It is currently Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:20 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

.NET IndexSEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF SEATTLE FOOTBALL[ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]
Seahawks.NET AMAZON STOREFRONT

Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
Post Reply
Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:37 pm
  • Sorry as I am posting this from my phone but I just read that Dockett was fined six figures from the Cards and is expected to have a limited role this weekend.

    https://twitter.com/mikejurecki/status/ ... 5021441024

    Mike Jurecki
    ‏@mikejurecki
    I’m hearing that Darnell Dockett has been fined six figures from the Cardinals organization, & could have a limited role vs. Seattle.

    via Adam Caplan
    Last edited by AbsolutNET on Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:01 pm, edited 3 times in total.
    Reason: Link added
    User avatar
    FargoHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 912
    Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:02 am

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:39 pm
  • FargoHawk wrote:Sorry as I am posting this from my phone but I just read that Dockett was fined six figures from the Cards and is expected to have a limited role this weekend.

    Definitely helps our oline!


    I bet this stems from the spitting incident he had with Rhodes.
    cboom wrote:Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
    User avatar
    HawksFTW
    * NET E-Knight *
     
    Posts: 4157
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:46 pm
  • Guy is a major league a-hole. Couldn't have happened to a more deserving person. Damned good player though. Hope for our team's sake he doesn't even see the field.
    hawksfansinceday1
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 20876
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:48 pm
  • What a clown
    Seaswab
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 957
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:19 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:49 pm
  • He spit on his own team mate?
    User avatar
    Seahwkgal
    * NET Hottie *
     
    Posts: 4518
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:58 pm
Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:00 pm
  • He's a classic douche... but man our defense truly would be 'elite' with him playing in the middle. We need a guy like Dockett.
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 10077
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:02 pm
  • theENGLISHseahawk wrote:He's a classic douche... but man our defense truly would be 'elite' with him playing in the middle. We need a guy like Dockett.

    Yep.
    hawksfansinceday1
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 20876
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:12 pm
  • Suh and Dockett
    User avatar
    SeahawksFanForever
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2317
    Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
    Location: Irvine, California

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role
Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:18 pm
  • onanygivensunday wrote:That was the original report, which has since been retracted.


    How can the Cardinals retract it, then fine Dockett? "Nothing to see here people! Dude you're fined!"

    My guess is "limited role" = sits out the first couple of series, then comes on and creates havok with our O-line like he always does.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11790
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:13 pm
  • Dockets himself never denied it when he had the chance and I doubt they would fine him $100,000 or more if he hadn't done something like that.
    User avatar
    Shadowhawk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 1498
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:14 pm
  • I don't actually believe the 'limited role' part until I don't see him on the field.
    User avatar
    Jazzhawk
    * NET News Scoop *
     
    Posts: 9578
    Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 6:16 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:48 pm
  • Hearing more details, it was stated that Ray Horton had told the defense to let the Jets score so the Cardinals could get one last chance to score and with a 2 pt conversion, tie the game. Dockett refused to do it and after the play had an on-field argument with Rhodes. So the penalty is for insubordination. Failing to follow the directions of the coach, which makes more sense than the original spitting on Rhodes issue being the reason the Cardinals put a 6 figure fine on him.

    Kent Somers ‏@kentsomers
    Docketts fined more than 100k. Refused to folol whiz order to let jets score. Picked tiff with Rhodes. May see mor punishment sunday


    "folol" probably means "follow"
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    R.I.P Les "PithyRadish" Norton 9/13/2014
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 10688
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Kent, Washington

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:59 pm
  • He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D.
    Carmon1274
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 499
    Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:26 pm
  • Carmon1274 wrote:He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D.

    If you're referring to the posts above, Rob (English) said "a guy LIKE Dockett" and I agreed. As in the quality of his play and the need for a really studly DT on the Hawks, not who he is as a person.
    So um.......we good here dude? Oh, and please read the ENTIRE post people make.
    hawksfansinceday1
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 20876
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 4:46 pm
  • If he was told by a coach to let them score and refused to do it he may actually sit. I mean seriously this was a 1pt game and that would be the only way to win the game and he cost them that opportunity....

    This is a coaching staff that may get fired. I am sure they are PISSED and so they should be

    On the other hand - they are a coaching staff about to get fired give it one series and then they will be concerned about their jobs and play him....
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6363
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:37 pm
  • If someone sees Dockett this week, please kick him in the nuts and tell him Darnell sounds like a girl's name. For your safety, tell him it's from me. If he still wants to make a big deal out of it, click your heels together while saying RussellWilson. Do so until he leaves.
    HawkWow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6741
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
    Location: The 5-0

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:46 pm
  • hawksfansinceday1 wrote:
    Carmon1274 wrote:He is a clown, but its bad when Some Hawk fans want him playing in our D.

    If you're referring to the posts above, Rob (English) said "a guy LIKE Dockett" and I agreed. As in the quality of his play and the need for a really studly DT on the Hawks, not who he is as a person.
    So um.......we good here dude? Oh, and please read the ENTIRE post people make.




    viewtopic.php?f=4&t=57408
    Carmon1274
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 499
    Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 1:50 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:48 pm
  • If anyone's curious, it was announced that Docket was fined 200k for the spitting incident. 200k.
    Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???


    2013 Adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
    2014 Adopt-a-rookie: Kevin Norwood
    2015 Adopt-a-rookie: Kristjan Sokoli
    User avatar
    razgriz737
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2060
    Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
    Location: Spokane/Seattle

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:52 pm
  • I would welcome Dockett on the Seahawks in a heartbeat but he isn't going anywhere. Chances are the Cardinals coaching staff and higher management are the ones who will be leaving Arizona
    warden
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2002
    Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:15 pm
  • razgriz737 wrote:If anyone's curious, it was announced that Docket was fined 200k for the spitting incident. 200k.


    Excellent. It's time these big dollar imbeciles actually feel the pang of a fine. Fining a multi-millionaire $5,000 for such transgressions don't send much of a message.

    I really wanted Dockett coming out of FSU. He played with an attitude but wasn't known to be a spitter at the time. But we were already set forever, having used our 1st on Marcus Tubbs earlier in the day.
    HawkWow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6741
    Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
    Location: The 5-0

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Fri Dec 07, 2012 6:39 pm
  • I hope they don't fire Whiz before the game this week. They're setting themselves up for better draft position by "letting" teams score. Maybe this week they'll punt on first down. What a train wreck.
    rideaducati
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5729
    Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:00 am
  • Wow. $200,000 is the biggest NFL player fine I've ever heard for a single incident. Tsk tsk, his disagreement must have been of the vehement kind.
    F E E L I N G • L I K E • 2 0 1 3 • A L L • O V E R • A G A I N !
    User avatar
    Ruminator
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 757
    Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:52 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:33 am
  • wow 200k seems like a bit much even for something disgusting like spitting, totally unrelated but Patriots were fined 500k for Bountygate.
    I really hope this puts a strain on their relationship and leads the team to trading to a team in the AFC.
    User avatar
    Killa Kam
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 570
    Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:46 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:04 am
  • drdiags wrote:Hearing more details, it was stated that Ray Horton had told the defense to let the Jets score so the Cardinals could get one last chance to score and with a 2 pt conversion, tie the game. Dockett refused to do it and after the play had an on-field argument with Rhodes. So the penalty is for insubordination. Failing to follow the directions of the coach, which makes more sense than the original spitting on Rhodes issue being the reason the Cardinals put a 6 figure fine on him.

    Kent Somers ‏@kentsomers
    Docketts fined more than 100k. Refused to folol whiz order to let jets score. Picked tiff with Rhodes. May see mor punishment sunday


    "folol" probably means "follow"

    i dont blame him really. I would have a hard time lettng the Jets score as well. It is a matter of pride. Plus it was highly unlikely that the Cards offense was going to rally and win the game with the way they have been performing.

    I am with Docket on this one.
    Image
    User avatar
    Tech Worlds
    * Capt'n Dom *
     
    Posts: 11454
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
    Location: Granite Falls, WA

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:13 am
  • How would you like to be Ryan Lindley in the same locker room with Dockett this week?
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 14798
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:18 am
  • Scottemojo wrote:How would you like to be Ryan Lindley in the same locker room with Dockett this week?

    lol It can't be any worse than playing behind that offensive line
    User avatar
    Killa Kam
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 570
    Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 2:46 pm

Re: Per Twitter-Dockett to have limited role?
Sat Dec 08, 2012 10:21 am
Expand view

Post Reply

It is currently Wed Sep 20, 2017 3:20 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
.NET IndexSEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF SEATTLE FOOTBALL[ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]
© 2016 Seahawks.NET
dotNET TwentySixteen template created by Anguish

Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.