| Author |
Message |
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen
|
Post subject: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:37 pm |
|
| * NET Injury Guru * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am Posts: 1174 Location: Poulsbo, WA
|
|
First, let me say that I was at the game, and the only replay I was able to see was the one they showed at the stadium. However, I thought both when I saw it live and when I saw the replays that it was a total B******* call. It didn't look like helmet to helmet to me, nor a shot to the head. I thought that Rice just got lit up on a good solid football play. If I'm wrong and there was a shot to the head then that's fine. But if not, it absolutely pisses me off that the NFL is becoming such a pansy league. What was the safety supposed to do? Go lower, at his knees? Not hit him at all, just let him go? It's the same thing I thought about the call that went against ET on Tannehill a couple of weeks ago. It's just makes me want to puke.
_________________ The NFL need to start fining QB's that throw the ball across my middle... #DangerZone -Kam Chancellor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 691 Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
|
I heard that after the game Rice said it was a clean hit.
_________________ "It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
AbsolutNET
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:38 pm |
|
| * NET X's & O's Guru * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am Posts: 6806 Location: PNW
|
|
I agree its a lousy rule, but that's how it's supposed to be called. Defenseless receiver regardless of helmet contact.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:38 pm |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am Posts: 16311 Location: Bothell
|
|
Ticky-tack call on a bang-bang play. Easy enough to call, especially with today's white glove treatment of players. Probably shouldn't have been called, but if they're calling stuff like that on ET, then call it on Seahawks opponents too.
_________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm Posts: 1434
|
|
That was a bad call. That was a football play. If Goodell wants anything else then he can buy tickets to the ice capades.
_________________ I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sports Hernia
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:41 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm Posts: 5424
|
|
Its a crap rule and a crap call, welcome to Rog Goodell's NFFL (National FLAG Football League)
_________________ Hugh Millen = CBJ minus the cool beard
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bluengreen
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:19 pm Posts: 688
|
|
I thought it was a bad call as well, he hit with his shoulder.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:43 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm Posts: 993 Location: The 5-0
|
|
Terrible call. Saw one in the Cowboy game even worse. On that play, the DB hit the WR in the chest with his shoulder and dislodged the ball. Wasted effort as he was flagged with the play resulting in a 1st down. Sickening. The Easleys and Lotts could'nt afford to play in today's NFL. Their fines would be bigger than their game checks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
TundraApe
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:46 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:39 am Posts: 431
|
|
It was clean. There was a similar call against the Bengals when there safety stuck Dez Bryant. I blame Goodall. Since he became commish, the NFL product has become softer and is moving towards Two Hand Touch. In fifty years it will be called the THT League. Sad.
_________________ Doug Baldwin does nothing but Save QB's!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
run and shoot
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:50 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:43 am Posts: 61
|
|
Like they said bad call, but not the most blatant bad call on a hit of the night.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bingotown
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:56 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:52 am Posts: 89
|
|
Loved the hit, hated the call
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
scutterhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm Posts: 2098
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote: First, let me say that I was at the game, and the only replay I was able to see was the one they showed at the stadium. However, I thought both when I saw it live and when I saw the replays that it was a total B******* call. It didn't look like helmet to helmet to me, nor a shot to the head. I thought that Rice just got lit up on a good solid football play. If I'm wrong and there was a shot to the head then that's fine. But if not, it absolutely pisses me off that the NFL is becoming such a pansy league. What was the safety supposed to do? Go lower, at his knees? Not hit him at all, just let him go? It's the same thing I thought about the call that went against ET on Tannehill a couple of weeks ago. It's just makes me want to puke. The hit reminded me of the hit by Tate on that Cowboy Defender---Defenseless? It is getting a bit silly with these calls by the Refs nowdays what the hell's next?, never mind, I don't really want to know.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sturg78
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm Posts: 895
|
|
It was a great hit. If that was Kam we would be bitching the world on fire.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Rafi
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:06 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:26 am Posts: 54
|
|
The only thing I was thinking is why the hell is Rice still in the game?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm Posts: 1391
|
Remember you only get to dress 45 players you can't sit everybody.... What I didn't like was a pass over the middle like that considering the situation. Clean hit no helmet to helmet bad call IMHO With that said every player on my FF team sucked today but the seahawks defense gave me the win with 2 pts  so glad they kept playing!!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SonicHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:01 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm Posts: 2365
|
|
It wasn't a bad call its a bad rule. Although Flynn basically set his receiver up on an unnecessary situation.
_________________ RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Waterhawk1
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:58 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:40 am Posts: 252
|
|
Like Deon Sanders said "Defensless? He went out there in his uniform and pads". Talking about the Cowboys hit on the Bengals receiver. Absolutely right on!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Bigpumpkin
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:32 am |
|
| *GOLD SUPPORTER* |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm Posts: 3472 Location: Puyallup, WA USA
|
|
An unnecessary call IMHO. Clearly showing a trend toward a "flag football league". The number of flags in yesterday's game was rediculous.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
nsport
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:13 am |
|
| * NET Sports Handicapper * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am Posts: 971
|
|
It was a solid hit, and had Rice been allowed a couple more steps I would definitely be supporting most of you in your decision that it is a bad call. The rule was stated as defenseless player - meaning he didn't have an opportunity to brace to be clobbered. With the hit he took, he could have easily been hurt due to the reaction time issue. I support the call - it had nothing to do with helmet to helmet, more it was Rice's ability to defend himself from the hit.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
RichNhansom
|
Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:16 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am Posts: 1862
|
|
Wasn't that the play that Flynn escaped a sack and threw on the run? If I am right (and I think I am) then it's kind of hard to blame the hit on Flynn.
I also thought the call was horrible. Reminded me of Brownser's hit on Welker. As long as thete is no helmet to helmet, there shouldn't be a flag. Otherwise your ruining the game.
_________________ "cheating", Eddie D. pled to a FELONY to avoid prison and paid players under the table. Brent Jones was paid 500k the year after he stopped playing for "services" in the 90's.. Of course, there is Carmen Policy also
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: AgentDib, bestfightstory, Bill Assumpcao, CALIHAWK1, Cirmman, dbmack, fisholot, geoff21, Google [Bot], grizbob, gwinnUSAF77, hawk45, HawksSoc, MaverickHawk, McGruff, Milehighhawk, Morpheus08, nIdahoSeahawk, nsport, rightbench, ruffENrowdy, Seahawksfan425, Seanhawk, Spounge84, Stiletto, therealjohncarlson, WestcoastSteve, Yoonhawk and 119 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |