| Author |
Message |
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol.  Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2365
|
RolandDeschain wrote: SonicHawk wrote: You think limiting access to guns isn't part of the solution? Limiting access to guns will fix the problem like limiting access to spoons will curb obesity. It is very obvious that limiting gun access will NOT fix anything. How do you plan to limit the access? If you're talking about street violence, the vast majority of those guns are illegally obtained as it is. There will be no effect there. 2/3rds (67.5) of all murders in the U.S. are perpetrated using a firearm, which means a 3rd are done via other means; you limit access to firearms, you'll just see more murders with things like knives. Here's another example. How well does limiting access to marijuana prevent people from smoking it in the 48 states where it's currently illegal? ...Yeah. All of your rebuttals are absolutely ridiculous. Honestly expected better from you Roland. I want to respond individually but your rebuttals are so bad I just get frustrated typing. You're not an 8 year old, you can figure out why. Spoons... weed? Get the fuck out of here.
_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:15 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9705
|
SonicHawk wrote: All of your rebuttals are absolutely ridiculous. Honestly expected better from you Roland.
I want to respond individually but your rebuttals are so bad I just get frustrated typing. You're not an 8 year old, you can figure out why.
Spoons... weed? Get the fuck out of here. Nice dodge. _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2365
|
|
Do I really need to refute every single stupid comment made?
_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
peachesenregalia
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:00 pm |
|
| * NET Starfish * |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 8782
Location: Vaes Dothrak
|
SonicHawk wrote: Do I really need to refute every single stupid comment made? Well, don't you expect others to refute all of your stupid comments?
_________________
FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:04 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2365
|
|
No. And they certainly don't.
_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:24 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9705
|
SonicHawk wrote: Do I really need to refute every single stupid comment made? "Your position is dumb because it just is, duh, can't you see that?" is the standard on this board, and it's why I rarely feel challenged in my positions. I personally don't see a lick of common sense in 90% of liberal planks. _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
fenderbender123
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:33 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 342
|
|
My friend was gonna shoot up the schools once.
I told him "dude, you do realize this is a gun-free zone, right?"
and he was like "oh yeah, dude. I wouldn't wanna violate school policy. Thanks for the warning."
and that, my friends, is how gun control prevents murders.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2365
|
|
Good point fendber... instead of trying to prevent things we should just let things happen freely, because if you can't prevent everything, you shouldn't try.
_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
falcongoggles
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:13 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:46 pm
Posts: 1805
Location: Florence, Italy
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: SonicHawk wrote: Do I really need to refute every single stupid comment made? "Your position is dumb because it just is, duh, can't you see that?" is the standard on this board, and it's why I rarely feel challenged in my positions. I personally don't see a lick of common sense in 90% of liberal planks. Congratulations! You are the best (according to you)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:38 am |
|
| * NET Expertise Expert * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14230
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
Sonic, you really are a moron. Typical liberal, everything is all or nothing.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:50 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2365
|
RolandDeschain wrote: Sonic, you really are a moron. Typical liberal, everything is all or nothing. Wait... I'm all or nothing? Aren't you the one who posted this picture?
_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jiggy
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:10 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:03 am
Posts: 1775
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DTexHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:35 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 3280
|
SonicHawk wrote: Good point fendber... instead of trying to prevent things we should just let things happen freely, because if you can't prevent everything, you shouldn't try. Yep, that's exactly what we do. 
_________________
That's weak sauce!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
LymonHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 10:45 am |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 4749
Location: Skagit County, WA
|
SonicHawk wrote: Good point fendber... instead of trying to prevent things we should just let things happen freely, because if you can't prevent everything, you shouldn't try. You are correct! And since folks are always going to drive illegally, why have any qualifications for driving a vehicle? Why have laws at all? Having laws doesn't stop everyone from breaking the laws?.....right?
_________________
If you're walking on thin ice, you might as well dance.................................................Mom
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:39 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16455
Location: SoCal
|
|
perfect time for an anti gun control thread. OK its too late, we as stupid humans have allowed people to make and distribute them so widely that it could never be controlled.
Sad day for guns and humans.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 12:57 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 10017
Location: King In The North
|
Jiggy wrote: Does this mean we should consider stricter knife control laws before this happens in the United States? Knife-wielding man injures 22 children in ChinaHe injured 22 people. He didn't KILL 27. This morning's news almost tips the scales for me. We obviously don't know how to handle our freedom. I'm not sure we deserve it anymore. _________________   Tanzania¹²
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jiggy
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:04 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:03 am
Posts: 1775
|
Zebulon Dak wrote: Jiggy wrote: Does this mean we should consider stricter knife control laws before this happens in the United States? Knife-wielding man injures 22 children in ChinaHe injured 22 people. He didn't KILL 27. This morning's news almost tips the scales for me. We obviously don't know how to handle our freedom. I'm not sure we deserve it anymore. And them 22 kids are going to be scarred physically and emotionally for years. Besides, what happened this morning in CT doesn't change my opinion. As long as fucked up people want to do fucked up things to other people. They will find a way. I will re-iterate for you here what I said in the thread about CT... 13 years after Columbine and this nation still fails to protects our kids at school.
_________________
Member formally known as AC59
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:10 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6183
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
Jiggy wrote: Zebulon Dak wrote: Jiggy wrote: Does this mean we should consider stricter knife control laws before this happens in the United States? Knife-wielding man injures 22 children in ChinaHe injured 22 people. He didn't KILL 27. This morning's news almost tips the scales for me. We obviously don't know how to handle our freedom. I'm not sure we deserve it anymore. And them 22 kids are going to be scarred physically and emotionally for years. I know that there are 22 kids and their families who will be grateful to even HAVE those years. And I guarantee you that there are some CT parents who would give every penny they have for the opportunity to care for a physically and emotionally scarred child right now. _________________  Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:11 pm |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 10359
Location: Portland, OR
|
Jiggy wrote: Zebulon Dak wrote: Jiggy wrote: Does this mean we should consider stricter knife control laws before this happens in the United States? Knife-wielding man injures 22 children in ChinaHe injured 22 people. He didn't KILL 27. This morning's news almost tips the scales for me. We obviously don't know how to handle our freedom. I'm not sure we deserve it anymore. And them 22 kids are going to be scarred physically and emotionally for years. Besides, what happened this morning in CT doesn't change my opinion. As long as fucked up people want to do fucked up things to other people. They will find a way. I will re-iterate for you here what I said in the thread about CT... 13 years after Columbine and this nation still fails to protects our kids at school. And how do you propose we protect our children at schools? Hire security officers armed with tasers or pistols to patrol every playground?
_________________
My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jiggy
|
Post subject: Re: Lol. Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:03 am
Posts: 1775
|
Sarlacc83 wrote: Jiggy wrote: And them 22 kids are going to be scarred physically and emotionally for years.
Besides, what happened this morning in CT doesn't change my opinion. As long as fucked up people want to do fucked up things to other people. They will find a way.
I will re-iterate for you here what I said in the thread about CT... 13 years after Columbine and this nation still fails to protects our kids at school. And how do you propose we protect our children at schools? Hire security officers armed with tasers or pistols to patrol every playground? Wouldn't be a bad first step. Hell my daughters High School already has a police officer assigned to it. His sole duty is to roam the halls of said high school. He interacts with the kids daily. Sure his primary job isn't to fend off would be attackers, it's to keep the kids in line. Since you brought it up, it seems you may have an issue with that type of approach. What do you want? More of the status quo?
_________________
Member formally known as AC59
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
