 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:36 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm Posts: 2664
|
Per Schefter Quote: RT @AdamSchefter: Appeal of Seahawks CB Richard Sherman’s four-game suspension is scheduled for Dec. 14, which means he will play Sunday against Arizona. Also regarding Browner: Quote: RT @AdamSchefter: Still no appeal date set for Seahawks CB Brandon Browner.
_________________ Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:39 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am Posts: 6897 Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
Good. We will be able to at least slightly stagger the suspensions.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:40 pm |
|
| * NET Injury Guru * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am Posts: 1174 Location: Poulsbo, WA
|
|
I actually think that Sherman playing this weekend turns out to be very bad news for the Hawks, unless of course the ruling is overturned. I would much rather have him miss the Arizona game than the first playoff game. Actually with it being the 14th (which is a Friday) it probably means he'll be available for the Bills games as well unless they pretty much instantaneously make a ruling and would start his suspension in less than 48 hours after the appeal is heard.
_________________ The NFL need to start fining QB's that throw the ball across my middle... #DangerZone -Kam Chancellor
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:46 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am Posts: 5683 Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen wrote: I actually think that Sherman playing this weekend turns out to be very bad news for the Hawks, unless of course the ruling is overturned. I would much rather have him miss the Arizona game than the first playoff game. Actually with it being the 14th (which is a Friday) it probably means he'll be available for the Bills games as well unless they pretty much instantaneously make a ruling and would start his suspension in less than 48 hours after the appeal is heard. I agree. I'd rather bite the bullet before the playoffs.
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:48 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3523
|
|
Either way, if he is suspended (which is very likely), it will at least give us some time to get the backups up to speed before playoff time.
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
zayden185
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:04 am Posts: 588
|
|
Get it over with please!
is there a backup at the NFL league office for appeals?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:52 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am Posts: 6897 Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
They are going to have a hard time MAKING the playoffs without these guys.
You push theses suspensions back as far as you can.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:54 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3523
|
zayden185 wrote: Get it over with please!
is there a backup at the NFL league office for appeals? I remember reading that the NFL actually set a priority on pushing these appeals through. I think the delay is due to the nature of the appeal, in that the actual testing procedures are being called into question, so both sides need time to prepare experts and/or witnesses to the events. It is a bit different than appealing a fine/suspension from on the field play, or off the field conduct. Those things are essentially set in stone by the CBA, and both the NFLPA and the NFL know how much they can push on each side, and the whole process is just a review of the facts. Failed PED/banned substance tests are a lot more complicated, and have in the past pushed all the way to higher level courts.
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
rjdriver
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:11 am Posts: 590 Location: Utah
|
Tech Worlds wrote: They are going to have a hard time MAKING the playoffs without these guys.
You push theses suspensions back as far as you can. I agree. They are not going to help you out much in the playoffs, if there are no playoffs. Staggering would be ideal. How long after an appeal does it typically take for Genaralisimo Goodell to make a decision? Is it as fast as same day?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SirTed
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:04 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:25 am Posts: 616 Location: Queen Anne
|
|
I've spoken with a few people about this but I haven't seen it posted:
What about the possibility of a reduction to the suspension? Is that possible? Probably unlikely, but it seems to me to a compromise, if in fact that Browner and Sherman have ANY leg to stand on as far as their appeals. if the testing procedure could be questioned maybe they'll reduce the number?
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm Posts: 677 Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
rjdriver wrote: Tech Worlds wrote: They are going to have a hard time MAKING the playoffs without these guys.
You push theses suspensions back as far as you can. I agree. They are not going to help you out much in the playoffs, if there are no playoffs. Staggering would be ideal. I think that's assuming that the drop off will be HUGE from BB/Sherm to our backups. I don't know who Pete will start in their places, but we don't really know how good or bad our backups are yet. Remember when Sherm was like 3rd or 4th string? There's no reason to think lightning can't strike twice.
_________________ "It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Happypuppy
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm Posts: 1043
|
|
They have been staggered before
@thomasbeekers: For example, Sherman drops now and gets suspended, Browner tries to get it schedule two weeks later. Talib/Wright did something similar.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Navyhawkfan187
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am Posts: 504
|
|
Walter Thurmond is a starting caliber NFL CB when healthy. We're not signing loan officers off the street to fill in here, we're expecting legitimate NFL players to step up and do what they're paid to do. Will there be a drop-off? Sure. However, in talking with people that know Carroll's scheme, CB is one of the more fungible positions. If we were to lose Earl it would be a way bigger blow than if we lost Sherm or Browner, regardless of how great we think those two are. Pete relies on his safeties more than his CBs.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Digsbone
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:09 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:25 pm Posts: 175 Location: Anchorage, Alaska
|
|
He just needs to face the music and get it over with, I hate to see the Hawks without him I just don't see how holding out will help the team.
_________________ Digsbone Alaskas Biggest Seahawks fan.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jamsomatic
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:12 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:03 pm Posts: 192 Location: Minneapolis
|
|
Lets win the division and get a first-round bye.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
AnchoviesofTerror
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:19 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2011 10:55 am Posts: 311 Location: LA
|
jamsomatic wrote: Lets win the division and get a first-round bye. theyre suspended 4 games not 4 weeks
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jamsomatic
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:24 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:03 pm Posts: 192 Location: Minneapolis
|
AnchoviesofTerror wrote: jamsomatic wrote: Lets win the division and get a first-round bye. theyre suspended 4 games not 4 weeks Oh.... Are we certain of that? Yes. I'm guessing we are..... Shucks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
T-Sizzle
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am Posts: 1108
|
Digsbone wrote: He just needs to face the music and get it over with, I hate to see the Hawks without him I just don't see how holding out will help the team. If he is not guilty it makes all the sense in the world to appeal.
_________________ "??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk "16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle "OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?"  -ivotuk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am Posts: 1284
|
T-Sizzle wrote: Digsbone wrote: He just needs to face the music and get it over with, I hate to see the Hawks without him I just don't see how holding out will help the team. If he is not guilty it makes all the sense in the world to appeal. It helps the team if he wins his appeal. Sherman isn't an idiot. If he knew he didn't have a shot at appeal i'm sure he would just accept it.
_________________ Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Cartire
|
Post subject: Re: Schefter: Appeal date set for Sherman, not for Browner Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 2:04 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am Posts: 265
|
|
These last 4 games, barring SF, should be wins for us regardless of having the duo. Having them out now would be highly ideal. I would rather have backups vs az, stl, buf, then having them against GB, CHI, NY in the playoffs.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, 12evanf, 12thMan1, Attyla the Hawk, Bill Assumpcao, BlueTalons, BoatsAndHose, CANHawk, Cirmman, DavidSeven, dbmack, DericLee, FlyingGreg, fridayfrenzy, grizbob, H4WKSF4N, Hawken-Dazs, Hawkfan77, Hawks46, Hawksfan78, HoustonHawk82, Jase, jawilljr, Killa Kam, Kixkahn, McGruff, MeenReen, NinerBuff, NinerLifer, preston547, purpleworld, QuickLightning, RecoveringMoraFan, rickychen, SalishHawkFan, Scottemojo, SDHawk, seafence82, SeahawksFanForever, seahawksTopGear, Shaz, Shazor4, Spleenhawk2.0, streets24, tacomahawk, the_12th_man, Throwdown, THUGCAPS, tooshort, TorontoHawk, TwilightError, Veilside, volsunghawk, Zukistubbs and 156 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|