| Author |
Message |
|
ProckHawks
|
Post subject: Baby Willis vs Big Willis  Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:43 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am
Posts: 163
Location: Vancouver WA
|
|
I know stats don't always tell the truth. I've seen both players play alot this season and looking at both of their stats. Bobby Wagner is out performing Patrick Willis this year.
2012 stats:
Wagner
Tackles 109
Sacks 2
INTS 3
FF 0
Willis
Tackles 99
Sacks 0
INTS 1
FF 2
Willis rookie stats
Tackles 174
Sacks 4
INTS 0
FF 2
Wagner is projected at this point to have at seasons end.
Tackles 142
Sacks 4
INTS 4
FF 1
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
vin.couve12
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:46 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 10:19 am
Posts: 786
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
Would like to drop the Baby Willis stuff, honestly. Dude will make his own name.
But yeah....hell of a good player.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ProckHawks
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:52 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am
Posts: 163
Location: Vancouver WA
|
|
lol I'm not a huge fan of the "Baby Willis" name either. Remember tho, Willis was compared to Ray Lewis for his first couple years in the NFL. I ever heard the names "Baby Lewis" "Lil Ray Ray" and "A Young Ray Lewis." From one Hall of Fame play to another. It's not bad by anymeans to be called a younger version of a Hall a Fame player like Willis.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
vin.couve12
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:56 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 10:19 am
Posts: 786
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
ProckHawks wrote: lol I'm not a huge fan of the "Baby Willis" name either. Remember tho, Willis was compared to Ray Lewis for his first couple years in the NFL. I ever heard the names "Baby Lewis" "Lil Ray Ray" and "A Young Ray Lewis." From one Hall of Fame play to another. It's not bad by anymeans to be called a younger version of a Hall a Fame player like Willis. Yeah, understood. However I don't think I'd call Willis a HOFer just yet. He's got to have a high, high level for 10+ years. Being good is one thing, longevity in the NFL is completely different. Body wears down. Yeah, I get your point though.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
vin.couve12
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:00 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 10:19 am
Posts: 786
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
Swagner cracks me up. Could use a better one, but that makes me laugh.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:04 am |
|
| * NET Expertise Expert * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14230
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
vin.couve12 wrote: Swagner cracks me up. Rofl, I agree.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:32 pm |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11345
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
What about Bowmans stats? What are they looking like?
_________________  Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawkstorian
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:35 pm |
|
| * NET Staff * |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 am
Posts: 2171
Location: Spokane
|
|
As a poster, I dub you "Baby Hawkstorian".
_________________
This post is intended for entertainment purposes only.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:42 pm |
|
| * NET Expertise Expert * |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14230
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
Throwdown wrote: What about Bowmans stats? What are they looking like? Mildly sunny with a chance of rainbows. 116 tackles, (good number) 2.0 sacks, 0 forced fumbles, 1 interception. Considering how dominant their D-line is, I'd expect more of the non-tackle stats, since he's allowed to run wild a lot of the time. *shrug*
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawk-A-Loogie
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:46 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:44 pm
Posts: 189
Location: Washington
|
vin.couve12 wrote: Would like to drop the Baby Willis stuff, honestly. Dude will make his own name.
But yeah....hell of a good player. THIS.
_________________
TOUCHDOWN SEAHAWKS!!!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawks46
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:43 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 1697
|
|
Yea, I was gonna say, Bowman is so good, he's probably taking stats from Willis. We also run 3 LBers and they run 4.....so that's more people to split stuff up....like sacks. Aldon Smith is gonna get more of those than either Bowman or Willis, and it scews them down.
Wagner is good, but not as good as Willis yet. Find me some numbers on passes defensed. WIllis is better in coverge, and is more run gap disciplined at this point, but I'm loving Wagner's progression.
Also, the 174 tackle numbers.....there was some controversy as to how tackles were being assigned to Willis at one point if I remember right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawken-Dazs
|
Post subject: Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:50 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:50 pm
Posts: 407
|
|
Just to piss off Niner fans, I'll refer to Willis as Lil Ray Ray from now on.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
