| Author |
Message |
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now  Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:10 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4858
|
That trade resulted in us somehow getting Golden Tate. Plus he got us in to the playoffs where we hosed the 'Aints  _________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:16 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
|
Remember when people were clamoring for us to cut Tate in the 2011 preseason finale?
Idiots....
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:44 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7225
|
|
I would have at least considered cutting Tate early in 2011. He really was horrible back then. He couldn't block, he couldn't get open, he'd run backwards 5-10 yards after catching the football. He was an embarrassment. He's obviously the complete opposite of that player now. I have to give the coaching staff props for that. If there was ever a guy who screamed "lost cause", it was a young Golden Tate.
I'd have to think about it a bit, but he might get my vote for the most improved Seahawk I've ever seen. Max Unger would be in the running too.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
Last edited by kearly on Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:46 pm |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11294
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
I don't know, we had the 40th Pick that year, we could've easily taken Tate with that pick had we not did that trade.
_________________  Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:50 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
|
|
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7225
|
Throwdown wrote: I don't know, we had the 40th Pick that year, we could've easily taken Tate with that pick had we not did that trade. That plus we still lost a 3rd rounder. And it's not like CW carried the team on his back against the Rams. In hindsight, I am so glad we won that game against the Rams though. Not just because of the Beastquake- but because if Seattle is picking 8th overall they would have likely drafted Blaine Gabbert. Gabbert was JS's #1 QB that year. _________________ "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bellingerga
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
|
|
By "got us into the playoffs" you mean somehow managed not to cause us to miss the playoffs.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TLD0550
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:50 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 321
|
ivotuk wrote: That trade resulted in us somehow getting Golden Tate. Plus he got us in to the playoffs where we hosed the 'Aints Can you please explain how he had anything to do with us drafting Golden ??
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:50 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6627
|
|
I'm sure SD would do the trade again? Who's in?
_________________
@ryanadamdavis
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:52 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 9964
Location: King In The North
|
kearly wrote: Throwdown wrote: I don't know, we had the 40th Pick that year, we could've easily taken Tate with that pick had we not did that trade. That plus we still lost a 3rd rounder. And it's not like CW carried the team on his back against the Rams. In hindsight, I am so glad we won that game against the Rams though. Not just because of the Beastquake- but because if Seattle is picking 8th overall they would have likely drafted Blaine Gabbert. Gabbert was JS's #1 QB that year. dodged that bullet. _________________   Tanzania¹²
|
|
| |
|
|
|
onanygivensunday
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am
Posts: 2073
|
TLD0550 wrote: ivotuk wrote: That trade resulted in us somehow getting Golden Tate. Plus he got us in to the playoffs where we hosed the 'Aints Can you please explain how he had anything to do with us drafting Golden ??
_________________
"Wilson will come in there pissing lightning and crapping thunder! Watch out!" ... Tech Worlds, 5/9/2012
Endzorn, 3 min. later... "Football aside, I would pay money to see that. I'm serious."
Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 33 years and counting.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TLD0550
|
Post subject: Re: Charlie Whitehurst trade looking pretty good now Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 7:02 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 321
|
|
Charlie had nothing to do with it so "somehow" just seems like an excuse of no facts somehow lol
I would say the only good thing he did for our club was buy us time to Get RW
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 11 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: Aros, City, grizbob, jammerhawk, look@dafilm, LymonHawk, Msfann, Seahawk_Dan, Stephen SeaHawking, TVHAWK, TwilightError and 70 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
