 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 19 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Pete wasn't kidding...  Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:47 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm
Posts: 450
|
|
_________________
Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Aristotle22
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:53 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:48 pm
Posts: 386
|
|
This is fun to watch. It would be a shame f we did it one year early
|
|
| |
|
|
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 11:59 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
|
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm
Posts: 450
|
Aristotle22 wrote: This is fun to watch. It would be a shame f we did it one year early Big shame, funny how when Pete has his big ideas when you go and out do his optimism. What a shame!!!!  Btw go hawks   
_________________
Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rideaducati
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 1355
|
|
The way Pete talks about the team, even he is surprised at what John Schneider has been able to do with the roster in such a short time. I am very impressed with this new regime and how well they work together.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
tubbs51
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:32 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 8:10 pm
Posts: 306
Location: Spokane, Washington
|
|
Riddle me this, how many NFL Head Coaches can rebuild a team is as short of time as Pete and John?
Pretty amazing. The typical rebuild takes around 10 years, its year 3 for us and we are a playoff caliber team with a possiblity of reach the big game in New Orleans.
how freakin' awesome would it be if we won a (second) SB this year?
In Russell, Pete, and John I trust!
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:38 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5208
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
tubbs51 wrote: Riddle me this, how many NFL Head Coaches can rebuild a team is as short of time as Pete and John?
Pretty amazing. The typical rebuild takes around 10 years, its year 3 for us and we are a playoff caliber team with a possiblity of reach the big game in New Orleans.
how freakin' awesome would it be if we won a (second) SB this year?
In Russell, Pete, and John I trust! 10 years? lol
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:44 am |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 16573
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
Rebuilds don't take 10 years lol, yikes!!!!
What pete said wasn't any diffferent than most new regimes when they take over, 3-4 years for a total rebuild. Granted IMO what they have done is nothing short of amazing with how many Pro-bowl and almost pro-bowl caliber guys they've found throughout the draft and combing the streets.
I think the only thing different about this regime that they actually meant was that they'd build through the draft and let the depth determine starters rather than spend a fortune on a rental player who in a year or two's time will be useless. What we did before didn't work, we were paying players for what they did, and not making a wise investment on what they would do. This model they have now is almost like what they do in Pittsburgh, pay the guys that deserve it and can help you in the future, the days of holding onto a player well past their prime is over.
_________________  3elieve
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SalishHawkFan
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4169
|
|
Always compete! Pete's competing with his projection, trying to outdo himself.
_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.
R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:46 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 10812
Location: Antioch, CA
|
|
Did we give Schneider a promotion?
I saw on .com that he is the Executive Vice President/GM. I thought he was only hired to be the GM? Did we give him a promotion in his title so that he won't be poached by other teams? Or was he always the Executive VP?
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HOLLYWOOD
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:52 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 7:56 am
Posts: 405
Location: Closer than you think...
|
|
Very very pleased with the organization. To think not that long ago we were dealing with Ruskell and Mora.. (shudder)..
I love Pete but John needs major props too.. Promote him for sure. We now have our QBOTF.. And loaded with young talent with sky high potential.
Bo Duke and Slippery Pete have my full confidence.. 8-)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hidn
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 8:53 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 3:18 pm
Posts: 484
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
|
|
It really is nice to see this team competing at a higher level.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:34 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 3870
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
skater18000 wrote: Aristotle22 wrote: This is fun to watch. It would be a shame f we did it one year early Big shame, funny how when Pete has his big ideas when you go and out do his optimism. What a shame!!!! Btw go hawks HUH????? 
_________________
World Champs - Sounds good don't it
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:39 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 9835
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
The team is a year ahead of schedule because Russ is developing much faster than even they anticipated. I don't think Pete and John even thought they would get their QB by now considering they signed Flynn. He was meant to be a bridge QB IMO.
_________________ From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands  Proud member of the 38 Club
|
|
| |
|
|
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:41 am |
|
| NET Starter |
|
|
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm
Posts: 450
|
hawker84 wrote: skater18000 wrote: Aristotle22 wrote: This is fun to watch. It would be a shame f we did it one year early Big shame, funny how when Pete has his big ideas when you go and out do his optimism. What a shame!!!! Btw go hawks HUH????? It was a joke...
_________________
Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 3870
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
 still don't get it??
_________________
World Champs - Sounds good don't it
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawksfan78
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:51 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 7:13 am
Posts: 122
|
|
Skater, I thought you were talking about it was a shame we didnt bring in Pete and JS the year Mora was HC, instead of the year after.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign37now
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 9:56 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 4:49 am
Posts: 195
|
|
RG3 RG3 RG3 RG3 RG3... Back to reality guys. It's all about RG3. Jesus, aren't you watching TV? Who cares if the Seahawks win a Superbowl? Look how cool RG3 is..........
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 10:11 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 9835
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
Sign37now wrote: RG3 RG3 RG3 RG3 RG3... Back to reality guys. It's all about RG3. Jesus, aren't you watching TV? Who cares if the Seahawks win a Superbowl? Look how cool RG3 is.......... And don't forget THE COWBOYS!! THE COWBOYS ARE STILL IN CONTENTION FOR A PLAYOFF BERTH!! COWBOYS COWBOYS COWBOYS COWBOYS COWBOYS COWBOYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! _________________ From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands Proud member of the 38 Club
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawk-A-Loogie
|
Post subject: Re: Pete wasn't kidding... Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:06 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:44 pm
Posts: 278
Location: Washington
|
Throwdown wrote: Rebuilds don't take 10 years lol, yikes!!!!
What pete said wasn't any diffferent than most new regimes when they take over, 3-4 years for a total rebuild. Granted IMO what they have done is nothing short of amazing with how many Pro-bowl and almost pro-bowl caliber guys they've found throughout the draft and combing the streets.
I think the only thing different about this regime that they actually meant was that they'd build through the draft and let the depth determine starters rather than spend a fortune on a rental player who in a year or two's time will be useless. What we did before didn't work, we were paying players for what they did, and not making a wise investment on what they would do. This model they have now is almost like what they do in Pittsburgh, pay the guys that deserve it and can help you in the future, the days of holding onto a player well past their prime is over. Tell that to the Raiders.
_________________
TOUCHDOWN SEAHAWKS!!!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 19 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: 45Hawker, 707HAWKfan, 98pack_09hawks, AbsolutNET, aredub, AsylumGuido, BAJAHAWK, ballard1951, BeaHUman, bearhawk, BHF, Bigbadhawk, Bitter, BoatsAndHose, Bobblehead, Brahn, bryantology79, canfan, CANHawk, Canhawks, canucklhead, ChiefHawk, chihawk, chrispy, Chrome_Seahawk, Cinque52, coach78, conman14, CPHawk, CurryStopstheRuns, davidonmi, DavidSeven, djTOY2000, DJ_CJ, drcool, edogg23, ensett, ErikG803, EverydayImRusselin, Exploding, Filydan, Floridahawk79, flyingHigh, fridayfrenzy, Fudwamper, G-Money, gargantual, GCrow, Geezerhawk, Google [Bot], Greenhell, grizbob, hambaggers, Hasselbeck, HawkFanNC, HawkinNY, HawkMeat, hawknation2014, Hawknight, hawksfan515, Hawksnutt12, HawksSoc, Hendo66, Highlordb, hyrailyn, IcedHawk, Incubus, irfuben32, Jase, jblaze, Jdm675, Jeremy517, JimmyB3, JimZorn10, jsmc, Justwin, King Dog, KK84, Largent80, longsh0t, MagHawk, ManBunts, Marlin Man, McG, McGruff, mikeak, Milehighhawk, Missing_Clink, MizzouHawks, MPLogick, MVP53, nepahawk, NYCoug, oasis, okhawkfan, OLYhawks, Onyx, Our Man in Chicago, peachesenregalia, Penman96, purpleworld, Recon_Hawk, rightbench, RolandDeschain, seahawks08, SeahawksMSHing, Seahwkgal, SeatownJay, Sgt. Largent, SHOCKER315, SilNWest, silvergun, six sigma, Skottt, smoothmaw, SonicHawk, SoulfishHawk, soxhawk, Starrman44, stevensarima, streets24, suppaball, Swedishhawkfan, TDOTSEAHAWK, Terpdragon, thaima1shu, thecycle, TheGreenMan, Throwdown, Tical21, tmartin1313, TXHawk, Uncle Si, Veilside, vin.couve12, Wartooth, WindCityHawk, Xarbx425, ZagHawk, Zybot and 513 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
