| Author |
Message |
|
ProckHawks
|
Post subject: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:35 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am Posts: 164 Location: Vancouver WA
|
|
I know that everyone after a loss loves to play "GM" and has the pefect plan to fix the problem. What about after a blowout win? You're only as good as your weakest link. Did anyone see somthing from last sunday that might need to be tweated next offseason?
For me DE and DT is still a big key. WR too.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
KitsapHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:37 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm Posts: 488 Location: Behind you
|
ProckHawks wrote: I know that everyone after a loss loves to play "GM" and has the pefect plan to fix the problem. What about after a blowout win? You're only as good as your weakest link. Did anyone see somthing from last sunday that might need to be tweated next offseason?
For me DE and DT is still a big key. WR too. I like our Wr's, do need a new interior lineman if Big Red 5 cant step it up.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
rastahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:40 pm |
|
| * Just Chillin' * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:51 am Posts: 744 Location: Los Angeles
|
|
Stop getting penalized! Come playoff time those are all precious yards.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
TaterHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:44 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:31 pm Posts: 56 Location: Duvall, WA
|
If we could just.... umm..well... I got nothing  how sweet it is
_________________ "Horse horse, did you see the size of that chicken?"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Bigpumpkin
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:50 pm |
|
| *GOLD SUPPORTER* |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm Posts: 3521 Location: Puyallup, WA USA
|
|
We'll all have more to say .....after we win the Super Bowl! If we bow out early...we'll have even more to say!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 3:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2210 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
replace Breno, his stupid penalties are ridiculous at this point. i know he's good at times but enough is enough
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Wenhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am Posts: 1288
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:14 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm Posts: 2541
|
|
A super bowl.
_________________ RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SacHawk2.0
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 4:40 pm |
|
| *Host of .NET Awards* |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm Posts: 5197
|
|
A fifth round QB that we can marinate for two years then flip for a first?
_________________ Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:34 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am Posts: 7393
|
|
I expect Seattle will have a "wide open" mentality in the first couple rounds this year. If you believe what John Schneider himself said after the draft, he was strongly considering safety Mark Barron as an option at #12 if he reached that pick- despite having two pro-bowl safeties already. That might sound crazy but really it shouldn't. If you truly believe in your bones that a player will be great for your team, he should be worth considering even if it means moving a good existing player to a new position (like Kam moving to big nickle safety or LB).
Without turning this into a draft post, IMO this doesn't look like a good year to take a 1st round DT, although there are some nice DE/LB options that could be in play. There is one WR and one TE I would love to see Seattle draft in round one- and I say that as someone that has always maintained that WR/TE were not needs for this team. I still don't think they are needs, but like the Mark Barron analogy, I don't care about need if it means getting a future pro-bowler.
So rather than pigeonholing O-line, D-line, or pass rush like Seattle has done in recent drafts, I think this year they will just draft players they really like. The only position I'd rule out completely in the first couple rounds is QB. I also have a hunch that O-line is at least somewhat unlikely, unless Giacomini is in the doghouse more than we know.
As far as free agency, I expect a very different year than last year. No big exciting moves will be likely when Seattle's current $13.5 million cap estimate likely won't even be enough to re-sign all of their existing free agents. I'd strongly prefer to keep both Jones and Branch, and if they did it would eat up most of their money in two in-house moves.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hawks46
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 5:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm Posts: 1753
|
|
Like Kearly said, I'm not seeing huge holes, which puts our FO in a good position.
Areas of upgrade:
Interior OL, RT, WR (I think a top notch rookie would be an upgrade over everyone from Baldwin on down), 3 Tech DT, OLB (this probably is the closest thing we have to a hole....Hill's getting old and Smith might not be the answer) and that's about it.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Navyhawkfan187
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am Posts: 509
|
|
I know after at least one penalty Pete was definitely screaming "Come on Breno!" Depending on how well Cable likes the guys he's got I could see RT as a spot the look at late in the 1st.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
BullHawk33
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:49 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 3:47 pm Posts: 34 Location: Puyallup
|
|
We drafted Carp as our RT of the future. We really should try that again. We are getting some great play out of our line even with everything considered. Cable is doing a good job playing the line to its strength and the opponents weakness.
Other than that, I think our FO has shown the past few seasons that they draft well and put the players in a position to be successful. I am starting to have confidence that they will take the best available each round for our team needs.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
warden
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm Posts: 1427
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
PlinytheCenter
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:47 pm Posts: 2182 Location: In Bruges
|
|
RT, WR, LB. We find three serviceable guys to fill these needs, everything else is just gravy. It's great knowing that JS/PC have a bead on potential talent and as a result, we can truly pick and choose at this point.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:25 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
|
Just more pass rush. we are good enough now, just keep funneling picks into pass rush. Pass rush+this secondary= ANNIHILATION
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawks4thewin
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:30 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:42 pm Posts: 403
|
|
Wide receiver is our weakness... rice is good, tate is good but there is a significant drop in production outside those two.. could you imagine tate being the slot guy... would be better than welker..
Like someone else said, I don't see any glaring weakness... and its to early to tell right now... OH the water boys are VERY SLOW... and swapping out shermans water with adderal water is NOT acceptable
_________________ --/*Seattle Seahawks*\--
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:48 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7443
|
|
We won't spend a high pick on a RT.
Early draft needs/wants. Another receiver to move Golden into the slot. A LB to replace Hill. A TE. More pass rush.
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Evil_Shenanigans
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:51 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:15 am Posts: 514
|
|
Need to solidify the O line, emphasis on health and smarts. Love you Giaco but the penalties have to end. Need some fast, smart, receivers with Hands the size of a catchers mitt and a willingness to throw a body now and then.
Another 6'3"+ DB to replace Sherman for a while and Trufant for the long haul.
Need a kicker with a 60 yard leg.
That is all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CamanoIslandJQ
|
Post subject: Re: Team needs. Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:11 am Posts: 818 Location: Camano Island, WA
|
|
I think it's a matter of printing out the current roster and looking at each player and position. From that list, which players need conpetition or outright replacement? I don't think the Hawks have any really huge needs this year.
To me, a rush DT is a fairly big need (first rounder=?) as well as replacements for Braylon at WR and Hill at LB are important and a TE upgrade of Moore & a RT upgrade of Breno would be nice. Beyond that, perhaps a DB or WR that can also return kicks could be an eventual replacement of Leon Washington. I suspect they may also want go with a cheaper alternative at the place kicker position. Backup players need to be constantly chalenged by draft picks and/or FA's in order to move into playing time situations and insure their overall development. So.... DT, WR, OLB, TE, RT, PK.
_________________ <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--> GO SEAHAWKS <--><--><--><--><--><--><--><--><-->
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thManNorth, AbsolutNET, Alkasquawlik, BCHawk, benthebeerman, Bill Assumpcao, BlueTalons, BoatsAndHose, Chapow, dbsn2420, drdiags, FormerEvil, Galen96, GawksAtHawks, Google [Bot], grizbob, H4WKSF4N, HansGruber, Hawknballs, hawksfansinceday1, HunnyBadger, IcedHawk, jammerhawk, Majestic-12 [Bot], MANUNITED23, NinerBuff, onanygivensunday, quadsas, RolandDeschain, Seahawks1Fan, SeahawksFanForever, Skeeve, Sonichellboy, Stephen SeaHawking, tacomahawk, taz291819, The Outfield, tjgamer555, twisted_steel2, VivaEfrenHerrera, Yoonhawk and 144 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |