 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Our QB should have had 40 passes today  Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:58 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 8999
|
|
I have never thought this before today. Our offensive line was outmatched in run blocking. Wilson was killing it. We did not play to our strengths today.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:01 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 8676
Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
Yep. But we still could have won had the defense not allowed a 6 play 80 drive in the 4th after Leon gave us the lead.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
oregonhawkfan
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:02 pm |
|
| *SILVER SUPPORTER* |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 1871
|
|
I have always said this about the running game: "If your RB is averaging better than 5 yds per carry, you are not running it enough." Well, today I clearly seen it the other way: "If your QB is completing 78% of his passes, you are not throwing it enough."
_________________
Welcome to Mr. Wilson's Magic Show
Strong safety Kam Chancellor, a 6-foot-3, 232-pound rhinoceros in cleats.....REED ALBERGOTTI
Put them together, and this long-limbed, fleet-a-foot foursome forms a formidable force. ....Clare Farnsworth referencing the "Legion of Boom"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:02 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 8999
|
Tech Worlds wrote: Yep. But we still could have won had the defense not allowed a 6 play 80 drive in the 4th after Leon gave us the lead. Oh, the loss is squarely on the D. Still, Bevell's determination to run today ignored reality.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:03 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 10824
|
|
It's not Bevell, Scotte, and we all know it.
_________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:06 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 8999
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: It's not Bevell, Scotte, and we all know it. True. Pete and Tom's determination to run is more accurate.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:07 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 18721
Location: .Net is full of Postradamuses
|
|
Trying to run in that last drive lost the chance for the win, it is that simple. RW was on fire, and it was completely ignored for whatever reason. And thank you Baldwin for dropping a perfectly thrown ball on a critical 3rd down.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:13 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9921
|
|
I love this point because its brilliant. And hate that it was such a simple point, Scott made it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:15 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 8999
|
|
I am simply brilliant.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
scutterhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 3:32 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 2636
|
Tech Worlds wrote: Yep. But we still could have won had the defense not allowed a 6 play 80 drive in the 4th after Leon gave us the lead. 1st the Lions 4th quarter win, and now the Phins? Hell, I KNEW that the Seahawks were going to run on 1st down on every outing,,, nice job fooling the Dolphins Defense eh? When the Phins took the que from how to play the Seahawks from the Lions, it was imparitive that THAT game plan needed to be etch-a-sketched, and some NEW strategies put in place. Most of the blame needs to go to the Coaching for this loss.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
edogg23
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 7:26 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:30 pm
Posts: 363
|
|
I agree with this post 1000%.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dbsn2420
|
Post subject: Re: Our QB should have had 40 passes today Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 8:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:59 pm
Posts: 664
Location: Bremerton
|
|
Not just that RW was throwing well, he can also run, no bootlegs, no QB Draws, no Roll Outs, there's got to be some plays in the book to utilize Wilson's legs. A well timed QB run can kill a D in a heartbeat. Saw a couple QB read options today, but the Phins were all over it.
_________________
Beast Mode 05 Sep 12 - "And then with our defense playing the way that they've been playing, we don't even need an offense."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12HawkFan, 1caliseahawk, 4BlatantAgent9, AbsolutNET, Agcat, amac360, anthony4r, ArmyHawk, Basis4day, BCHawk, bei, BGHawk, Bigpumpkin, billyberu, Bitter, BlueTalons, BlueThunder, CalboHawk, CandlestickBum, CarkosEnFuego, CharlieCobra, ChrisB Bacon, Cirmman, cnjvh, coorslighthawk, Coug_Hawk08, Crabhawk, DaveG, Davehawk, DavidSeven, dbmack, dbsn2420, Deterrence, docj78, Donk70, DoubleTrouble, dradee, drdiags, Exploding, fishingfanatic, FloridaSeahawk18, FlyingGreg, flyingHigh, FriscosFinest, Frohawk25360, gargantual, gladdy206, GoHawks, gonzhawk, Google Adsense [Bot], Google [Bot], Greenhell, halps80, hangumhi, Hasselbeck, hawk45, HawkCop, hawker84, hawkfan1975, hawkfannj, HawkGANG, HawkHack, HawkinInLA, HawkNuts, Hawkpower, hawks4thewin, HawksBo24, hawksfanohio, HawksRawk, Hendo66, Hollandhawk, homerun1970, HoRneR, hotroute101, hulbe, hyrailyn, i5roadrunner, IcedHawk, IllWill49, Infamous425, JacksSpleen, jasehawk, Jayburd14, Jazzhawk, jblaze, JerHawk81, JimZorn10, jonesy7748, Jville, kamikazehawk, Kixkahn, KK84, kmedic, lacenterhawk, Lawke, legend38, lobohawk, lvnginhwktwn, LymonHawk, Majestic-12 [Bot], Manbearpig99, marco47, Marlin Man, mickyjr, MidwestHawker, mikeak, misTer, Mitch, MontanaHawk05, mrblitz, MrCarey, Mtjhoyas, nanomoz, Nateruw, nepahawk, NFSeahawks628, NJlargent, NM-Hawk, NWOhioHawk, okhawkfan, OkieHawk, OLYhawks, Onyx, Osprey, parson420, Paschtorian, plyka, Popeyejones, PortlandHawk, PryorFamily, pugs1, rainger, RampagingMice, razgriz737, red17hawk, redeye81, RezHawk, RolandDeschain, RussellMania, scutterhawk, seabowl, seahawkfreak, SeahawkFrost, SeahawkNAtl, SeahawksEast, seahawksfanatic000, SeahawksMSHing, Seahawkx, Seanhawk, Seaswab, SeatownJay, seattlest7, SeaWolv, seedhawk, SeeHawkRun, Shaz, SHOCKER315, skg, slipwax, SmokinHawk, Snohomie, SoCalHawk, socalhawker333, stiritup81, sutz, Swedishhawkfan, symmes, Taehwk, Tanzania12, Tempest_Crow, The Great Hawktini, THE TABS, thecycle, theENGLISHseahawk, TheHawkster, therealjohncarlson, Thursday, Timmahawk, Tmagopis, Tokadub, TOPHawk, Tune, TwistedHusky, twisted_steel2, VancitySeahawk, VaporHawk, Veilside, VivaEfrenHerrera, Wartooth, Wenhawk, Whiskeyjack44, White Devil, White Knight, WilsonLegend, WilsonMVP, yeash28, zhawk and 612 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
