 |
| Author |
Message |
|
nategreat
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle?  Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:57 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 942
|
|
ESPN is wrong, NFL.com is right.
ESPN has the correct tie-breaking procedure written on their site (a replica of what's on NFL.com), however, they didn't seem to think it through before putting up their playoff seeds. Which makes sense, because they literally went up RIGHT after the Bucs game- in an effort to be the quickest, they completely failed at giving any sort of accuracy.
_________________ 
|
|
  |
|
|
|
XxXdragonXxX
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:02 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:40 am
Posts: 907
Location: Enumclaw, WA
|
Just in case anyone is still confused..... http://www.nfl.com/standings/tiebreakingproceduresQuote: Three or More Clubs
(Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are eliminated, tie breaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-club format.)
1. Apply division tie breaker to eliminate all but the highest ranked club in each division prior to proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie breaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two Wild-Card participants. This does not apply, all 3 are still tied, move to step 2. Quote: 2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.) Minnesota lost to both Tampa and Seattle and therefore are elminated. It is now a 2 way tie between Seattle and Tampa. Quote: (Note: If two clubs remain tied after third or other clubs are eliminated, tie breaker reverts to step 1 of applicable two-club format.)
1. Head-to-head, if applicable. Not applicable Quote: Step 2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference. Seahawks are 4-4, Buccaneers are 3-4. Seahawks get the 6th seed, ESPN is wrong. _________________ 
Last edited by XxXdragonXxX on Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
peachesenregalia
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:03 pm |
|
| * NET Starfish * |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 8771
Location: Vaes Dothrak
|
|
There. Are. Six. More. Weeks. Of. Football. To. Play.
This is a complete non-story right now.
_________________
FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1185
Location: Victoria BC
|
edogg23 wrote: rainger wrote: jkitsune wrote: They have it wrong. First tiebreaker is head to head. Yup what he said Typical ESPN shit. I have grown to really dislike them over the last few years. Or read the thread and realize ESPN is right.  Or maybe you need to study the process a bit further and realize they are not.
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl
|
|
| |
|
|
|
oregonhawkfan
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:04 pm |
|
| *SILVER SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 1636
|
|
Well dammit, if only they would let us play the rest of our schedule we might have made it. At least there is always next year.
_________________
Strong safety Kam Chancellor, a 6-foot-3, 232-pound rhinoceros in cleats.....REED ALBERGOTTI
Put them together, and this long-limbed, fleet-a-foot foursome forms a formidable force. ....Clare Farnsworth referencing the best NFL secondary also known as the "Legion of Boom"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 1196
|
|
OK now I really do hate ESPN.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 2715
|
rainger wrote: jkitsune wrote: They have it wrong. First tiebreaker is head to head. Yup what he said Typical ESPN shit. I have grown to really dislike them over the last few years. Either you cant read or your trolling
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
therealjohncarlson wrote: rainger wrote: jkitsune wrote: They have it wrong. First tiebreaker is head to head. Yup what he said Typical ESPN shit. I have grown to really dislike them over the last few years. Either you cant read or your trolling huh?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1185
Location: Victoria BC
|
therealjohncarlson wrote: rainger wrote: jkitsune wrote: They have it wrong. First tiebreaker is head to head. Yup what he said Typical ESPN shit. I have grown to really dislike them over the last few years. Either you cant read or your trolling Trolling?  
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:11 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 2670
|
edogg23 wrote: rainger wrote: jkitsune wrote: They have it wrong. First tiebreaker is head to head. Yup what he said Typical ESPN shit. I have grown to really dislike them over the last few years. Or read the thread and realize ESPN is right. No dude.. the media hates Seattle and clearly the media is keeping them out of the playoffs 
_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1185
Location: Victoria BC
|
Hasselbeck wrote: [quote="edogg23Or read the thread and realize ESPN is right. :[/quote] Has nothing to do with your over generalization. My comment had nothing to do with media hate or over reaction. ESPN is now bigger in dollars than the NFL. They have become gods in their own mind. For those who actually look at their reporting and watching the trends of this organization they will see that ESPN is trying to tell the world what is what with everything to do with sport. You can have your man crush on them. All I said was I was I have really grown to dislike them. Why the hell am I not alowed my opinion and likes and dislikes without you telling me I am "WRONG"???
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl
Last edited by rainger on Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:32 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8172
Location: Antioch, CA
|
|
Always just check out NFL.com for things like this. They will have the right info on there.
Seahawks are #6 seed as of today.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
peachesenregalia
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:37 pm |
|
| * NET Starfish * |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 8771
Location: Vaes Dothrak
|
HawkFan72 wrote: Always just check out NFL.com for things like this. They will have the right info on there.
Seahawks are #6 seed as of today. Phew! Thank goodness for that. I was worried we were out of playoff contention there for a minute... Wait, I just remembered, this whole thread is completely pointless and the playoff standings right now are meaningless.
_________________
FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bellyfat
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:39 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:56 am
Posts: 337
|
|
I am just curious if ESPN will fix it not.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
peachesenregalia wrote: HawkFan72 wrote: Always just check out NFL.com for things like this. They will have the right info on there.
Seahawks are #6 seed as of today. Phew! Thank goodness for that. I was worried we were out of playoff contention there for a minute... Wait, I just remembered, this whole thread is completely pointless and the playoff standings right now are meaningless. Good point, I'd rather be 1-9 so we wouldn't have to deal with these stupid threads.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nategreat
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 942
|
peachesenregalia wrote: HawkFan72 wrote: Always just check out NFL.com for things like this. They will have the right info on there.
Seahawks are #6 seed as of today. Phew! Thank goodness for that. I was worried we were out of playoff contention there for a minute... Wait, I just remembered, this whole thread is completely pointless and the playoff standings right now are meaningless. We get it, you don't like this thread. In my opinion, though, it's good to keep a beat on playoff seeds, now that we are working our way into Week 12. It makes things much more interesting to keep track of at this point. True, it may not matter too much right now, as a lot can (and will) change before the end of Week 17. But I guarantee you will not simply ignore the next 5 weeks, and I challenge you to not take a look at the playoff picture until we finish our last game of the season against the Rams. Each week from here on out is important, and it's nice to know where we stand- even if it's not final. _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:55 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 6897
Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
nategreat wrote: peachesenregalia wrote: HawkFan72 wrote: Always just check out NFL.com for things like this. They will have the right info on there.
Seahawks are #6 seed as of today. Phew! Thank goodness for that. I was worried we were out of playoff contention there for a minute... Wait, I just remembered, this whole thread is completely pointless and the playoff standings right now are meaningless. We get it, you don't like this thread. In my opinion, though, it's good to keep a beat on playoff seeds, now that we are working our way into Week 12. It makes things much more interesting to keep track of at this point. True, it may not matter too much right now, as a lot can (and will) change before the end of Week 17. But I guarantee you will not simply ignore the next 5 weeks, and I challenge you to not take a look at the playoff picture until we finish our last game of the season against the Rams. Each week from here on out is important, and it's nice to know where we stand- even if it's not final. He was just joking. everyone got it except you. at least that will be the story. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:52 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1185
Location: Victoria BC
|
|
This from CBS sports:
Seattle and Tampa Bay are ahead of Minnesota based on head to head sweep (2-0). Seattle is ahead of Tampa Bay based on conference record (4-4 to the Buccaneers' 3-4).
Nuf said for all you ESPN junkies. Go look at ESPN's own made up system for grading QB's. (no, no one else especaily the NFL knew what was right, they needed to created their own system).
According to them Jake Locker is the 7th best QB in football and RW is only the 18th. GIVE ME A BREAk. You can make what ever stats you want to justifiy your opinion especially when they are as subjective as the opinions of the ESPN writers.
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:58 pm |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16271
Location: Bothell
|
|
ESPN still has our record at 5-5. And begrudgingly at that.
_________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
400WattHPSHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Why does ESPN say Minnesota is ahead of Seattle? Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 10:05 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 1:09 pm
Posts: 1233
Location: Central Washington
|
peachesenregalia wrote: HawkFan72 wrote: Always just check out NFL.com for things like this. They will have the right info on there.
Seahawks are #6 seed as of today. Phew! Thank goodness for that. I was worried we were out of playoff contention there for a minute... Wait, I just remembered, this whole thread is completely pointless and the playoff standings right now are meaningless. So did we ever make the playoffs or not? I got lost in here somehow.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thManNorth, AbsolutNET, anewby, Attyla the Hawk, BallHawker, bellingerga, bestfightstory, BirdsCommaAngry, CEHawk, CFraychineaud, Darrenv17, DavidSeven, Deixis, Digsbone, Evil_Shenanigans, FlyingGreg, FormerEvil, geoff21, godzillarad, Google [Bot], goseahawks2012, grizbob, gspin2k1, Gunner, HappyMonkey, HawkAroundTheClock, hawksfanohio, Hawkspur, hidn, jack_patera, JimZorn10, Jville, Leep, Lieutenant Dan, LyndseyG, Maelstrom787, McGruff, MichaelHawk70, NinerBuff, PrepntheSep, rainger, Recon_Hawk, red17hawk, sainthawk29, SDHawk, Seabean, SeatownJay, Shaz, SHOCKER315, silverjoel, six sigma, SmokinHawk, SPRC, Stoned Cold, T-Sizzle, TVHAWK, TwistedHusky, Yoonhawk and 244 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
