 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson,Luck,Rg3 Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:51 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm Posts: 2667
|
AF_Hawk wrote: I don't understand how anyone considers Luck better than Wilson at this point. The Colts weren't THAT bad last year. They were 2-14. 
_________________ Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson,Luck,Rg3 Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:01 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm Posts: 2667
|
chawx wrote: Meh. Turn on the TV and watch how great Nick Foles looks against Dallas right now. RGIII won't hold up and can't will his teams to wins like Russ...and Luck needs 1000 attempts a game to look decent. 1.) It's clear as day Nick Foles is WAY WAY behind Luck, RG3 and Wilson.. and really he's way behind Weeden and Tannehill too. So when it comes to third round QB's.. JS and PC definitely picked the right guy 2.) RG3 has been fine since his minor concussion. He doesn't play as reckless as Vick, he's much smarter than him. 3.)  at the Luck statement. Such a ridiculous statement. Wilson (Seahawks 8th overall rushing) and RG3 (Redskins 1st overall rushing) have a vastly superior running game at their disposal compared to Luck (Colts 17th overall rushing). So of course Luck is going to throw it more. Way to focus on his completion percentage today though. Look.. Wilson is really becoming a good QB. Today was his best game to date for a whole number of reasons. But trying to diminish Luck and RG3 is hilarious - all three of them are having great years.
_________________ Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
chawx
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson,Luck,Rg3 Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:24 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 7:47 am Posts: 783 Location: Salt Lake City, UT
|
Hasselbeck wrote: chawx wrote: Meh. Turn on the TV and watch how great Nick Foles looks against Dallas right now. RGIII won't hold up and can't will his teams to wins like Russ...and Luck needs 1000 attempts a game to look decent. Quote: 3.)  at the Luck statement. Such a ridiculous statement. Wilson (Seahawks 8th overall rushing) and RG3 (Redskins 1st overall rushing) have a vastly superior running game at their disposal compared to Luck (Colts 17th overall rushing). So of course Luck is going to throw it more. Way to focus on his completion percentage today though.  all you want...but Luck throws far too many INTs for my taste. And you can look at that Colts 17th ranked rush O as a result of the fact that they're mainly calling plays for Luck to throw all the time. Cause and Effect. Now, given the fact Luck was the 1st pick, RGIII was the 2nd pick, and Wilson was the #75th pick... We got MUCH more value and bang for the buck, and more $ left to spend improving our team in other areas. I take Wilson 99.999 times out of a 100 over both. 
_________________  
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, 12th_Bob, 12thManNorth, 671hawk, amac360, Beeker, bellingerga, BirdsCommaAngry, blue 22, BoatsAndHose, chevelle03, Clayfighter, coorslighthawk, CornerHawk, Coug_Hawk08, dbmack, DericLee, Deterrence, EverydayImRusselin, Floridahawk79, FormerEvil, GoldenTater81, grizbob, gtcotcakya, Hasselbeck, HawkAroundTheClock, Hawken-Dazs, Hawkfan77, Hawknballs, HawksBo24, HawksSoc, hazaduz, IBleedBlueAndGreen, ivotuk, Minne, MLTHawk, noflyzone, nsport, NYCoug, Pick6, PlinytheCenter, razgriz737, rj503, ruffENrowdy, ryan419_2002, sam1313, Sarlacc83, Scottemojo, SDHawk, Seahwkgal, Seattle_Stunna_MD, Shaz, Shazor4, SmokinHawk, talic7, TDBinOLY, the ditch, TheHawkster, Tical21, TwistedHusky, TylerDurden, uncle fester, usc17hawk, volsunghawk and 187 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|