 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: 284 yards rushing  Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 2:53 am |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4877
|
Lynch 128 Turbin 108 Leon 38 Russell 12 Flynn -2  It should have been 286 yards. That said, Arizona is ranked 30th in rush defense at 140 yards per game, but that can be misleading since teams have been running the ball at them to run out the clock. The Cardinals have a very good defense, but they are probably getting worn down. They are ranked 5th overall passing defense 197 yards per game, but again, how much have teams run at them versus thrown at them. That's why I dislike yards as a metric for defense. If we instead go by points per game, AZ has averaged 22.5 ppg which is decent. SF is #1 in defense in ppg at 14.2 Seattle is #2 in ppg defense at 15.5 The only other teams below 20 ppg are Denver 19.8, Chicago 16.8, Houston 18.4, and Atlanta 19.9. Strangely the #1 ranked defense, Pittsburr allows 20.3 ppg. I think I prefer DVOA. _________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
  |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: 284 yards rushing Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:40 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
|
DVOA is much better, no arguments there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: 284 yards rushing Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 993
Location: The 5-0
|
|
These clown writers (etc) that want to slam us for running the score up, only need to see our rushing yards to understand it was Zona that ran the score up...against themselves.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Shadowhawk
|
Post subject: Re: 284 yards rushing Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:38 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 623
|
|
According to ESPN.com, 214 of those rushing yards came before contact.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: 284 yards rushing Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:42 pm |
|
| * NET Expertise Expert * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14250
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
ivotuk wrote: I think I prefer DVOA. DVOA is superior to like, everything else out there. You should read up on how they calculate some of that stuff. Football Outsiders is like .NET, but for NFL stats. Love the place.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: 284 yards rushing Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:15 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4877
|
Shadowhawk wrote: According to ESPN.com, 214 of those rushing yards came before contact. That, is unreal. n  _________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: 284 yards rushing Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 7:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 993
Location: The 5-0
|
Shadowhawk wrote: According to ESPN.com, 214 of those rushing yards came before contact. THAT would be my favorite stat of the game. Usually I think it's just about opposite, which causes Lynch to get older with every carry. Good job O-line.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 7 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: AbsolutNET, anewby, BallHawker, Big D, Bill Assumpcao, blue 22, BlueTalon, BoatsAndHose, Bobblehead, bryantology79, Cartire, Chrome_Seahawk, cnjvh, cubbyhawkfan, dbmack, fisholot, Floridahawk79, geoff21, getnasty, Giedi, Google [Bot], goseahawks2012, HawkFan72, HawkGA, HunnyBadger, MaverickHawk, McGruff, Missing_Clink, onanygivensunday, PDX12, QuickLightning, red17hawk, Seabean, Seahawk_Dan, SeaMeat, Shaz, SilNWest, Skeeve, Smoke, Spleenhawk2.0, stickman1966, T-Sizzle, themunn, Throwdown, TwilightError, twisted_steel2, warden, WindCityHawk, Zukistubbs and 190 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
