 |
| Author |
Message |
|
nIdahoSeahawk
|
Post subject: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch  Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:08 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 210
Location: Bremerton, WA
|
|
I've been watching the packers/lions game. It is kind of getting annoying listening to whoever the commentators are, since several times through the game they've mentioned the golden Tate touchdown. Each time STILL saying it was an interception. Especially after the pick-6 md Jennings just got, they went as far as to say it should be his second of the season. Seriously, they can't just drop it and move on?
_________________  If you're a PlayStation fan, check out and support my PlayStation forum: Team PlayStation
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Bigpumpkin
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:13 pm |
|
| *GOLD SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 4595
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
|
|
If you are a Green Bay "homer" you just aren't going to "let go".
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MrCarey
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:14 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm
Posts: 1665
|
|
They can't get over the fact that their favorite little bandwagon didn't get the call. Pretty annoying to listen to.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pstark3
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:08 pm
Posts: 1424
Location: Bellevue
|
|
Im glad im not the only one irritated by the hate we get for that. Guess its our fault somehow. But then why has SBXL always been such a "touchy subject" for most commentators?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Aros
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 12:40 pm |
|
| [[ .NET Godfather ]] |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
Posts: 7479
Location: Maple Valley, WA
|
|
The best way to combat all of the negative noise is to simply keep winning.
_________________  "We're about to be legendary." - Richard Sherman to the Seahawks sideline in the 3rd quarter of SBXLVIII
|
|
| |
|
|
|
VHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:20 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2011 9:44 am
Posts: 2524
Location: Naples, FL
|
|
Love to see the Pukers in the playoffs.
_________________
Wolf grey all day every day.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
oregonhawkfan
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:20 pm |
|
| *SILVER SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 1971
|
|
They made their bed w/ their getting the regular refs back, now then must lay in it. In other words, they came out so vocal about how "bad" a call it was they dare not reverse their position or they will be seen for what they were doing....lobbying.
_________________
Welcome to Mr. Wilson's Magic Show
Strong safety Kam Chancellor, a 6-foot-3, 232-pound rhinoceros in cleats.....REED ALBERGOTTI
Put them together, and this long-limbed, fleet-a-foot foursome forms a formidable force. ....Clare Farnsworth referencing the "Legion of Boom"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pinksheets
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:25 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm
Posts: 2810
Location: Seattle
|
|
And the Packers get a game winning TD after a horrible non-call PI by the Packers in the endzone. The broadcasters talked about it immediately after it happened, but not mentioned at all post-game as a turning point.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nIdahoSeahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:31 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:46 pm
Posts: 210
Location: Bremerton, WA
|
|
Bad ending to the game today... Maybe they'll shut it now?
_________________ If you're a PlayStation fan, check out and support my PlayStation forum: Team PlayStation
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Galen96
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:31 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1763
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
|
|
yeah, lions got robbed. I used to like the packers, but now I can't stand em.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
quadsas
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:32 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 12:34 pm
Posts: 93
|
|
They simply can't believe refs called that one right (it was a TD)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 3372
|
Hey OP you forgot the quotes around "catch" in your title 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nanomoz
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:50 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 4494
Location: UT
|
|
As their defense gets away with multiple non call PI's. joe buck can go buck himself.
_________________
“We need to be challenged, ... and we need to be under the gun to respond.” --Pete Carroll
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:02 pm |
|
| NET Ring Of Honor |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 20421
Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014
|
|
Turn off the sound.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
beasthawk
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:13 pm
Posts: 656
Location: Everett WA
|
If we go to play offs by one win, that game will go against us and we will be told that we don't deserve it.... I can see it all now 
_________________
Officially un-official.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rat
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:06 pm |
|
| * NET Cynic * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 3496
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
beasthawk wrote: If we go to play offs by one win, that game will go against us and we will be told that we don't deserve it.... I can see it all now I hope that one game is over the Vikings. The Hutch fiasco was a long time ago, but I'll still laugh at their tears.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 7778
|
|
Wasn't it Joe Buck?
Just satisfy yourself with the knowledge that even with his undoubtedly well paid job, he still can't find a product that doesn't scream, "Yes, I'm dying my hair brown."
Plus he looks like the even geekier younger brother of Egon from Ghostbusters.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:42 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 8715
Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
|
amazing how well that Packer D held the juggernaut lions offense after the Packer offense had given them the lead.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TheHawkDoc
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:47 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:46 am
Posts: 145
|
Tech Worlds wrote: amazing how well that Packer D held the juggernaut lions offense after the Packer offense had given them the lead. But didn't you know that the Lions are great on offense and unstoppable? Stafford is a modern day Montana! At least we got close! 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: Apparently the media still hates the Tate catch Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 6:32 pm |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9323
Location: Monroe, WA
|
I haven't gotten over it either. I still celebrate that win. 
_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.
SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 98pack_09hawks, Big D, Bill Assumpcao, BlueBlood, Blueboy, Bobblehead, buzzsaw, Claden, Coxal, djTOY2000, Dtowers, dutchman063, godzillarad, Goodwin Seahawk, Google [Bot], grizbob, Hawkfanadam, HawkMeat, HawKnPeppa, HawkRiderFan, HAWKS2theBONE, Hawksnutt12, Hawk_Nation, IcedHawk, Jeremy517, JimZorn10, JMR, Kooshster, lacenterhawk, MagHawk, ManBunts, Marlin Man, Missing_Clink, onanygivensunday, Onyx, rightbench, RobBaker7714409, RockHawk, ryan419_2002, Seahawk Mike, seahawks08, Seahawks1983, seahawksfan28, SeahawksFanForever, SeatownJay, SHOCKER315, SonicHawk, Spleenhawk2.0, SPOHAWK, tacomahawk, tdlabrie, TDOTSEAHAWK, Team Slapaho, thecycle, TheTruth, tleise32, Trenchbroom, TwilightError, Uncle Si, Wizofwest, Yxes1122, YYZHawksFan and 268 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
