Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:37 pm 
*BRONZE SUPPORTER*
*BRONZE SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:02 am
Posts: 755
Sorry as I am posting this from my phone but I just read that Dockett was fined six figures from the Cards and is expected to have a limited role this weekend.

https://twitter.com/mikejurecki/status/ ... 5021441024

Quote:
Mike Jurecki
‏@mikejurecki
I’m hearing that Darnell Dockett has been fined six figures from the Cardinals organization, & could have a limited role vs. Seattle.

via Adam Caplan


Last edited by AbsolutNET on Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:01 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Link added


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:39 pm 
* NET E-Knight *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 4157
FargoHawk wrote:
Sorry as I am posting this from my phone but I just read that Dockett was fined six figures from the Cards and is expected to have a limited role this weekend.

Definitely helps our oline!


I bet this stems from the spitting incident he had with Rhodes.

_________________
cboom wrote:
Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:46 pm 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10261
Location: Vancouver, WA
Guy is a major league a-hole. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving person. Damned good player though. Hope for our team's sake he doesn't even see the field.

_________________
From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:48 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm
Posts: 894
What a clown


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:49 pm 
* NET Hottie *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 2129
He spit on his own team mate?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:58 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am
Posts: 2888
Seahwkgal wrote:
He spit on his own team mate?

That was the original report, which has since been retracted.

Link to story... http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... ry-rhodes/

_________________
EastCoastHawksFan posted... "Trading for Harvin is by far the worst move John S has ever made." (March 18, 2014)

Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 34 years and counting.


Last edited by onanygivensunday on Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:00 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 7864
He's a classic douche... but man our defense truly would be 'elite' with him playing in the middle. We need a guy like Dockett.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:02 pm 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10261
Location: Vancouver, WA
theENGLISHseahawk wrote:
He's a classic douche... but man our defense truly would be 'elite' with him playing in the middle. We need a guy like Dockett.

Yep.

_________________
From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:12 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1971
Suh and Dockett

_________________
Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"

Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:18 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2483
onanygivensunday wrote:
That was the original report, which has since been retracted.


How can the Cardinals retract it, then fine Dockett? "Nothing to see here people! Dude you're fined!"

My guess is "limited role" = sits out the first couple of series, then comes on and creates havok with our O-line like he always does.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:13 pm 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 1057
Dockets himself never denied it when he had the chance and I doubt they would fine him $100,000 or more if he hadn't done something like that.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:14 pm 
* NET News Scoop *
* NET News Scoop *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm
Posts: 8926
I don't actually believe the 'limited role' part until I don't see him on the field.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:48 pm 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8883
Location: Covington, Washington
Hearing more details, it was stated that Ray Horton had told the defense to let the Jets score so the Cardinals could get one last chance to score and with a 2 pt conversion, tie the game. Dockett refused to do it and after the play had an on-field argument with Rhodes. So the penalty is for insubordination. Failing to follow the directions of the coach, which makes more sense than the original spitting on Rhodes issue being the reason the Cardinals put a 6 figure fine on him.

Quote:
Kent Somers ‏@kentsomers
Docketts fined more than 100k. Refused to folol whiz order to let jets score. Picked tiff with Rhodes. May see mor punishment sunday


"folol" probably means "follow"

_________________
Image
Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:59 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 499
He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:26 pm 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 10261
Location: Vancouver, WA
Carmon1274 wrote:
He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D.

If you're referring to the posts above, Rob (English) said "a guy LIKE Dockett" and I agreed. As in the quality of his play and the need for a really studly DT on the Hawks, not who he is as a person.
So um.......we good here dude? Oh, and please read the ENTIRE post people make.

_________________
From the white sands
To the canyon lands
To the redwood stands
To the barren lands

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:46 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 3080
Location: Anchorage, AK
If he was told by a coach to let them score and refused to do it he may actually sit. I mean seriously this was a 1pt game and that would be the only way to win the game and he cost them that opportunity....

This is a coaching staff that may get fired. I am sure they are PISSED and so they should be

On the other hand - they are a coaching staff about to get fired give it one series and then they will be concerned about their jobs and play him....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:37 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4685
Location: The 5-0
If someone sees Dockett this week, please kick him in the nuts and tell him Darnell sounds like a girl's name. For your safety, tell him it's from me. If he still wants to make a big deal out of it, click your heels together while saying RussellWilson. Do so until he leaves.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:46 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm
Posts: 499
hawksfansinceday1 wrote:
Carmon1274 wrote:
He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D.

If you're referring to the posts above, Rob (English) said "a guy LIKE Dockett" and I agreed. As in the quality of his play and the need for a really studly DT on the Hawks, not who he is as a person.
So um.......we good here dude? Oh, and please read the ENTIRE post people make.




viewtopic.php?f=4&t=57408


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:48 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1402
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
If anyone's curious, it was announced that Docket was fined 200k for the spitting incident. 200k.

_________________
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:
Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:52 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm
Posts: 1807
I would welcome Dockett on the Seahawks in a heartbeat but he isn't going anywhere. Chances are the Cardinals coaching staff and higher management are the ones who will be leaving Arizona


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:15 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 4685
Location: The 5-0
razgriz737 wrote:
If anyone's curious, it was announced that Docket was fined 200k for the spitting incident. 200k.


Excellent. It's time these big dollar imbeciles actually feel the pang of a fine. Fining a multi-millionaire $5,000 for such transgressions don't send much of a message.

I really wanted Dockett coming out of FSU. He played with an attitude but wasn't known to be a spitter at the time. But we were already set forever, having used our 1st on Marcus Tubbs earlier in the day.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:39 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 1443
I hope they don't fire Whiz before the game this week. They're setting themselves up for better draft position by "letting" teams score. Maybe this week they'll punt on first down. What a train wreck.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:00 am 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:52 pm
Posts: 249
Wow. $200,000 is the biggest NFL player fine I've ever heard for a single incident. Tsk tsk, his disagreement must have been of the vehement kind.

_________________
February 2, 2014: The day Seahawks win their second Lombardi trophy
(The first one is located back east somewhere.)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:33 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 550
wow 200k seems like a bit much even for something disgusting like spitting, totally unrelated but Patriots were fined 500k for Bountygate.
I really hope this puts a strain on their relationship and leads the team to trading to a team in the AFC.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:04 am 
* Capt'n Dom *
* Capt'n Dom *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 8836
Location: Granite Falls, WA
drdiags wrote:
Hearing more details, it was stated that Ray Horton had told the defense to let the Jets score so the Cardinals could get one last chance to score and with a 2 pt conversion, tie the game. Dockett refused to do it and after the play had an on-field argument with Rhodes. So the penalty is for insubordination. Failing to follow the directions of the coach, which makes more sense than the original spitting on Rhodes issue being the reason the Cardinals put a 6 figure fine on him.

Quote:
Kent Somers ‏@kentsomers
Docketts fined more than 100k. Refused to folol whiz order to let jets score. Picked tiff with Rhodes. May see mor punishment sunday


"folol" probably means "follow"

i dont blame him really. I would have a hard time lettng the Jets score as well. It is a matter of pride. Plus it was highly unlikely that the Cards offense was going to rally and win the game with the way they have been performing.

I am with Docket on this one.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:13 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10064
How would you like to be Ryan Lindley in the same locker room with Dockett this week?

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:18 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:46 pm
Posts: 550
Scottemojo wrote:
How would you like to be Ryan Lindley in the same locker room with Dockett this week?

lol It can't be any worse than playing behind that offensive line


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
 Post Posted: Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:21 am 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 4511
Location: UT
In other words, we should suspend him, but we don't have the stones.

_________________
“We need to be challenged, ... and we need to be under the gun to respond.” --Pete Carroll


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.