| Author |
Message |
|
glowingeyedseahawk
|
Post subject: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ??  Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:20 pm |
|
| * PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
Posts: 438
Location: Sinking Spring, PA
|
|
_________________
Go Hawks !!
~ ( in my best Russell impersonation )
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
sam1313
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:21 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 1631
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
|
and he could have just pummelled Tannehill instead. Crap.
_________________
[RE Lynch's foot injury] He'll be fine. Better to rest him at this point. Pretty sure he has the playbook down.
"Get ball from Wilson, run over bitches".
Hasselbeck
|
|
| |
|
|
|
m0ng0
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:55 pm
Posts: 1740
Location: Battle Ground, Wa
|
|
dude was airborne, not much he could do to adjust in flight.........sh*t happens, I could point to many more plays that cost us this game
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SalishHawkFan
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 2699
|
|
Oh, I thought you were talking about the TD pass where Leroy got burned. My thought was "what the heck is ET doing in the endzone and not coming over to pick up the WR who had immediately burned Leroy?" How the heck could he have not seen that? It was the WR that instantly demanded immediate attention from the center fielder and yet ET was on some other planet chatting with Emperor Ming or something cuz he was light years from the play and with his speed, he had all day to get there. THAT was the game right there.
_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:31 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1195
|
|
If we are talking about the penalty, then it was the right call, but its one of the dumbest things in sports. Contrary to popular belief, ET is not actually a wizard and had no way to change his path when he jumped. They either need to change it to a judgement call, get rid of it completely, or start flagging the QB for just standing there and creating an injury risk when he could have just stepped 1 foot to his right.
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
glowingeyedseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:34 pm |
|
| * PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan * |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
Posts: 438
Location: Sinking Spring, PA
|
m0ng0 wrote: dude was airborne, not much he could do to adjust in flight.........sh*t happens, I could point to many more plays that cost us this game I don't buy this...... You could see him (on camera) coming from 10 yards away..... If you're gonna hit Tannen-bomb, why not go mid-section ?? IMO ....he could've held-up or veered off.....he had time to anticipate !!??
_________________
Go Hawks !!
~ ( in my best Russell impersonation )
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:36 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1195
|
|
He went airborne to try to deflect the pass and/or disrupt the QBs vision, why would he slow down? We want our guys to stop giving 100%?
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
AbsolutNET
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:41 pm |
|
| * NET X's & O's Guru * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 6861
Location: PNW
|
glowingeyedseahawk wrote: m0ng0 wrote: dude was airborne, not much he could do to adjust in flight.........sh*t happens, I could point to many more plays that cost us this game I don't buy this...... You could see him (on camera) coming from 10 yards away..... If you're gonna hit Tannen-bomb, why not go mid-section ?? IMO ....he could've held-up or veered off.....he had time to anticipate !!?? Maybe on the 3rd slow-motion replay from your couch he had time to anticipate. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
glowingeyedseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:48 pm |
|
| * PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan * |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
Posts: 438
Location: Sinking Spring, PA
|
AbsolutNET wrote: glowingeyedseahawk wrote: m0ng0 wrote: dude was airborne, not much he could do to adjust in flight.........sh*t happens, I could point to many more plays that cost us this game I don't buy this...... You could see him (on camera) coming from 10 yards away..... If you're gonna hit Tannen-bomb, why not go mid-section ?? IMO ....he could've held-up or veered off.....he had time to anticipate !!?? Maybe on the 3rd slow-motion replay from your couch he had time to anticipate. ....all I'm sayin' is; the t.v. coverage didn't even show a flag being thrown/penalty called (at all) .....but you could see ET roughing Tannenbaum as the play shifted to the endzone. 
_________________
Go Hawks !!
~ ( in my best Russell impersonation )
|
|
| |
|
|
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 2742
|
glowingeyedseahawk wrote: m0ng0 wrote: dude was airborne, not much he could do to adjust in flight.........sh*t happens, I could point to many more plays that cost us this game I don't buy this...... You could see him (on camera) coming from 10 yards away..... If you're gonna hit Tannen-bomb, why not go mid-section ?? IMO ....he could've held-up or veered off.....he had time to anticipate !!?? Because he was attempting to bat away the ball... hence why he went in high with his hands up
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:54 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1195
|
|
There was really nothing ET could have done different, other than give up and give no effort at all, but hes probably saving that for the pro bowl. He got flagged for not being a quitter.
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mistaowen
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 5:57 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 1:54 pm
Posts: 1205
|
|
This place is unbearable today
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:06 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 2702
|
|
To be fair.. the Washington KO return basically washed that off the board. It was the following defensive series that went a long way to deciding the outcome of the game.
_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rideaducati
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 556
|
|
What was the Jets GM doing on the field?
Last edited by rideaducati on Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
glowingeyedseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:12 pm |
|
| * PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan * |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
Posts: 438
Location: Sinking Spring, PA
|
Hasselbeck wrote: To be fair.. the Washington KO return basically washed that off the board. It was the following defensive series that went a long way to deciding the outcome of the game. To be fair.... You are CORRECT !!But now is the time for finger pointing.... I'd rather take 7 points off the board for the fish.... Leon can get his TD return on the next Miami punt !!?? Win, the way it was suppose to be - - by 14 pts.
_________________
Go Hawks !!
~ ( in my best Russell impersonation )
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rideaducati
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 556
|
|
Oops... Triple threads are confusing to me.
Last edited by rideaducati on Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:13 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 2742
|
glowingeyedseahawk wrote: Hasselbeck wrote: To be fair.. the Washington KO return basically washed that off the board. It was the following defensive series that went a long way to deciding the outcome of the game. To be fair.... You are CORRECT !!But now is the time for finger pointing.... I'd rather take 7 points off the board for the fish.... Leon can get his TD return on the next Miami punt !!??Win, the way it was suppose to be - - by 14 pts. Yes... because this is how events in our universe work 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bellingerga
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:14 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 4996
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
|
AbsolutNET wrote: glowingeyedseahawk wrote: m0ng0 wrote: dude was airborne, not much he could do to adjust in flight.........sh*t happens, I could point to many more plays that cost us this game I don't buy this...... You could see him (on camera) coming from 10 yards away..... If you're gonna hit Tannen-bomb, why not go mid-section ?? IMO ....he could've held-up or veered off.....he had time to anticipate !!?? Maybe on the 3rd slow-motion replay from your couch he had time to anticipate. LOL dude...awesome
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:14 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
|
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 2702
|
glowingeyedseahawk wrote: Hasselbeck wrote: To be fair.. the Washington KO return basically washed that off the board. It was the following defensive series that went a long way to deciding the outcome of the game. To be fair.... You are CORRECT !!But now is the time for finger pointing.... I'd rather take 7 points off the board for the fish.... Leon can get his TD return on the next Miami punt !!?? Win, the way it was suppose to be - - by 14 pts. That'd be ideal of course.. but the fact is.. 15 seconds later the defense had a 7 point lead again, and the Dolphins weren't inside the 20.. they were 80 yards away. Can't pin the loss on an iffy call (which IMO was a very weak roughing the QB).. when the defense had ample opportunity to seal the deal
_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
| |
|
|
|
glowingeyedseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: play of the game......what the heck was ET thinking ?? Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2012 6:15 pm |
|
| * PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan * |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
Posts: 438
Location: Sinking Spring, PA
|
rideaducati wrote:
What was the Jets GM doing on the field?
For jokes, I'm calling Tannehill....Tannenbaum 
_________________
Go Hawks !!
~ ( in my best Russell impersonation )
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thMode, AVL, bellingerga, CFraychineaud, dbmack, Dismas, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], McG, pnwhawk25, Shadyhawk182, Spounge84, Starrman44, TDBinOLY, Terpdragon, TheHawkster, therealjohncarlson, xCalibur, XxXdragonXxX and 96 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
