 |
| Author |
Message |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
jammerhawk wrote: hawker84 wrote: call me old fashioned or whatever, but i hate that rule, where only the ball has to cross the plane to be considered a touchdown.. i played in an era where not only the ball had to cross the plane, you had to actually maintain possesion of it... i can't count how many td's have been scored in the last few years where the ball has been fumbled emmediately after the ball crossed the goal.
before you attack, don't get me wrong, i'm very grateful for the Rice and G Tate TD's yesterday, but i just think this game is getting too damn soft, can't touch qb's any more even when there outside the pocket, can't touch recievers any more, a slight hands to the face is a huge penalty... just go ahead and purchase the flags, because that's the direction this league is heading to, flag football..
guess i'm just longing for the old days, when football was about blood and guts, and players like Tatum and LT were to be feared when you cross the middle or run the ball.. guess i'm just getting old and stuck in my ways.. your opinions? Wow, so what you are saying is that any vulnerable player is free game to blow up so he can be separated from the ball and if that happens there is no TD even if the ball crosses the plane of the goal line clearly in the possession of that player. This is an interesting approach but contrary to the present rules and an approach which would lead to more than one serious injury. The game can still have physicality but there is no need to encourage a situation where players can get hurt. I disagree with you. huh? not saying that at all
_________________ On to the Next Episode
Last edited by hawker84 on Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:20 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
where anywhere in my post or post's did i say i want to see more vunerable players getting hit? reaching.
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:26 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3526
|
hawker84 wrote: all scoring plays are reviewed, again i know it's a shocker but i do know and understand most of the rules... and you're trying to tell me the whistle was blown before that ball came out... beg to differ.. apples and oranges..
All scoring views are up for review, yes. There is a two step process though. They are either buzzed down to the field to be looked at, or are confirmed. This specific instance Mike Carey actually went under the hood to examine the play, which doesn't happen automatically. And no, I am not saying the play was whistled dead. I am saying the play is dead as soon as the ball crosses the end line in the possession of a player. Similar to how a play is dead as soon as the whistle blows on the field. You are asking for the plays in the endzone to be consistent with what is called on the field, and I am showing you exactly that. Just because you don't understand it, doesn't mean it isn't true.
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:35 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm Posts: 1390
|
|
1) In the field of play the Rice catch is complete and he is without a doubt DOWN. He lands on the ground with the ball in possession (which is why it was deemed a TD) then gets hit and the ball comes loose when he is on the ground. That is down by contact at the moment of impact. No fumble would be called if this was in the field of play, endzone, in his backyard, Madden NFL or wherever this was played. The only place that is a fumble is on the Chicago Bears message board........
2) When you break the plane the play has to end. The whole goal of the game of football is to get more points than the opponent. This is accomplished by getting the ball across the plane into the opponents endzone or kicking a FG. If you break the plane the play is dead the second it happens. Otherwise what he lands everyone can pile up on him and take a few licks and then we see if the ball is still in possession.
What about a play in the middle of the field. The player reaches out the ball is at the 40 yard line, the body is at the 38 yard line, knee is down, he is touched, the ball comes loose. Where do you want the ball placed? The rules say it is on the 40 yard line and the offense keeps the possession.
Should this also be a turnover then? Should the ball be back on the 38 yard line? if you place it on the 40 yard line then why would a touchdown be different?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am Posts: 1185 Location: Victoria BC
|
hawker84 wrote: call me old fashioned or whatever, but i hate that rule, where only the ball has to cross the plane to be considered a touchdown.. i played in an era where not only the ball had to cross the plane, you had to actually maintain possesion of it... i can't count how many td's have been scored in the last few years where the ball has been fumbled emmediately after the ball crossed the goal.
before you attack, don't get me wrong, i'm very grateful for the Rice and G Tate TD's yesterday, but i just think this game is getting too damn soft, can't touch qb's any more even when there outside the pocket, can't touch recievers any more, a slight hands to the face is a huge penalty... just go ahead and purchase the flags, because that's the direction this league is heading to, flag football..
guess i'm just longing for the old days, when football was about blood and guts, and players like Tatum and LT were to be feared when you cross the middle or run the ball.. guess i'm just getting old and stuck in my ways.. your opinions? I am another old codger I hear ya I feel your pain.
_________________ Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:37 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3526
|
mikeak wrote: What about a play in the middle of the field. The player reaches out the ball is at the 40 yard line, the body is at the 38 yard line, knee is down, he is touched, the ball comes loose. Where do you want the ball placed? The rules say it is on the 40 yard line and the offense keeps the possession.
Should this also be a turnover then? Should the ball be back on the 38 yard line? if you place it on the 40 yard line then why would a touchdown be different? Exactly. These type of plays show the uniformity I was trying to express. It is the same call regardless of where it is at on the field, granted that the officials call it correctly.
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
it's not the same,nor is it true... the rule states (correct me if i'm wrong) that the play is dead as soon as the ball crosses the plane.. a play on the field is dead after the whistle blows.. therefore it is nothing alike. so what am i not understanding? plays on the field and plays in the endzone are no where near consistent as to how to they are called dead..
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:45 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm Posts: 1390
|
I had a great freaking post but hit post reply instead of submit - AAARRGGGH In the field of play the play is not dead based on a whistle. It is dead based on the player being down by contact either on the tackle causing him to go down or touched on the ground. The play in the endzone is dead based upon accomplishing the goal of brining the ball across the field into the endzone. There is nothing else to accomplish. my original post was much better so give me credit for that instead 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
first of all those are two different plays arer entirely different
.. but to answer, i've always felt the ball should be placed where the ball carriers body first touches the ground, be it a knee, hand or whatever... if the ball comes loose, during the stretching it out process, then i feel it should be ruled a fumble..because he is still making a football move.. i know the ground can't cause a fumble , yet another rule i don't like..
the rice play .. he was hit and the ball was dislodged at the same time he was contacting the ground, had that play been on the 20 yrd line, you cannot tell me that play wouldn't have been reviewed and possibly called a fumble...
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:50 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3526
|
hawker84 wrote: it's not the same,nor is it true... the rule states (correct me if i'm wrong) that the play is dead as soon as the ball crosses the plane.. a play on the field is dead after the whistle blows.. therefore it is nothing alike. so what am i not understanding? plays on the field and plays in the endzone are no where near consistent as to how to they are called dead.. It mind boggling that you don't see this, maybe you are just being obtuse on purpose. Each play has a designated end, where upon that point the play is dead, and nothing after that matters. In the field of play, that is the whistle being blown (either due to a player being down or forward progress stopped), a player stepping out of bounds, or the ball crossing the end line in the possession of a player. They all essentially achieve the same thing, play over. You are calling for the continuation of a play which has been deemed dead, just because you don't like the finality of it. Would you rather go back to the rules pre-1889 where you had to physically place the ball on the ground in the endzone? At what point would a play be over in the endzone then? This is the problem, you are taking something which is arbitrary in nature (the endline) but universally agreed upon, and wanting to replace it with something much more complex in applying in action, but also arbitrary. My vote is for the universally agreed upon rules, which everyone and their mother can see with their own two eyes (unless your name is Bill Leavy). With that said, I am out of this discussion. If you don't get it by now, you never will.
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:51 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
mikeak wrote: I had a great freaking post but hit post reply instead of submit - AAARRGGGH In the field of play the play is not dead based on a whistle. It is dead based on the player being down by contact either on the tackle causing him to go down or touched on the ground. The play in the endzone is dead based upon accomplishing the goal of brining the ball across the field into the endzone. There is nothing else to accomplish. my original post was much better so give me credit for that instead  credit given... but to retort.. how many plays have you seen when a player appears to be down by contact , but gets up and continues the play because the whistle wasn't blown? happens quite a bit.. and again you guys keep quoting the whole breaking the plane rule to me, like i don't get it.. i do... i just don't like it..
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:54 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16444 Location: SoCal
|
|
Aros breaks a plane almost every week.
I gest, but regarding this play.....if it were a mere 3 yards before the goal line and the player was fumbling or didnt have control it would be ruled as such. Therefore the break the plane rule is bullshit in my opinion if they are fumbling without having both feet down and inbounds crossing the friggin goal line.
Last edited by Largent80 on Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hawkaholic
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:56 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 9:17 am Posts: 1924
|
|
Start watching rubgy = problem fixed
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:57 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
it's mind boggling to me that you don't get that i do get it, i just don't agree with it... it's an opinion guy, nothing more nothing less.... my opinion about the rule.. whether i'm right or wrong , it's my opinion... i could care less if it's been around since the roman games, i don't like it, among other rules... why is it so hard for you to understand that?
_________________ On to the Next Episode
Last edited by hawker84 on Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:01 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
Largent80 wrote: Aros breaks a plane almost every week.
I gest, but regarding this play.....if it were a mere 3 yards before the goal line and the player was fumbling or didnt have control it would be ruled as such. Therefore the break the plane rule is bullshit in my opinion if they are fumbling without having both feet down and inbounds crossing the friggin goal line. give you an example, there was a DB a couple weeks back, had a pick six took it to the house, but tossed the ball away in celebration just before he crossed the goal line, it was ruled a TD, wasn't even reviewed when he clearly didn't cross the plane.. another one, less we forget NY Jets and testeverde's bullsh*t TD, his helmet crossed the plane, not even the ball , ruled a TD, no playoffs for hawks... that was the play where i started quetioning this rule.
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
AbsolutNET
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:04 pm |
|
| * NET X's & O's Guru * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am Posts: 6789 Location: PNW
|
hawker84 wrote: Largent80 wrote: Aros breaks a plane almost every week.
I gest, but regarding this play.....if it were a mere 3 yards before the goal line and the player was fumbling or didnt have control it would be ruled as such. Therefore the break the plane rule is bullshit in my opinion if they are fumbling without having both feet down and inbounds crossing the friggin goal line. give you an example, there was a DB a couple weeks back, had a pick six took it to the house, but tossed the ball away in celebration just before he crossed the goal line, it was ruled a TD, wasn't even reviewed when he clearly didn't cross the plane.. another one, less we forget NY Jets and testeverde's bullsh*t TD, his helmet crossed the plane, not even the ball , ruled a TD, no playoffs for hawks... that was the play where i started quetioning this rule. Ummmm.....how are those examples of the rule? Those are examples of refs botching calls.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:05 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3526
|
hawker84 wrote: Largent80 wrote: Aros breaks a plane almost every week.
I gest, but regarding this play.....if it were a mere 3 yards before the goal line and the player was fumbling or didnt have control it would be ruled as such. Therefore the break the plane rule is bullshit in my opinion if they are fumbling without having both feet down and inbounds crossing the friggin goal line. give you an example, there was a DB a couple weeks back, had a pick six took it to the house, but tossed the ball away in celebration just before he crossed the goal line, it was ruled a TD, wasn't even reviewed when he clearly didn't cross the plane.. another one, less we forget NY Jets and testeverde's bullsh*t TD, his helmet crossed the plane, not even the ball , ruled a TD, no playoffs for hawks... that was the play where i started quetioning this rule. Oh man, I couldn't resist. Neither one of these plays brings into question the play being dead once the ball crossed the end line. But, considering the rest of posts, it doesn't surprise me that you don't get that either.  Pretty much every example you have posted here, or complained about, is the result of human error (i.e. the refs) which if you want to start bitching about the refs, I will whole heartedly back you up on that one.
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:07 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16444 Location: SoCal
|
|
I am making a white russian, anyone want one?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:10 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
AbsolutNET wrote: hawker84 wrote: Largent80 wrote: Aros breaks a plane almost every week.
I gest, but regarding this play.....if it were a mere 3 yards before the goal line and the player was fumbling or didnt have control it would be ruled as such. Therefore the break the plane rule is bullshit in my opinion if they are fumbling without having both feet down and inbounds crossing the friggin goal line. give you an example, there was a DB a couple weeks back, had a pick six took it to the house, but tossed the ball away in celebration just before he crossed the goal line, it was ruled a TD, wasn't even reviewed when he clearly didn't cross the plane.. another one, less we forget NY Jets and testeverde's bullsh*t TD, his helmet crossed the plane, not even the ball , ruled a TD, no playoffs for hawks... that was the play where i started quetioning this rule. Ummmm.....how are those examples of the rule? Those are examples of refs botching calls. ya that's true, damanit, thought it sounded good at the time.. but that is when started disliking the crossing the plane thing,
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: breaking the plane Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2090 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
tell you what FTW, you're right i'm wrong, i gracefully accept defeat to a clearly far more educated football fan than I.. congrats on your victory.. maybe i should start watching rugby.. might as well i don't know their rules either..
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 400WattHPSHawk, Animalman, Aros, ArrogantShawn, BamaHawk, Blitzer88, Cinque52, Cirmman, dbmack, deucediggity, emurri, Erebus, FortWorthSeahawk, Google [Bot], H4WKSF4N, HawkRiderFan, hawksfanohio, hidn, jake_ireland, Landhawk1, McGruff, Natethegreat, NorthwestSportsFan, nsport, Onyx, openureyez, pocketprotector, quadsas, renofox, rightbench, RockHawk, RynoHawk, seahawkfreak, Seahawkwalt1967, SmokeyHawk, Spleenhawk2.0, TDBinOLY, TheHawkDoc, therealjohncarlson, Tical21, Timberhawk, TylerDurden, VancitySeahawk and 163 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|