Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:37 pm 
* NET Injury Guru *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am
Posts: 1174
Location: Poulsbo, WA
First, let me say that I was at the game, and the only replay I was able to see was the one they showed at the stadium. However, I thought both when I saw it live and when I saw the replays that it was a total B******* call. It didn't look like helmet to helmet to me, nor a shot to the head. I thought that Rice just got lit up on a good solid football play. If I'm wrong and there was a shot to the head then that's fine.
But if not, it absolutely pisses me off that the NFL is becoming such a pansy league. What was the safety supposed to do? Go lower, at his knees? Not hit him at all, just let him go? It's the same thing I thought about the call that went against ET on Tannehill a couple of weeks ago. It's just makes me want to puke.

_________________
Image

The NFL need to start fining QB's that throw the ball across my middle... #DangerZone -Kam Chancellor



Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:37 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 665
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
I heard that after the game Rice said it was a clean hit.

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:38 pm 
* NET X's & O's Guru *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 6775
Location: PNW
I agree its a lousy rule, but that's how it's supposed to be called. Defenseless receiver regardless of helmet contact.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:38 pm 
* Navy Badass *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16253
Location: Bothell
Ticky-tack call on a bang-bang play. Easy enough to call, especially with today's white glove treatment of players. Probably shouldn't have been called, but if they're calling stuff like that on ET, then call it on Seahawks opponents too.

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:39 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1427
That was a bad call. That was a football play. If Goodell wants anything else then he can buy tickets to the ice capades.

_________________
I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:41 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
Posts: 5384
Its a crap rule and a crap call, welcome to Rog Goodell's NFFL (National FLAG Football League)

_________________
Hugh Millen = CBJ minus the cool beard


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:42 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:19 pm
Posts: 688
I thought it was a bad call as well, he hit with his shoulder.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:43 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 981
Location: The 5-0
Terrible call. Saw one in the Cowboy game even worse. On that play, the DB hit the WR in the chest with his shoulder and dislodged the ball. Wasted effort as he was flagged with the play resulting in a 1st down. Sickening. The Easleys and Lotts could'nt afford to play in today's NFL. Their fines would be bigger than their game checks.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:46 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 11:39 am
Posts: 431
It was clean. There was a similar call against the Bengals when there safety stuck Dez Bryant. I blame Goodall. Since he became commish, the NFL product has become softer and is moving towards Two Hand Touch. In fifty years it will be called the THT League. Sad.

_________________
Doug Baldwin does nothing but Save QB's!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:50 pm 
NET Practice Squad
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 8:43 am
Posts: 61
Like they said bad call, but not the most blatant bad call on a hit of the night.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 7:56 pm 
NET Practice Squad
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:52 am
Posts: 89
Loved the hit, hated the call


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:03 pm 
NET Veteran
Online

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 2079
IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote:
First, let me say that I was at the game, and the only replay I was able to see was the one they showed at the stadium. However, I thought both when I saw it live and when I saw the replays that it was a total B******* call. It didn't look like helmet to helmet to me, nor a shot to the head. I thought that Rice just got lit up on a good solid football play. If I'm wrong and there was a shot to the head then that's fine.
But if not, it absolutely pisses me off that the NFL is becoming such a pansy league. What was the safety supposed to do? Go lower, at his knees? Not hit him at all, just let him go? It's the same thing I thought about the call that went against ET on Tannehill a couple of weeks ago. It's just makes me want to puke.

The hit reminded me of the hit by Tate on that Cowboy Defender---Defenseless? :177692:
It is getting a bit silly with these calls by the Refs nowdays what the hell's next?, never mind, I don't really want to know.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:03 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm
Posts: 893
It was a great hit. If that was Kam we would be bitching the world on fire.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:06 pm 
NET Practice Squad
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 11:26 am
Posts: 54
The only thing I was thinking is why the hell is Rice still in the game?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2012 11:56 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 1390
Remember you only get to dress 45 players you can't sit everybody....

What I didn't like was a pass over the middle like that considering the situation.

Clean hit no helmet to helmet bad call IMHO

With that said every player on my FF team sucked today but the seahawks defense gave me the win with 2 pts :) so glad they kept playing!!!!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:01 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm
Posts: 2362
It wasn't a bad call its a bad rule. Although Flynn basically set his receiver up on an unnecessary situation.

_________________
RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 4:58 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:40 am
Posts: 252
Like Deon Sanders said "Defensless? He went out there in his uniform and pads". Talking about the Cowboys hit on the Bengals receiver. Absolutely right on!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 5:32 am 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 3462
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
An unnecessary call IMHO. Clearly showing a trend toward a "flag football league". The number of flags in yesterday's game was rediculous.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:13 am 
* NET Sports Handicapper *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am
Posts: 963
It was a solid hit, and had Rice been allowed a couple more steps I would definitely be supporting most of you in your decision that it is a bad call. The rule was stated as defenseless player - meaning he didn't have an opportunity to brace to be clobbered. With the hit he took, he could have easily been hurt due to the reaction time issue. I support the call - it had nothing to do with helmet to helmet, more it was Rice's ability to defend himself from the hit.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Unneccesary Roughness on Rice
 Post Posted: Mon Dec 10, 2012 6:16 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am
Posts: 1834
Wasn't that the play that Flynn escaped a sack and threw on the run? If I am right (and I think I am) then it's kind of hard to blame the hit on Flynn.

I also thought the call was horrible. Reminded me of Brownser's hit on Welker. As long as thete is no helmet to helmet, there shouldn't be a flag. Otherwise your ruining the game.

_________________
"cheating", Eddie D. pled to a FELONY to avoid prison and paid players under the table. Brent Jones was paid 500k the year after he stopped playing for "services" in the 90's.. Of course, there is Carmen Policy also


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.