| Author |
Message |
|
SalishHawkFan
|
Post subject: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm Posts: 2683
|
Week 13 power rankings are out and Clayton has this to say: Quote: Andrew Luck might go down as the greatest rookie quarterback in NFL history. (Clayton) And adding insult to injury, they've got the crap Colts ranked ahead of the Hawks.
_________________ Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jkitsune
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm Posts: 1503
|
|
Colts are 8-4. Can't say that's not a good reason to rank them ahead of the Hawks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jamsomatic
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:22 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:03 pm Posts: 192 Location: Minneapolis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm Posts: 2716
|
|
Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 691 Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
jkitsune wrote: Colts are 8-4. Can't say that's not a good reason to rank them ahead of the Hawks. I haven't looked at their schedule, but someone said they've mostly beaten crappy teams. But, then again, we've mostly lost to crappy teams, haha.
_________________ "It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
KitsapHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:24 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm Posts: 466 Location: Behind you
|
therealjohncarlson wrote: Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has. This is false. This team was not the worst in football last year. This was a team that intentionally lost games. Sticking painter throughout the year was an obvious sign that they had no intention of going anywhere that year.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:36 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm Posts: 2716
|
KitsapHawk wrote: therealjohncarlson wrote: Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has. This is false. This team was not the worst in football last year. This was a team that intentionally lost games. Sticking painter throughout the year was an obvious sign that they had no intention of going anywhere that year. OK... splitting hairs. They were still really bad.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:36 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm Posts: 1434
|
KitsapHawk wrote: therealjohncarlson wrote: Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has. This is false. This team was not the worst in football last year. This was a team that intentionally lost games. Sticking painter throughout the year was an obvious sign that they had no intention of going anywhere that year. Thank you! I get so sick of hearing about how great Luck is because of them being 8-4 this season and so horrible last season while those same people blatantly overlook the fact that the Colts threw their season away so they could draft Luck. They were not even the worst team last season.
_________________ I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
razgriz737 wrote: jkitsune wrote: Colts are 8-4. Can't say that's not a good reason to rank them ahead of the Hawks. I haven't looked at their schedule, but someone said they've mostly beaten crappy teams. But, then again, we've mostly lost to crappy teams, haha. lol great point my friend. Only on the road though, at least. And all games have been close.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:44 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am Posts: 5714 Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
For the life of me, I can't understand how people get excited about rankings.
Truly....who cares??
The only "ranking" that matters is who grabs the Lombardi and finishes #1. The rest is .... well ...
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SilNWest
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:45 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:51 am Posts: 608 Location: Auburn, Wa
|
|
The greatest rookie quarterback of all time? He's not even the greatest of this season!
He hasn't distanced himself from Russell Wilson or RG3 at all, and if I had to crown someone as the greatest rookie ever it would probably be RG3. Followed by Wilson, then Manning. Luck would definitely be on there... but not at the top.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am Posts: 6185 Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
CurryStopstheRuns wrote: KitsapHawk wrote: therealjohncarlson wrote: Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has. This is false. This team was not the worst in football last year. This was a team that intentionally lost games. Sticking painter throughout the year was an obvious sign that they had no intention of going anywhere that year. Thank you! I get so sick of hearing about how great Luck is because of them being 8-4 this season and so horrible last season while those same people blatantly overlook the fact that the Colts threw their season away so they could draft Luck. They were not even the worst team last season. Yup, the Colts coaches instructed their players to throw the season so they could get Luck. Those coaches are probably really enjoying coaching him. What? They were all fired? Oh, then it must have been the Colts' front office that came up with the plan and forced the coaches and players to go along with it. Good job, front office. What? They were all fired, too? Oh, then it must have been the Colts' ownership that convinced the front office, the coaching staff, and the players to all go against everything they work for each season and throw games so they could get Luck for the team and kiss their jobs goodbye as a result. Yeah, that makes total sense. 
_________________ Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SalishHawkFan
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm Posts: 2683
|
FlyingGreg wrote: For the life of me, I can't understand how people get excited about rankings.
Truly....who cares??
The only "ranking" that matters is who grabs the Lombardi and finishes #1. The rest is .... well ... I'm just sick of the overblown Luck hyperbole. When even Clayton is falling for the hype, that gets annoying.
_________________ Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:54 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
|
Maybe it was kinda like what Whiz is doing with Lindley right now? Cause Lindley sucks, and Painter sucked. connection????
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 691 Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
SilNWest wrote: The greatest rookie quarterback of all time? He's not even the greatest of this season!
He hasn't distanced himself from Russell Wilson or RG3 at all, and if I had to crown someone as the greatest rookie ever it would probably be RG3. Followed by Wilson, then Manning. Luck would definitely be on there... but not at the top. Agree with you there. I'll pretend RW is out of the running so my homerism doesn't factor into it, and I would rank RGIII ahead of Luck with no hesitation. I understand that DangeRuss will most likely never be a "superstar" or whatever because he plays for Seattle, and I think this rookie class outstanding, but the over-glorification of Luck and RGIII just gets old. Whatever. I'm just glad instead of "Wilson vs. Flynn" we can now have "Wilson vs. other really good rookies".
_________________ "It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
Last edited by razgriz737 on Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
taz291819
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:00 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:16 pm Posts: 3247 Location: Huntsville, Al
|
volsunghawk wrote: Yup, the Colts coaches instructed their players to throw the season so they could get Luck. Those coaches are probably really enjoying coaching him. What? They were all fired? Oh, then it must have been the Colts' front office that came up with the plan and forced the coaches and players to go along with it. Good job, front office. What? They were all fired, too? Oh, then it must have been the Colts' ownership that convinced the front office, the coaching staff, and the players to all go against everything they work for each season and throw games so they could get Luck for the team and kiss their jobs goodbye as a result. Yeah, that makes total sense.  Hey, quit bringing facts into this, it's uncalled for.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CaptainSkybeard
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:08 pm Posts: 530
|
|
Also too, also, also too.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am Posts: 1187 Location: Victoria BC
|
jkitsune wrote: Colts are 8-4. Can't say that's not a good reason to rank them ahead of the Hawks. welllllll gp look at their record and who they beat and where. I think thy have only played 2 maybe 3 games with winning teams
_________________ Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hawks46
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:24 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm Posts: 1702
|
|
And we've lost 3 games to teams with losing records, as stated above. What's the point ?
Oh by the way, we're also 0-3 in the division. Maybe that's a reason to rank us down a bit too.
That's the stat that really pisses me off. 0-fer in division.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really? Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:37 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am Posts: 6606 Location: Covington, Washington
|
|
Not sure if the OP is aware that Clayton may be located in the Seattle/Tacoma area but he originally cut his teeth writing about/following the Pittsburgh Steelers. He will tell you that he was a Steelers fan when he cheered for a team. He is just like Sando. They live in the region but hold no allegiance to the Seahawks.
He hasn't been a beat writer for the Seahawks in decades. If Claire Farnsworth or Tony Ventrella are saying the same thing, then one might feel betrayed.
Clayton isn't in the bag for the Seahawks. He just has a local show on the weekend so JB and Irish Minky can talk about god knows what.
_________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians." NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: AVL, bestfightstory, brettb3, CamanoIslandJQ, Cartire, DaveG, dbmack, EastCoastHawksFan, Google [Bot], grizbob, HawkGA, hidn, HunnyBadger, jammerhawk, JimZorn10, kinesmajor, mrblitz, NorthwestSportsFan, purpleworld, rainger, RynoHawk, scutterhawk, Seanhawk, stev32e, Stone Cold, streets24, Terpdragon, thecycle, Veilside, WestcoastSteve, Yoonhawk and 129 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |