Baby Willis vs Big Willis

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:43 am
  • I know stats don't always tell the truth. I've seen both players play alot this season and looking at both of their stats. Bobby Wagner is out performing Patrick Willis this year.

    2012 stats:

    Wagner

    Tackles 109

    Sacks 2

    INTS 3

    FF 0

    Willis

    Tackles 99

    Sacks 0

    INTS 1

    FF 2

    Willis rookie stats

    Tackles 174

    Sacks 4

    INTS 0

    FF 2

    Wagner is projected at this point to have at seasons end.

    Tackles 142

    Sacks 4

    INTS 4

    FF 1
    ProckHawks
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 167
    Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am
    Location: Vancouver WA


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:46 am
  • Would like to drop the Baby Willis stuff, honestly. Dude will make his own name.

    But yeah....hell of a good player.
    User avatar
    vin.couve12
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1183
    Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 10:19 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:52 am
  • lol I'm not a huge fan of the "Baby Willis" name either. Remember tho, Willis was compared to Ray Lewis for his first couple years in the NFL. I ever heard the names "Baby Lewis" "Lil Ray Ray" and "A Young Ray Lewis." From one Hall of Fame play to another. It's not bad by anymeans to be called a younger version of a Hall a Fame player like Willis.
    ProckHawks
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 167
    Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:45 am
    Location: Vancouver WA


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:56 am
  • ProckHawks wrote:lol I'm not a huge fan of the "Baby Willis" name either. Remember tho, Willis was compared to Ray Lewis for his first couple years in the NFL. I ever heard the names "Baby Lewis" "Lil Ray Ray" and "A Young Ray Lewis." From one Hall of Fame play to another. It's not bad by anymeans to be called a younger version of a Hall a Fame player like Willis.


    Yeah, understood. However I don't think I'd call Willis a HOFer just yet. He's got to have a high, high level for 10+ years. Being good is one thing, longevity in the NFL is completely different. Body wears down.

    Yeah, I get your point though.
    User avatar
    vin.couve12
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1183
    Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 10:19 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:00 am
  • Swagner cracks me up. Could use a better one, but that makes me laugh.
    User avatar
    vin.couve12
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1183
    Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 10:19 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:04 am
  • vin.couve12 wrote:Swagner cracks me up.

    Rofl, I agree.
    Rams bet status: honored. Bradford still sucks.
    RedAlice is right.
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 24164
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:32 pm
  • What about Bowmans stats? What are they looking like?
    Image
    3elieve
    User avatar
    Throwdown
    * NET Baller *
     
    Posts: 18801
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:35 pm
  • As a poster, I dub you "Baby Hawkstorian".
    _______________________
    Remember, it's all for fun.
    User avatar
    Hawkstorian
    * NET Staff *
     
    Posts: 2905
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 am
    Location: Spokane


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:42 pm
  • Throwdown wrote:What about Bowmans stats? What are they looking like?


    Mildly sunny with a chance of rainbows.

    116 tackles, (good number) 2.0 sacks, 0 forced fumbles, 1 interception. Considering how dominant their D-line is, I'd expect more of the non-tackle stats, since he's allowed to run wild a lot of the time. *shrug*
    Rams bet status: honored. Bradford still sucks.
    RedAlice is right.
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 24164
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 12:46 pm
  • vin.couve12 wrote:Would like to drop the Baby Willis stuff, honestly. Dude will make his own name.

    But yeah....hell of a good player.


    THIS.
    TOUCHDOWN SEAHAWKS!!!
    User avatar
    Hawk-A-Loogie
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 290
    Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:44 pm
    Location: Washington


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:43 pm
  • Yea, I was gonna say, Bowman is so good, he's probably taking stats from Willis. We also run 3 LBers and they run 4.....so that's more people to split stuff up....like sacks. Aldon Smith is gonna get more of those than either Bowman or Willis, and it scews them down.

    Wagner is good, but not as good as Willis yet. Find me some numbers on passes defensed. WIllis is better in coverge, and is more run gap disciplined at this point, but I'm loving Wagner's progression.

    Also, the 174 tackle numbers.....there was some controversy as to how tackles were being assigned to Willis at one point if I remember right.
    Hawks46
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3344
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm


Re: Baby Willis vs Big Willis
Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:50 pm
  • Just to piss off Niner fans, I'll refer to Willis as Lil Ray Ray from now on.
    Image
    "I'm not the type to let a sleeping giant lie. I wake up the giant, slap him around, make him mad and beat him to the ground. I talk a big game because I carry a big stick." --- All-Pro Stanford Graduate
    User avatar
    Hawken-Dazs
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 600
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:50 pm




It is currently Tue Jul 29, 2014 5:00 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online