 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 16 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison.  Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 1390
|
I hesitated on this one... but Hawkblogger has some great numbers stuff up right now, so, sorry if you're tired of this but might as well get some stats out there, this is a good compilation. http://www.hawkblogger.com/_________________ 
|
|
  |
|
|
|
aku
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:05 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:50 am
Posts: 116
|
Here's the permalink since they probably won't stay on the front page too long. I've only read the first post so far, but it's neat stuff.  Now if Wilson can just maintain that 130 passer rating the trend will look perfect.  (Oh that's actually from the third post by the way... glanced at it when I was on the front page.)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:07 am |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 14922
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
Homie is efficient as all hell ain't he?
_________________  3elieve
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ruminator
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:37 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:52 pm
Posts: 205
|
|
Look forward to seeing an updated chart after Week 16.
_________________
The 2013 Seahawks: NFL's first and only crap-your-pants stellar team
|
|
| |
|
|
|
twelfman
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:05 pm |
|
| *BRONZE SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Thu May 07, 2009 4:06 pm
Posts: 499
|
|
Wilson , with a completely opened up offense and some more reciever weapons next year, mmmmm
What a great read
Pete opening up the o slowly was killing me by game four but i feel confident they are a good team just about to be great at the right time
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:54 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 3291
|
|
Tannehill seems to be the only one of the 5 that is seemingly coming apart down the stretch. Hope that continues to be the case next weekend.
_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
| |
|
|
|
garydrake425
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 902
Location: Everett, Wa
|
|
Love it. Yeah i'd like to see this chart at years end as well. Tannehill's rating will be on a downfall with the Seahawks in town.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:01 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1329
Location: Victoria BC
|
SNDavidson wrote: I hesitated on this one... but Hawkblogger has some great numbers stuff up right now, so, sorry if you're tired of this but might as well get some stats out there, this is a good compilation. http://www.hawkblogger.com/Yes awesome stuff Hawkblogger has been doing. I just wish the great ESPN that pretends to be the knower of all info would do as in depth.
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 1390
|
|
"Russell Wilson has made headlines with a home passer rating that not only leads all rookies, but leads all NFL quarterbacks. The flip side is that he has had the worst road passer rating of any of the rookie quarterbacks. He is roughly half the player on the road, up until now. It should be noted that three of his five road contests came in the first four weeks of the season, and we know that he is a much different quarterback now than he was then. His last road game was against Detroit, a Top 10 defense, where he finished with a 96.8 rating."
Also, in those games, he was being held back. Important to consider.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:10 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
|
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 3291
|
SNDavidson wrote: "Russell Wilson has made headlines with a home passer rating that not only leads all rookies, but leads all NFL quarterbacks. The flip side is that he has had the worst road passer rating of any of the rookie quarterbacks. He is roughly half the player on the road, up until now. It should be noted that three of his five road contests came in the first four weeks of the season, and we know that he is a much different quarterback now than he was then. His last road game was against Detroit, a Top 10 defense, where he finished with a 96.8 rating."
Also, in those games, he was being held back. Important to consider. I think this road rating is misleading. The WR's did him NO favors in San Francisco. In St. Louis I think 2 of the 3 picks he threw were on the WR's and not Wilson. Wilson has actually played pretty well on the road all things considered. The team just makes a fatal error at the worst possible time to screw the pooch. That's what they need to correct more than anything.
_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:25 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1329
Location: Victoria BC
|
Hasselbeck wrote: SNDavidson wrote: "Russell Wilson has made headlines with a home passer rating that not only leads all rookies, but leads all NFL quarterbacks. The flip side is that he has had the worst road passer rating of any of the rookie quarterbacks. He is roughly half the player on the road, up until now. It should be noted that three of his five road contests came in the first four weeks of the season, and we know that he is a much different quarterback now than he was then. His last road game was against Detroit, a Top 10 defense, where he finished with a 96.8 rating."
Also, in those games, he was being held back. Important to consider. I think this road rating is misleading. The WR's did him NO favors in San Francisco. In St. Louis I think 2 of the 3 picks he threw were on the WR's and not Wilson. Wilson has actually played pretty well on the road all things considered. The team just makes a fatal error at the worst possible time to screw the pooch. That's what they need to correct more than anything. Could not agree with you more 
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeaTown81
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:28 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 4483
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Hasselbeck wrote: SNDavidson wrote: "Russell Wilson has made headlines with a home passer rating that not only leads all rookies, but leads all NFL quarterbacks. The flip side is that he has had the worst road passer rating of any of the rookie quarterbacks. He is roughly half the player on the road, up until now. It should be noted that three of his five road contests came in the first four weeks of the season, and we know that he is a much different quarterback now than he was then. His last road game was against Detroit, a Top 10 defense, where he finished with a 96.8 rating."
Also, in those games, he was being held back. Important to consider. I think this road rating is misleading. The WR's did him NO favors in San Francisco. In St. Louis I think 2 of the 3 picks he threw were on the WR's and not Wilson. Wilson has actually played pretty well on the road all things considered. The team just makes a fatal error at the worst possible time to screw the pooch. That's what they need to correct more than anything. Agree with all of this. But why did you just post this in another thread? Hasselbeck wrote: He's been lights out at home for the most part. Hope that begins to translate over to the road games.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawk Strap
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:37 pm |
|
| * Handsome * |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:37 pm
Posts: 2256
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
I have a burning in my loins that Luck will be a stat master.
And Wilson will be a champion.
Burn thou loins, burn
_________________
"it'd be a newborn deer" - pehawk
|
|
| |
|
|
|
PlinytheCenter
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:34 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 2528
Location: In Bruges
|
|
Luck threw two INT's for TD's today. Bwahahaha
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:01 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
|
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 3291
|
SeaTown81 wrote: Hasselbeck wrote: SNDavidson wrote: "Russell Wilson has made headlines with a home passer rating that not only leads all rookies, but leads all NFL quarterbacks. The flip side is that he has had the worst road passer rating of any of the rookie quarterbacks. He is roughly half the player on the road, up until now. It should be noted that three of his five road contests came in the first four weeks of the season, and we know that he is a much different quarterback now than he was then. His last road game was against Detroit, a Top 10 defense, where he finished with a 96.8 rating."
Also, in those games, he was being held back. Important to consider. I think this road rating is misleading. The WR's did him NO favors in San Francisco. In St. Louis I think 2 of the 3 picks he threw were on the WR's and not Wilson. Wilson has actually played pretty well on the road all things considered. The team just makes a fatal error at the worst possible time to screw the pooch. That's what they need to correct more than anything. Agree with all of this. But why did you just post this in another thread? Hasselbeck wrote: He's been lights out at home for the most part. Hope that begins to translate over to the road games. Well.. I guess I meant in the "W" column more than anything.
_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jlwaters1
|
Post subject: Re: Russell Wilson numbers/comparison. Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 2103
|
Hawk Strap wrote: I have a burning in my loins that
Luck will be a stat master.
And Wilson will be a champion.
Burn thou loins, burn So Luck is the Manning to RW's Brady (early career when he was winning Super Bowls.) I really like what I see from RW. This weekend will be a statement game. I'm hoping it's a good statement.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 16 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thMan1, 47degreesn, 707HAWKfan, AbsolutNET, Alexander, Allweatherfan, Anthony!, Axx, b3liever, BALL HAWKER, BAllenHawk, Barthawk, Basis4day, benthebeerman, blanikbrat, BlueTalons, BoatsAndHose, brendonkuhn, bryantology79, Chamberlain, Chapow, chevelle03, Chukarhawk, CrimsonWazzu, daketah, dbmack, Digsbone, DontRussellWithMe, drdiags, E.C. Laloosh, Erebus, Evil_Shenanigans, Exploding, FDNYHAWK, fenderbender123, FlyingGreg, formido, Fudwamper, getnasty, Google [Bot], gubernaculum, halps80, HansGruber, Hasselbeck, hawk45, HawkCop, HawkDfence, hawker84, Hawkfan4life, HawkFan72, HawkFanNC, Hawknballs, hawksfansinceday1, Hawk_Nation, homerun1970, jack_patera, jawilljr, jblaze, JGreen79, kearly, kf3339, kthebestwayw, Largent80, largenutz, LawlessHawk, Maelstrom787, MagHawk, Majestic-12 [Bot], Meeker, MichaelHawk70, mickyjr, mikeak, Milehighhawk, Missing_Clink, mrblitz, Nateruw, nepahawk, NFSeahawks628, Njhawkboss, NoTurnUnstoned, ODS, onanygivensunday, OrFan, Pick6, plyka, Polaris, Popeyejones, ramchargerman66, red17hawk, renofox, rightbench, rjas77, RobBaker7714409, Rocket, RockHawk, RolandDeschain, Schubie, ScouseSeahawk, SeahawkFrost, seahawksfan28, Seahwkgal, SilNWest, slipwax, suppaball, the ditch, Throwdown, Tical21, tjgamer555, Uncle Si, VB Hawk, VivaEfrenHerrera, volsunghawk, YaktownHawK and 341 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
