these people probably tend to kill themselves without killing anyone else. I don't know anybody apart from a couple of farmers who own guns. Nobody. And in the 3 countries I've lived in gun crime, especially involving schools/mass killings etc is relatively rare.

Criminals will always be able to get guns if they want them, but I think that they are less likely to kill innocent victims than they are other criminals if they were to use them. I personally doubt that many of these disturbed young men who've committed these school/shopping mall shootings would have actively approached criminals in order to buy themselves a gun. Some would, I'm sure, but I doubt it would have been many.

I really don't know how there is even an argument about whether shootings are more commonplace due to a lack of gun control legislation.

Gun control will not stop gun crime, but I'm pretty sure it would reduce it.


I think this is a very thought out and rational post. Thank you.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:43 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:46 pm
Posts: 1805
Location: Florence, Italy
RolandDeschain wrote:
Well, there are significantly more deaths from car wrecks every year than there are by guns.



You called Sonichawk a LIAR for linking homicide rates to guns because he was trying to "intentionally mislead" and then you introduce this red herring. Dude, today was the day you went off the

A) turn teachers into commandos
B) You are a liar if you don't agree with me

Deep End.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:52 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:46 pm
Posts: 1805
Location: Florence, Italy
RolandDeschain wrote:
Hawkspur wrote:
WTF???

I'm a teacher (in a different country, granted) and find this idea absolutely abhorrent. Elementary and kindergarten teachers need to learn to kill people as part of their job spec? I sure as hell wouldn't sign up for that.


Oh, don't be such a wuss. A 3rd of the entire world's countries have mandatory military service. You think all of those country's citizens whine about not wanting to be taught how to kill? We're just talking about becoming proficient with firing small arms. If that bothers you significantly, I don't know what to say, except that you have zero survival instinct.

I don't own any firearms, but everyone should know how to use them and be comfortable doing so. People have gotten too used to a "safe world", which is how you end up like that guy in Marysville or wherever it was that advertised jewelry for sale on craigslist a few years back, and a couple people came and held his family hostage, and he got killed.


@Sonic: You are a lying idiot. What you just quoted were universal homicide rates. What 12evanf said was countries like the U.K. that have much stricter gun control laws have much higher knife violence, and that's true. You're TWICE as likely to be stabbed in the U.K. as you are in the U.S. Look it up. Lying sack of shit, get the fuck outta this discussion if you're going to purposely try and deceive people.


Also, I agree with Montana that for a variety of uncommon reasons, Mexico is a poor example; but that being said, if most of their civilian population was armed, I dare say you'd see some small towns rise up against cartel violence. How many parents watching their kids get gunned down in the street do you think it takes before that happens?


Maybe you need to go talk to some elementary school teachers. Calling someone a "wuss" because he doesn't want a strap a gun on in his workplace is ridiculous. Additionally, your reasoning is because military conscription exists in 1/3 of the worlds countries we should force a similar system on our teachers? That seems like a great link. Today 20 five-year old were killed. I thus propose we start a militarization of our elementary school teacher force. If you don't agree you are a wuss. If you argue, I'll let you know that 1/3 of the world has military conscription! (And by the way, the only European countries that have military service are Switzerland, Denmark, Austria, Norway. All of which you can choose to work in the civilian sector instead)

And then you accuse Sonichawk of being a liar. WTF are you talking about?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 12:38 am 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Posts: 457
Location: Behind you
falcongoggles wrote:
RolandDeschain wrote:
Hawkspur wrote:
WTF???

I'm a teacher (in a different country, granted) and find this idea absolutely abhorrent. Elementary and kindergarten teachers need to learn to kill people as part of their job spec? I sure as hell wouldn't sign up for that.


Oh, don't be such a wuss. A 3rd of the entire world's countries have mandatory military service. You think all of those country's citizens whine about not wanting to be taught how to kill? We're just talking about becoming proficient with firing small arms. If that bothers you significantly, I don't know what to say, except that you have zero survival instinct.

I don't own any firearms, but everyone should know how to use them and be comfortable doing so. People have gotten too used to a "safe world", which is how you end up like that guy in Marysville or wherever it was that advertised jewelry for sale on craigslist a few years back, and a couple people came and held his family hostage, and he got killed.


@Sonic: You are a lying idiot. What you just quoted were universal homicide rates. What 12evanf said was countries like the U.K. that have much stricter gun control laws have much higher knife violence, and that's true. You're TWICE as likely to be stabbed in the U.K. as you are in the U.S. Look it up. Lying sack of shit, get the fuck outta this discussion if you're going to purposely try and deceive people.


Also, I agree with Montana that for a variety of uncommon reasons, Mexico is a poor example; but that being said, if most of their civilian population was armed, I dare say you'd see some small towns rise up against cartel violence. How many parents watching their kids get gunned down in the street do you think it takes before that happens?


Maybe you need to go talk to some elementary school teachers. Calling someone a "wuss" because he doesn't want a strap a gun on in his workplace is ridiculous. Additionally, your reasoning is because military conscription exists in 1/3 of the worlds countries we should force a similar system on our teachers? That seems like a great link. Today 20 five-year old were killed. I thus propose we start a militarization of our elementary school teacher force. If you don't agree you are a wuss. If you argue, I'll let you know that 1/3 of the world has military conscription! (And by the way, the only European countries that have military service are Switzerland, Denmark, Austria, Norway. All of which you can choose to work in the civilian sector instead)

And then you accuse Sonichawk of being a liar. WTF are you talking about?


I can only hope Roland is joking when he says he wants teachers with guns.
just what the fuck

_________________
Image
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:28 am 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 9964
Location: King In The North
If you compare guns to cars or drugs in the context of killing you are an idiot. Not just a regular idiot, but a complete and utter idiot. That's really all I have to add to this thread.

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹²


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lol.
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:16 am 
NET Practice Squad
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 3:45 am
Posts: 68
Location: BFEastern WA
pehawk wrote:
SmokinHawk wrote:
Seahawk Sailor wrote:
I've been seeing a ton of anti-gun rhetoric, and I think we'll see something drastic happen this time around regarding control and banning and such. It's going to happen. Private and government sentiment are largely for it. Take away our toys because we can't play with them right. And then guard our schools like Fort Fuckin' Knox, make the lil' guys like complete prisoners inside. And then when it happens again, what?

Fuck all is being said about why folks like this are going completely unnoticed until they explode, only to hear afterward that, yea, they had some serious issues nobody wanted to say shit about. God forbid we actually try to unfuck people. We're all special snowflakes, all different and unique in our own sometimes very twisted ways, and that's alright. Except that it's not.


We live in a society which fosters depravity and depraved behavior. I will never understand how even a delusional psychopath could commit such an atrocity. I will not rest easy tonight as I mourn not only the deaths of so many innocent children, but also the very erosion of human morality as I understand it.

What happened today isn't about guns. It's not about the availability of guns, or how powerful they are, or how many rounds you can crank off in 10 seconds. What happened today is a sign that there is something fundamentally broken in our country's system of values. Are we so self-involved that we are blind to the pain of others? People don't just suddenly go off the deep end and do something like this. It's cumulative, aggregate, builds over time. This was planned, premeditated, and isn't just something which happened as the result of a sudden breakdown. This guy was on a slow skid and nobody fucking cared to notice, not even his own goddamned mother, who was probably too wrapped up in watching reality TV to bother. Now, because of her negligence (and yes, I put this on her), she, along with nearly two dozen small children, are dead.

Sickening. Really, truly, gut-wrenchingly, sickening.


Programs designed to care or notice, or even offer this sick fuck help, cost money. Money that our society currently deems unnecessary. Its more important to show "concern" or "outrage" than actually prevent it. Maybe if counseling wasn't so expensive this guy would've sought help. Maybe if his high schools funding wasn't ripped to shreds, someone could've reached him. Maybe if college was more affordable, his life would've been different.

The problem is, in our current society its more important to post shit like you did, than to actually make a difference. Just look at this forum, there's morons up in arms over illegals getting .0000000001% of our tax dollars, nothing about the rest.

Everyone will act as if they mourn, but ask for a penny to prevent it, its whiny time. You get what you pay for.


I know I'm new to this forum, and pardon me for interrupting the deep thoughts of others, but it seems to me that we shouldn't be reliant on programs to make a difference. We should be the difference we seek. What the hell happened to personal responsibility? What happened to parental responsibility? I am a father of four and take great pride in educating my children on the things they (obviously) don't teach in schools anymore like how to take care of yourself, take responsibility of yourself and how to be humble, yet not be a victim. I teach my children to respect life. I teach them that their wants and desires are fine as long as they don't come at the expense of others. And somehow I find a way to do this while being a hunter and teaching my children responsible use and storage of firearms. IMHO I firmly belive that the problem with our great nation isn't that we have firearms, the problem is that a good portion of parents somehow thought that the system should be raising their kids for them instead of taking the time to take responsibility for what they have brought into the world. For the record, I am neither Republican or Democrat, and I think the Gov is doing a fine job of deviding the people. I am a veteran and a gun owner, though I don't see the need for AR type rifles in the hands of the civilian population, (besides, a man with a bolt action rifle and the skills to use it is better equipped anyway)or the need for extremely high capacity magazines on any weapon. I am a WA CPL holder and my sidearm of choice is a Ruger LCP. Purely a defensive handgun that I hope to never use, but I do know how to use it. I guess the moral of the story is, that until people can get their heads around personal responsibility and stop thinking that some government program is going to raise your kids for you/save the day/make your life more worth living, and on the other hand, stop thinking that all government imposed limitations are bad for liberty... (in other words, learn to compromise and use some damn common sense...) then we as a people are going to continue to see this thing we are a part of run itself into the ground.

_________________
Position Before Submission


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:35 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:08 am
Posts: 522
Location: Scotland
I hesitate to get involved in this, as I realise that it's sensitive and it's not my country we're talking about, but I just want to reiterate what Hawkspur is saying. I think we find it hard to understand the US debate as it seems to have to become tied up in polarised political opinions, but it is extremely disingenuous to suggest that there is no link between guns and violence.

Yes there are probably more deaths from stabbings in the UK. Why? Because there are no guns. If you want to hurt someone in the US, why carry a knife? It took me 30 seconds to find the death by violent crime statistics for each country. The US has 6.5 deaths per 100,000 from violent crime. More than Afghanistan. The UK has 1.1. The US is a wealthy and organised country, but I would be 6 times more likely to die a violent death if I lived there.

If you get caught carrying a gun in the UK, you will go to jail. The same is very likely if you get caught carrying a knife. Our police officers don't even carry guns as a rule, and you want to give them to teachers? To anyone from a country with no guns, that seems more than a little bizarre. As kobebryant said a couple of pages back, the genie is out of the bottle with regards to guns in the US, and whether you try to put it back depends upon your view of its effect on personal freedom and personal safety. But to refuse to have the argument based upon the thoughts of a few guys a couple of hundred years ago who coudln't have known the sophistication your country would achieve or what someone could do with an automatic weapon seems bizarre.

_________________
Machine-wrapped, with butter?

Yes, machine-wrapped, WITH BUTTER


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:35 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:03 am
Posts: 1774
Arming all teachers and teaching the to shoot to kill is indeed a bit extreme.

The MAJORITY (and by that I mean all but ONE) of school doors need to be locked during school hours too. And all doors should be able to open from the inside regardless of the door being locked or not.

All schools should also be like my daughters HS... during school hours there is only one way into the student population and that involves going through one set of doors from the outside and then going through another door into the main office. And then going through a door to get to the common areas. Three doors, and a shooter would need to get past several adults and doors before he can even see a kid.

I would suggest, as a last line of defense all schools are equipped with a system that would dispense a pretty large amount of tear gas into the hallways, and individual classrooms if need be.

Principals, secretaries and school counselors could control the entire system from a mobile phone. Teachers could do the same for their individual classrooms.

Enough of this gets in your eyes, especially in an enclosed area you really can't see. Breathing does suck and you have to be one hard son of a bitch to continue going on a focused killing spree. Sadly, this idea won't stop the initial killings but it may just stop it at four or five. Not upwards of 30.

I realize the tear gas solution is extreme, but it's not impossible. Similar sprinkler systems are installed in all public buildings to fight fire. So the basic technology is there.

_________________
Member formally known as AC59


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lol.
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:53 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 974
The Grouch wrote:
I know I'm new to this forum, and pardon me for interrupting the deep thoughts of others, but it seems to me that we shouldn't be reliant on programs to make a difference. We should be the difference we seek. What the hell happened to personal responsibility? What happened to parental responsibility?


You make a good point, but I can assure you that a lack of personal and parental responsibility is not exclusive to America. It is a huge problem in every country I've lived in. If we can teach all people to take responsibility for their thoughts and actions and have empathy then the world will be a far, far better place. But in the meantime, I'd rather not live somewhere where those who lack these qualities are allowed to carry guns in their pocket or glove compartment.

And Jiggy, schools in the UK are as you describe (minus the tear gas). The only door that is open is to the front office and you must be buzzed into the main building. There is an emergency services button in most school offices. Schools practice lockdown procedures to prepare for any event where unauthorised people are seen in the grounds. This is a result of the last (and possibly only?) school shooting in Dunblane in the mid 90s.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1025 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 52  Next

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ POLITICS, WAR & RELIGION FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.