beasthawk wrote:If we go to play offs by one win, that game will go against us and we will be told that we don't deserve it.... I can see it all now
Tech Worlds wrote:amazing how well that Packer D held the juggernaut lions offense after the Packer offense had given them the lead.
sutz wrote:I haven't gotten over it either.
I still celebrate that win.
VHawk wrote:Youu dont "get it" because you are an entitled Puker fan.
Bipolar wrote:VHawk wrote:Youu dont "get it" because you are an entitled Puker fan.
how am I an entitled Packer fan and what should I be "getting"?
regardless of where you stand on that subject, if anyone should be blasted, is a replacement ref.
how exactly a bad call all the sudden transformed to hate of Green Bay Packers franchise is beyond my comprehention.
it was a bad call. every team gets bad calls few times a season. there is no international conspiracy against Seattle. Packers fans do not hate Seahawks fans. move on with your life.
PS: you dont even know me.
Bipolar wrote:VHawk wrote:Youu dont "get it" because you are an entitled Puker fan.
how am I an entitled Packer fan and what should I be "getting"?
regardless of where you stand on that subject, if anyone should be blasted, is a replacement ref.
how exactly a bad call all the sudden transformed to hate of Green Bay Packers franchise is beyond my comprehention.
it was a bad call. every team gets bad calls few times a season. there is no international conspiracy against Seattle. Packers fans do not hate Seahawks fans. move on with your life.
PS: you dont even know me.
CANHawk wrote:The problem my brotha (and you are my brotha cuz I know you're a Hawks fan - "entitled Puker fan" was probably a bit much) is that you keep referring to it as a bad call. It was perhaps one of the only truly good calls in that entire game.
Like I do every time this subject comes up, I'm just going to leave this here and walk away humming "we are the champions" to myself...
Bipolar wrote:CANHawk wrote:The problem my brotha (and you are my brotha cuz I know you're a Hawks fan - "entitled Puker fan" was probably a bit much) is that you keep referring to it as a bad call. It was perhaps one of the only truly good calls in that entire game.
Like I do every time this subject comes up, I'm just going to leave this here and walk away humming "we are the champions" to myself...
thats fine. no hard feelings.
that said, its all human psychology. the brain creates all sorts of defense mechanisms and rationalizes events in a way so that they make sense to you.
for example - you didn't get that job after 3 rounds of interview, and then you calm yourself down by thinking that "oh well, it wasn't meant to be, the manager would have probably sucked anyway, and there are bigger and better things waiting for me in the future", where in fact you truly are just trying to cope with reality that you didn't get the job of your dreams.
same thing here -- there is a video footage from all angles and to virtually any unbiased observer the TD call was extremely bogus. but no, to us, Seahawks fans (who clearly have vested interest), we come up with all sorts of reasons and logic why this was in a TD.
Bipolar wrote:CANHawk wrote:The problem my brotha (and you are my brotha cuz I know you're a Hawks fan - "entitled Puker fan" was probably a bit much) is that you keep referring to it as a bad call. It was perhaps one of the only truly good calls in that entire game.
Like I do every time this subject comes up, I'm just going to leave this here and walk away humming "we are the champions" to myself...
thats fine. no hard feelings.
that said, its all human psychology. the brain creates all sorts of defense mechanisms and rationalizes events in a way so that they make sense to you.
for example - you didn't get that job after 3 rounds of interview, and then you calm yourself down by thinking that "oh well, it wasn't meant to be, the manager would have probably sucked anyway, and there are bigger and better things waiting for me in the future", where in fact you truly are just trying to cope with reality that you didn't get the job of your dreams.
same thing here -- there is a video footage from all angles and to virtually any unbiased observer the TD call was extremely bogus. but no, to us, Seahawks fans (who clearly have vested interest), we come up with all sorts of reasons and logic why this was in a TD.
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
Bipolar wrote:CANHawk wrote:The problem my brotha (and you are my brotha cuz I know you're a Hawks fan - "entitled Puker fan" was probably a bit much) is that you keep referring to it as a bad call. It was perhaps one of the only truly good calls in that entire game.
Like I do every time this subject comes up, I'm just going to leave this here and walk away humming "we are the champions" to myself...
thats fine. no hard feelings.
that said, its all human psychology. the brain creates all sorts of defense mechanisms and rationalizes events in a way so that they make sense to you.
for example - you didn't get that job after 3 rounds of interview, and then you calm yourself down by thinking that "oh well, it wasn't meant to be, the manager would have probably sucked anyway, and there are bigger and better things waiting for me in the future", where in fact you truly are just trying to cope with reality that you didn't get the job of your dreams.
same thing here -- there is a video footage from all angles and to virtually any unbiased observer the TD call was extremely bogus. but no, to us, Seahawks fans (who clearly have vested interest), we come up with all sorts of reasons and logic why this was in a TD.
NYCoug wrote:It's never going to go away.
Thank God people's attention spans are much shorter nowadays. I don't think I could put up with talking about that play for the next 60 years, telling people where I was when it happened haha... Give it 5 years and the only time you'll see it referenced is when the Seahawks play the Packers head to head. Wouldn't that be something if this was only the beginning of the two teams intertwining fates? Multiple heated playoff matchups later, people would point back to the MNF Game as the start of all the history.
Funny, when we asked Ham what he saw from that seat on his helmet at the 50, No. 59 says, “I
anticipated a flag being thrown.”
Because …
“You can’t touch the ball twice.”
Really
hawker84 wrote:well unfortunatley for you and the rest of packer nation, it wasn't a bogus call to the referee's on the field, nor was it a bogus call when league officials later reviewed it at the NFL headquarters.... what it looks like a bogus call to you, is the complete right call to leaugue officials, even the real official in the replay booth..
according to the rules , it was a touchdown, boo hoo, get over it, moving along now...
take this wine and cheese act to the packer boards....
XxxZagnutxxX wrote:CANHawks picture says a thousand words but we only need one: Touchdown!
Bipolar, you can also use your psycobabble rationalization and reverse it to justify the Packer loss.
You can't just overlook Tate having the ball with two feet down, because the play ended AT THAT MOMENT.
I'm also in theto GB group but only because of the Packer fan here at work that hasn't paid up his 1/2 case of beer bet..... Stealers, Cowpukes and Whiners still top my list though.
CANHawk wrote:Two hands on ball? Check.
I'm also in the to GB group but only because of the Packer fan here at work that hasn't paid up his 1/2 case of beer bet.....
VHawk wrote:We have to hear Sterling Sharpe,Lindsay Rhodes,Joe Buck,Herman Edwards and numerous other pundits continually bring this play up and discredit and now we have a Packer/Seahawk fan trying to convince us we should move on when that play is thrown in our face on a regular basis.Maybe if you and the rest of the media can move on we can as well.
is the best you can do, then fine, it was a TDCold Hard Football Facts’ Comeback King
It is currently Fri Apr 20, 2018 7:13 am
Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]