Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:18 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 2699
Week 13 power rankings are out and Clayton has this to say:

Quote:
Andrew Luck might go down as the greatest rookie quarterback in NFL history. (Clayton)


And adding insult to injury, they've got the crap Colts ranked ahead of the Hawks.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:21 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm
Posts: 1514
Colts are 8-4. Can't say that's not a good reason to rank them ahead of the Hawks.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:22 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:03 pm
Posts: 192
Location: Minneapolis
It's okay. It really is.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 2743
Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:23 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
jkitsune wrote:
Colts are 8-4. Can't say that's not a good reason to rank them ahead of the Hawks.

I haven't looked at their schedule, but someone said they've mostly beaten crappy teams.

But, then again, we've mostly lost to crappy teams, haha.

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:24 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm
Posts: 486
Location: Behind you
therealjohncarlson wrote:
Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has.


This is false. This team was not the worst in football last year. This was a team that intentionally lost games. Sticking painter throughout the year was an obvious sign that they had no intention of going anywhere that year.

_________________
Image
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:36 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 2743
KitsapHawk wrote:
therealjohncarlson wrote:
Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has.


This is false. This team was not the worst in football last year. This was a team that intentionally lost games. Sticking painter throughout the year was an obvious sign that they had no intention of going anywhere that year.


OK... splitting hairs. They were still really bad.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:36 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1443
KitsapHawk wrote:
therealjohncarlson wrote:
Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has.


This is false. This team was not the worst in football last year. This was a team that intentionally lost games. Sticking painter throughout the year was an obvious sign that they had no intention of going anywhere that year.



Thank you! I get so sick of hearing about how great Luck is because of them being 8-4 this season and so horrible last season while those same people blatantly overlook the fact that the Colts threw their season away so they could draft Luck. They were not even the worst team last season.

_________________
I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:37 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
razgriz737 wrote:
jkitsune wrote:
Colts are 8-4. Can't say that's not a good reason to rank them ahead of the Hawks.

I haven't looked at their schedule, but someone said they've mostly beaten crappy teams.

But, then again, we've mostly lost to crappy teams, haha.


lol great point my friend. Only on the road though, at least. And all games have been close.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:44 pm 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5866
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
For the life of me, I can't understand how people get excited about rankings.

Truly....who cares??

The only "ranking" that matters is who grabs the Lombardi and finishes #1. The rest is .... well ...

_________________
@SeahawkGreg

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:45 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:51 am
Posts: 612
Location: Auburn, Wa
The greatest rookie quarterback of all time? He's not even the greatest of this season!

He hasn't distanced himself from Russell Wilson or RG3 at all, and if I had to crown someone as the greatest rookie ever it would probably be RG3. Followed by Wilson, then Manning. Luck would definitely be on there... but not at the top.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:48 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6237
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
CurryStopstheRuns wrote:
KitsapHawk wrote:
therealjohncarlson wrote:
Colts were the worst team in football last year and Luck has positioned them to get a playoff spot... Its not really unheard of to say that. The man has done a unbelievable job with the limited supplies he has.


This is false. This team was not the worst in football last year. This was a team that intentionally lost games. Sticking painter throughout the year was an obvious sign that they had no intention of going anywhere that year.



Thank you! I get so sick of hearing about how great Luck is because of them being 8-4 this season and so horrible last season while those same people blatantly overlook the fact that the Colts threw their season away so they could draft Luck. They were not even the worst team last season.


Yup, the Colts coaches instructed their players to throw the season so they could get Luck. Those coaches are probably really enjoying coaching him.

What? They were all fired?

Oh, then it must have been the Colts' front office that came up with the plan and forced the coaches and players to go along with it. Good job, front office.

What? They were all fired, too?

Oh, then it must have been the Colts' ownership that convinced the front office, the coaching staff, and the players to all go against everything they work for each season and throw games so they could get Luck for the team and kiss their jobs goodbye as a result.

Yeah, that makes total sense. :roll:

_________________
Image

Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:50 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 2699
FlyingGreg wrote:
For the life of me, I can't understand how people get excited about rankings.

Truly....who cares??

The only "ranking" that matters is who grabs the Lombardi and finishes #1. The rest is .... well ...

I'm just sick of the overblown Luck hyperbole. When even Clayton is falling for the hype, that gets annoying.

_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:54 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
Maybe it was kinda like what Whiz is doing with Lindley right now? Cause Lindley sucks, and Painter sucked. connection????


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:56 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
SilNWest wrote:
The greatest rookie quarterback of all time? He's not even the greatest of this season!

He hasn't distanced himself from Russell Wilson or RG3 at all, and if I had to crown someone as the greatest rookie ever it would probably be RG3. Followed by Wilson, then Manning. Luck would definitely be on there... but not at the top.

Agree with you there. I'll pretend RW is out of the running so my homerism doesn't factor into it, and I would rank RGIII ahead of Luck with no hesitation.

I understand that DangeRuss will most likely never be a "superstar" or whatever because he plays for Seattle, and I think this rookie class outstanding, but the over-glorification of Luck and RGIII just gets old.

Whatever. I'm just glad instead of "Wilson vs. Flynn" we can now have "Wilson vs. other really good rookies".

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Last edited by razgriz737 on Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:00 pm 
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
*SILVER SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:16 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Huntsville, Al
volsunghawk wrote:
Yup, the Colts coaches instructed their players to throw the season so they could get Luck. Those coaches are probably really enjoying coaching him.

What? They were all fired?

Oh, then it must have been the Colts' front office that came up with the plan and forced the coaches and players to go along with it. Good job, front office.

What? They were all fired, too?

Oh, then it must have been the Colts' ownership that convinced the front office, the coaching staff, and the players to all go against everything they work for each season and throw games so they could get Luck for the team and kiss their jobs goodbye as a result.

Yeah, that makes total sense. :roll:


Hey, quit bringing facts into this, it's uncalled for.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:07 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:08 pm
Posts: 530
Also too, also, also too.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:17 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1189
Location: Victoria BC
jkitsune wrote:
Colts are 8-4. Can't say that's not a good reason to rank them ahead of the Hawks.

welllllll gp look at their record and who they beat and where. I think thy have only played 2 maybe 3 games with winning teams

_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:24 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 1753
And we've lost 3 games to teams with losing records, as stated above. What's the point ?

Oh by the way, we're also 0-3 in the division. Maybe that's a reason to rank us down a bit too.

That's the stat that really pisses me off. 0-fer in division.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Et tu Clayton? Really?
 Post Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:37 pm 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 6727
Location: Covington, Washington
Not sure if the OP is aware that Clayton may be located in the Seattle/Tacoma area but he originally cut his teeth writing about/following the Pittsburgh Steelers. He will tell you that he was a Steelers fan when he cheered for a team. He is just like Sando. They live in the region but hold no allegiance to the Seahawks.

He hasn't been a beat writer for the Seahawks in decades. If Claire Farnsworth or Tony Ventrella are saying the same thing, then one might feel betrayed.

Clayton isn't in the bag for the Seahawks. He just has a local show on the weekend so JB and Irish Minky can talk about god knows what.

_________________
Image
"The Seahawks are now known league wide as the team sooooooo badass and smashmouth and hard hitting that they couldn't even go thru their own practices without laying smack down on fools." - JSeahawks


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.