SalishHawkFan wrote:Lol, I bit. Did you know Tannenhill is best against the blitz and the Hawks like to bring extra rushers like IRVIN? Hahahaha! Irvin is now an "extra rusher". LOL!
And RT is good with the deep ball. Deep ball? Ask Rodgers how well trying to throw deep vs the Hawks works. RT will get carted off the field if all he's got is a good deep ball.
And finally, he brought up the Green Bay game.
Total idiot.
SalishHawkFan wrote:Lol, I bit. Did you know Tannenhill is best against the blitz and the Hawks like to bring extra rushers like IRVIN? Hahahaha! Irvin is now an "extra rusher". LOL!
Sgt. Largent wrote:If the Hawks consider themselves a playoff team, we have no business losing to a team like the Dolphins.
MidwestHawker wrote:Sgt. Largent wrote:If the Hawks consider themselves a playoff team, we have no business losing to a team like the Dolphins.
People insist on saying things like this, as though the majority of playoff teams don't have a loss to a 6-10 or worse team on their resume during the season.
Sgt. Largent wrote:MidwestHawker wrote:Sgt. Largent wrote:If the Hawks consider themselves a playoff team, we have no business losing to a team like the Dolphins.
People insist on saying things like this, as though the majority of playoff teams don't have a loss to a 6-10 or worse team on their resume during the season.
Yeah well we already have a couple of those on our resume.
Good teams beat bad teams, even on the road.
volsunghawk wrote:
By that reasoning, here is a list of other teams that are not good:
Green Bay (lost to Indy 30-27; despite the 6-4 record, Indy is a bad team that does only one thing well... generate yards on offense)
New England (lost to Arizona 20-18, at home no less)
Baltimore (lost to a bad Philly team)
Pittsburgh (lost to Oakland and Tennessee, even before they lost Roethlisberger)
New York Giants (also lost to Philly)
Atlanta (lost to New Orleans, a team that can't play defense and lost to Washington on their own field)
Sgt. Largent wrote:volsunghawk wrote:
By that reasoning, here is a list of other teams that are not good:
Green Bay (lost to Indy 30-27; despite the 6-4 record, Indy is a bad team that does only one thing well... generate yards on offense)
New England (lost to Arizona 20-18, at home no less)
Baltimore (lost to a bad Philly team)
Pittsburgh (lost to Oakland and Tennessee, even before they lost Roethlisberger)
New York Giants (also lost to Philly)
Atlanta (lost to New Orleans, a team that can't play defense and lost to Washington on their own field)
Miami is nowhere close to the quality that these teams were early on in the season (save for maybe Oakland), which is when most of these "bad" teams beat the better teams.........and NO ONE, and I mean NO ONE wants to play the Saints right now.
I still stand by the fact that there's no reason we shouldn't go into Miami after the bye week and beat a bad Dolphins team. If the Hawks don't win, it's not a death blow, but it'll say a lot about what our chances are going down to stretch to make the playoffs.
BlueTalons wrote:Sometimes it's not all about who you play but when you play them.
BlueTalons wrote:Sometimes it's not all about who you play but when you play them.
Seahwkgal wrote:Until the Hawks can win another road game, I can see why the media gives the Phins a chance. I do. Sorry guys...and yeah, the author is an idiot but this will not be an easy game. We HAVE to win, NOW.
It is currently Sat Apr 21, 2018 4:11 am
Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]