chris98251 wrote:So you thought it was general discussion yet you commented on the specific details of waht we were talking about.
I guess I can't believe what I read.
What are you even talking about?
You wrote: "Running the option read was Wilsons idea and he lobbied for it." I read that as it being his idea initially and said it was Carroll's idea. You were referring to the Chicago game specifically and not in general. It's not hard to work out why I read it as I did. And it's hardly worth arguing the toss over.
But don't worry, Pehawk will be here in a moment to tell you your clogging the discussion up.