| Author |
Message |
|
canzag
|
Post subject: Secondary playing softer less press coverage  Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:20 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:53 am
Posts: 491
|
|
Perhaps getting ready for the suspension?I did not notice as much press coverage this week.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
652cHAWK
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:37 am |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:20 am
Posts: 762
|
I don't know about less press coverage equaling softer play from the secondary. More like negative press coverage overall. I'm already hearing stuff from people like Chris Rose 'NFL Network' Gameday Final host, after that Marshall reception with 20 seconds left(about Sherman); "probably didn't have his Adderall..."  _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
EastCoastHawksFan
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:42 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:15 pm
Posts: 569
|
|
Sherman wasn't lined up on Marshall, which i think he should have been every play , especially that play.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1284
|
652cHAWK wrote: I don't know about less press coverage equaling softer play from the secondary. More like negative press coverage overall. I'm already hearing stuff from people like Chris Rose 'NFL Network' Gameday Final host, after that Marshall reception with 20 seconds left(about Sherman); "probably didn't have his Adderall..." Pretty sure that was Heath Evans' voice. Dude is still pissed about Beastquake.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 660
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
Basis4day wrote: 652cHAWK wrote: I don't know about less press coverage equaling softer play from the secondary. More like negative press coverage overall. I'm already hearing stuff from people like Chris Rose 'NFL Network' Gameday Final host, after that Marshall reception with 20 seconds left(about Sherman); "probably didn't have his Adderall..." Pretty sure that was Heath Evans' voice. Dude is still pissed about Beastquake. No kidding. I've honestly never heard that guy say anything positive about the Hawks. Seems bitter or something.
_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahwkgal
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:15 pm |
|
| * NET Hottie * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 1303
|
|
Can they appeal until next season? If we lose BB and Sherm now, we don't have a chance for any playoff run. This sucks. I think the timing and the fact that it is BOTH of our corners seems suspicious(like they were set up).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:20 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1284
|
Seahwkgal wrote: Can they appeal until next season? If we lose BB and Sherm now, we don't have a chance for any playoff run. This sucks. I think the timing and the fact that it is BOTH of our corners seems suspicious(like they were set up). Depending about the context of their appeal, yes it can. The Star Caps thing went on for a WHILE. But it needs to be said again. We know very little about what actually happened with them or what is their basis for appeal. They are allowed to keep playing until their appeal is resolved.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 2061
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
Seahwkgal wrote: Can they appeal until next season? If we lose BB and Sherm now, we don't have a chance for any playoff run. This sucks. I think the timing and the fact that it is BOTH of our corners seems suspicious(like they were set up). to say we don't have a chance is a bit strong.. starters get hurt all the time.. that's what back ups are for
_________________
On to the Next Episode
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pugs1
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:37 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:41 pm
Posts: 444
Location: Jackson, Mississippi
|
|
Since Harbaugh bitched to the NFL about Browner and Sherman they have gotten a defensive holding call on the first defensive series in every game.
_________________
I would rather have an army of Dogs led by a Pug than an army of Pugs led by a Dog. ~Napoleon
|
|
| |
|
|
|
zayden185
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:04 am
Posts: 588
|
Basis4day wrote: 652cHAWK wrote: I don't know about less press coverage equaling softer play from the secondary. More like negative press coverage overall. I'm already hearing stuff from people like Chris Rose 'NFL Network' Gameday Final host, after that Marshall reception with 20 seconds left(about Sherman); "probably didn't have his Adderall..." Pretty sure that was Heath Evans' voice. Dude is still pissed about Beastquake. that guy is a douche! they have a segment for him called "DO YOUR JOB" he had some guard not making a block or something...i wanted to ask NFL Network for my 30 seconds back. and speaking of NFL Network, whats up with the lighting on that set? The Dude with the Big Ears and the girl that comes on...she is hideous under a certain light! Who does the hiring for that job...fire that mofo
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:51 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1192
|
|
Its true, we dont know what will happen if we lose both these guys. A little over a year ago, Sherman was our #4 CB, and not much further than that, Browner wasn't even in the league. No reason we can't work that magic again.
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 660
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
ensett wrote: Its true, we dont know what will happen if we lose both these guys. A little over a year ago, Sherman was our #4 CB, and not much further than that, Browner wasn't even in the league. No reason we can't work that magic again. Yeah. Obviously the talent evaluation was spot on, so unless they were just really lucky with getting 2 great DB's, I'm honestly not that worried.
_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
Last edited by razgriz737 on Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:55 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am
Posts: 3523
|
652cHAWK wrote: I don't know about less press coverage equaling softer play from the secondary. More like negative press coverage overall. I'm already hearing stuff from people like Chris Rose 'NFL Network' Gameday Final host, after that Marshall reception with 20 seconds left(about Sherman); "probably didn't have his Adderall..." I think he is talking about actual press coverage on the field (ie man coverage, bump and run, near the line of scrimmage) instead of media coverage. _________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
scutterhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 2071
|
Basis4day wrote: 652cHAWK wrote: I don't know about less press coverage equaling softer play from the secondary. More like negative press coverage overall. I'm already hearing stuff from people like Chris Rose 'NFL Network' Gameday Final host, after that Marshall reception with 20 seconds left(about Sherman); "probably didn't have his Adderall..." Pretty sure that was Heath Evans' voice. Dude is still pissed about Beastquake. In retrospect?, we can be thankful that Heath Evans got dumped, the guy is a dweeb turd 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
PlinytheCenter
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 2147
Location: In Bruges
|
razgriz737 wrote: ensett wrote: Its true, we dont know what will happen if we lose both these guys. A little over a year ago, Sherman was our #4 CB, and not much further than that, Browner wasn't even in the league. No reason we can't work that magic again. Yeah. Obviously the talent evaluation was spot on, so unless they were just really lucky with getting 2 great DB's, I'm honestly not that worried. The best way to mitigate the problem of backup CB's is to get consistent pressure from the D line. That hasn't been happening with any regularity lately and THAT is what is worrisome.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:14 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 660
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
PlinytheCenter wrote: razgriz737 wrote: ensett wrote: Its true, we dont know what will happen if we lose both these guys. A little over a year ago, Sherman was our #4 CB, and not much further than that, Browner wasn't even in the league. No reason we can't work that magic again. Yeah. Obviously the talent evaluation was spot on, so unless they were just really lucky with getting 2 great DB's, I'm honestly not that worried. The best way to mitigate the problem of backup CB's is to get consistent pressure from the D line. That hasn't been happening with any regularity lately and THAT is what is worrisome. I definitely agree with that. Our pass rush has certainly been MIA these past few weeks...
_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
Last edited by razgriz737 on Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
652cHAWK
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:14 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:20 am
Posts: 762
|
HawksFTW wrote: 652cHAWK wrote: I don't know about less press coverage equaling softer play from the secondary. More like negative press coverage overall. I'm already hearing stuff from people like Chris Rose 'NFL Network' Gameday Final host, after that Marshall reception with 20 seconds left(about Sherman); "probably didn't have his Adderall..." Double Yes, X & Os press coverage. Plus, it was Heath Evans on that Adderall comment; i.e. negative media coverage. _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksSoc
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 2:00 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 154
Location: Ireland!
|
Basis4day wrote: 652cHAWK wrote: I don't know about less press coverage equaling softer play from the secondary. More like negative press coverage overall. I'm already hearing stuff from people like Chris Rose 'NFL Network' Gameday Final host, after that Marshall reception with 20 seconds left(about Sherman); "probably didn't have his Adderall..." Pretty sure that was Heath Evans' voice. Dude is still pissed about Beastquake. Does anyone else find it ironic that Heath said that and he himself during his NFL days had a prescription for adderall too? Seems a little hypocritical... http://www.weei.com/sports/boston/this- ... uth-idiots
_________________
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Mark Twain.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
twelfman
|
Post subject: Re: Secondary playing softer less press coverage Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:17 pm |
|
| *BRONZE SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 4:06 pm
Posts: 499
|
|
We play much better it seems when we press the recievers hard right on the line but were they worried these guys were gonna juke em out of their shoes or somethin cuz we need to be able to do that to everyone
It felt like prevent all over again at times
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 19 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thMode, A World Peace, Alexa [Bot], arghawkfan, ArmyHawk, Attyla the Hawk, BAllenHawk, BirdsCommaAngry, BlueThunder, cacksman, CFraychineaud, docj78, drdiags, dunceface, FlyingGreg, Google [Bot], grizbob, Hachtung, Hasselbeck, Hawkfan77, Hawkfish, KK84, Mandu, McG, McGruff, mistaowen, mrdaija, Natethegreat, NorthwestSportsFan, PrepntheSep, QuickLightning, RolandDeschain, RussellMania, ScottishSeahawk, Shock2k, soxhawk, SuperHawks, SwissSeahawk, tacomahawk, tooshort, TwilightError, usc17hawk, VancitySeahawk, warden, yeash28 and 163 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
