 |
| Author |
Message |
|
12thMan1
|
Post subject: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely  Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:41 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:19 am
Posts: 718
|
|
_________________
Status: Active lieutenant in the 12th Man Army
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2633
|
|
Maybe if this was written after week 3 he would have a more compelling argument.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
peachesenregalia
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:47 am |
|
| * NET Starfish * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 10100
Location: Helm's Deep
|
|
Bleacher report, eh?
Nawww....I'm not reading that...
_________________
Rzzzzz...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SalishHawkFan
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:53 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4165
|
|
Lol, I bit. Did you know Tannenhill is best against the blitz and the Hawks like to bring extra rushers like IRVIN? Hahahaha! Irvin is now an "extra rusher". LOL!
And RT is good with the deep ball. Deep ball? Ask Rodgers how well trying to throw deep vs the Hawks works. RT will get carted off the field if all he's got is a good deep ball.
And finally, he brought up the Green Bay game.
Total idiot.
_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.
R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahwkgal
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:22 am |
|
| * NET Hottie * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 2013
|
|
Until the Hawks can win another road game, I can see why the media gives the Phins a chance. I do. Sorry guys...and yeah, the author is an idiot but this will not be an easy game. We HAVE to win, NOW.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FidelisHawk
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:37 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:39 am
Posts: 325
|
|
Well, he does make some valid points and our road woes are well chronicled (and not just THIS season either), but IMHO Miami will need to play a perfect game AND the Seahawks will have to make more than a couple errors, on both sides of the ball, for them to lose this game…
_________________
"Est autem fides credere quod nondum vides; cuius fidei merces est videre quod credis."
Faith is to believe what you do not see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe.
(St. Augustine of Hippo)
"Perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim."
(“Ovid”)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bmorepunk
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:43 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:56 pm
Posts: 311
|
SalishHawkFan wrote: Lol, I bit. Did you know Tannenhill is best against the blitz and the Hawks like to bring extra rushers like IRVIN? Hahahaha! Irvin is now an "extra rusher". LOL!
And RT is good with the deep ball. Deep ball? Ask Rodgers how well trying to throw deep vs the Hawks works. RT will get carted off the field if all he's got is a good deep ball.
And finally, he brought up the Green Bay game.
Total idiot. He should just write: It's a road game. It's the Seahawks. That's sound reasoning. Agreed on the extra rusher. Whoever wrote this hasn't watched this defense.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 9:54 am |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 10826
Location: Gibsons, BC Canada
|
|
OH NOEZ.... DAVON BESS!!!!! LOL. He looks like Richard Sherman's lesbian sister.
_________________ Dr. Seuss wrote: From there to here, from here to there, EARL THOMAS is everywhere... #FREEBROWNER
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BlueTalons
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:04 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 1111
Location: Spanaway, WA
|
SalishHawkFan wrote: Lol, I bit. Did you know Tannenhill is best against the blitz and the Hawks like to bring extra rushers like IRVIN? Hahahaha! Irvin is now an "extra rusher". LOL! I laughed when I saw that too! _________________  "Make good teams look bad and make bad teams look terrible!" -Michael Robinson
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jlwaters1
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:15 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 2235
|
|
Pretty worthless article. I'm pretty sure that the Fins just lost to the Bills and didn't score and offensive TD. The Dolphins are ripe for the taking. The question is weather or not the Seahawks will TAKE IT! They did it with our past 2 home games beating teams they should beat. They Absolutely need this one.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:23 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2269
|
|
I watched the Dolphins vs. Bills game, those are two dumpster fire teams nowhere close to being considered "playoff caliber."
If the Hawks consider themselves a playoff team, we have no business losing to a team like the Dolphins.
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:29 am |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
|
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 10826
Location: Gibsons, BC Canada
|
|
The only "fact" that "article" got right was the fact we stink on the road. Unfortunately... that's very correct. But Miami really sucks and we were able to go down to Carolina and beat that garbage team, so Miami should be pretty do-able as well.
PS I hate the Dolphins uniforms. How was it that people used to make fun of "Seahawk Blue" but "Dolphin WTF is that, green?" gets a pass? Oh and you're going to just go ahead and put orange in there too? SMH
_________________ Dr. Seuss wrote: From there to here, from here to there, EARL THOMAS is everywhere... #FREEBROWNER
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Erebus
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:33 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:53 pm
Posts: 601
Location: Ft. Meade, MD
|
|
While I disagree with parts of the article, its a sign of respect that someone has to come up with reasons (albiet incorrect) that the Dolphins can beat the Seahawks. In years past they would be overlooking this game as an easy win.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:40 am |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 14048
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Every click you give them adds money to their pockets. Don't encourage this stupidity.
_________________
Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MidwestHawker
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:44 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:26 am
Posts: 1033
Location: Indianapolis
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: If the Hawks consider themselves a playoff team, we have no business losing to a team like the Dolphins. People insist on saying things like this, as though the majority of playoff teams don't have a loss to a 6-10 or worse team on their resume during the season.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:06 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2269
|
MidwestHawker wrote: Sgt. Largent wrote: If the Hawks consider themselves a playoff team, we have no business losing to a team like the Dolphins. People insist on saying things like this, as though the majority of playoff teams don't have a loss to a 6-10 or worse team on their resume during the season. Yeah well we already have a couple of those on our resume. Good teams beat bad teams, even on the road.
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:15 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: MidwestHawker wrote: Sgt. Largent wrote: If the Hawks consider themselves a playoff team, we have no business losing to a team like the Dolphins. People insist on saying things like this, as though the majority of playoff teams don't have a loss to a 6-10 or worse team on their resume during the season. Yeah well we already have a couple of those on our resume. Good teams beat bad teams, even on the road. By that reasoning, here is a list of other teams that are not good: Green Bay (lost to Indy 30-27; despite the 6-4 record, Indy is a bad team that does only one thing well... generate yards on offense) New England (lost to Arizona 20-18, at home no less) Baltimore (lost to a bad Philly team) Pittsburgh (lost to Oakland and Tennessee, even before they lost Roethlisberger) New York Giants (also lost to Philly) Atlanta (lost to New Orleans, a team that can't play defense and lost to Washington on their own field) _________________  Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:45 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2269
|
volsunghawk wrote:
By that reasoning, here is a list of other teams that are not good:
Green Bay (lost to Indy 30-27; despite the 6-4 record, Indy is a bad team that does only one thing well... generate yards on offense)
New England (lost to Arizona 20-18, at home no less)
Baltimore (lost to a bad Philly team)
Pittsburgh (lost to Oakland and Tennessee, even before they lost Roethlisberger)
New York Giants (also lost to Philly)
Atlanta (lost to New Orleans, a team that can't play defense and lost to Washington on their own field)
Miami is nowhere close to the quality that these teams were early on in the season (save for maybe Oakland), which is when most of these "bad" teams beat the better teams.........and NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE wants to play the Saints right now. I still stand by the fact that there's no reason we shouldn't go into Miami after the bye week and beat a bad Dolphins team. If the Hawks don't win, it's not a death blow, but it'll say a lot about what our chances are going down to stretch to make the playoffs.
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:59 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 7507
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: volsunghawk wrote:
By that reasoning, here is a list of other teams that are not good:
Green Bay (lost to Indy 30-27; despite the 6-4 record, Indy is a bad team that does only one thing well... generate yards on offense)
New England (lost to Arizona 20-18, at home no less)
Baltimore (lost to a bad Philly team)
Pittsburgh (lost to Oakland and Tennessee, even before they lost Roethlisberger)
New York Giants (also lost to Philly)
Atlanta (lost to New Orleans, a team that can't play defense and lost to Washington on their own field)
Miami is nowhere close to the quality that these teams were early on in the season (save for maybe Oakland), which is when most of these "bad" teams beat the better teams.........and NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE wants to play the Saints right now. I still stand by the fact that there's no reason we shouldn't go into Miami after the bye week and beat a bad Dolphins team. If the Hawks don't win, it's not a death blow, but it'll say a lot about what our chances are going down to stretch to make the playoffs. I agree that we should beat Miami. However, I disagree that the outcome of any one game "says a lot" about our team's chances - that is, unless the one game is a game where we can either clinch a playoff spot or be eliminated from the postseason. Dom said it best earlier... teams are defined by the entire 16-game season, not by one game here or there where people have expectations about what should occur. New Orleans, as you pointed out, is an excellent example. They were an easy out early in the season, and are a dangerous team right now. Still, they started out 0-4, and I guarantee you there were people on their boards going into that 4th game saying, "This is a game a playoff team wins, no question." They lost to the CHIEFS of all teams - at home. By the assertions that tend to be tossed around here at .NET, there's no way the Saints are a good team. They just can't be because of who they've lost games to and how many they lost in a row. But see, I don't buy that. I think the Saints are still playoff-caliber, and I think Seattle is playoff-caliber as well. Losing to Miami won't change that... it'll just make getting into the postseason a bit tougher. _________________ Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BlueTalons
|
Post subject: Re: I suppose anythings possible; but not likely Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 1111
Location: Spanaway, WA
|
|
Sometimes it's not all about who you play but when you play them.
_________________ "Make good teams look bad and make bad teams look terrible!" -Michael Robinson
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thManNorth, 45Hawker, 98pack_09hawks, AbsolutNET, AgentDib, amill87, aredub, BAJAHAWK, BamKam, Barthawk, Bill Assumpcao, blanikbrat, brimsalabim, Cartire, chihawk, Cinque52, coach78, Coxal, CPHawk, CurryStopstheRuns, davidonmi, Digsbone, doughboy63, dradee, drcool, drdevin, drdiags, EverydayImRusselin, fisholot, Floridahawk79, Gcheck2181, Google Adsense [Bot], Google [Bot], Guardian, Hawk Strap, HawkAroundTheClock, HawkFan72, HawkHouse, HAWKS2theBONE, HawkStar22, homerun1970, Jase, jdemps, Jeremy517, JimZorn10, Jville, kaygojinghi, kearly, kobebryant, Kooshster, Lawke, longsh0t, M2MG, Maelstrom787, marko358, Meeker, misfit, Missing_Clink, MizzouHawks, MontanaHawk05, MVP53, Natethegreat, NFSeahawks628, nwgamer, NYCoug, oldhawkfan, ottawahawkfan, peachesenregalia, Perfundle, renofox, rj503, RolandDeschain, Seahawkfan80, SeahawksFanForever, SeahawksMSHing, Seahawkwalt1967, Seaswab, Sgt. Largent, Skottt, Slick, smoothmaw, Snakeeyes007, SPRC, sutz, tacomahawk, the ditch, theascension, thecycle, TheGreenMan, TwilightError, Uncle Si, usChawks, White Devil, wnywvuseahawk, Yahoo [Bot], Yxes1122, zack803 and 316 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
