Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:51 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:26 pm
Posts: 330
Can somebody please enlighten me on why Bevell runs empty backfield passing plays on 3rd and short?

I've seen him do this several times this season, including today. I think it was 3rd and 2 to go, and he had them set up as empty backfield...it didn't work. I'm not saying he has to run run run on all 3rd and short, but it seems that having a hammer like Lynch in the backfield would keep the defense on their toes for a run, even if it is a passing play.

I must be missing something...
:17:


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:00 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:50 pm
Posts: 344
I have been wondering this for 3 years or so Check that 10 years lol IDK but neither does no one else


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:03 pm 
* NET Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am
Posts: 3883
I think it is in hopes that the defense will be lined up stacking the box leaving a serious mismatch on a WR/TE. That's how I always saw it. I've seen it work pretty well. If the defense is lined up in a nickel and leaves space in the middle then the QB can read it and just do a step back and draw right up the middle for the first down. It's not a bad idea when it is executed properly or you guess right.

_________________
Image
R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten
1/12/39 - 8/7/08


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:07 am 
NET Practice Squad
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 12:14 am
Posts: 81
Location: Lake Taupo, NZ
Don't get me wrong, Lynch as he is known is a 'Beast' but it's not a gimme that he'll get those 3rd and shorts. He's been stopped probably just as much as those empty backfield plays don't work (maybe not 100% accurate) but I agree on keeping him in as a decoy.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:21 am 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:01 pm
Posts: 330
Is there an issue with Wilson doing 5-7 step drop backs at all? All his passing seems to come from the gun? I think that if we line him up under center and fake the hand off to lynch it opens the passing up more so than the fake hand off from the gun


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:10 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:30 pm
Posts: 1765
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
he does plenty of play-action.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:08 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 8:19 am
Posts: 720
I'm assuming maybe Bevell thinks that if a receiver doesn't get open that Wilson's athleticism can pick up the first down since it's short yardage.

_________________
Status: Active lieutenant in the 12th Man Army


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:38 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:15 pm
Posts: 607
I used to think the same way, but now I seem to find a few reasons.

1. Our OL is not ready to handle the pressure in the middle and the opposing defense gets penetration. If you advertise run and the opposing defense gets penetration, the play is pretty much dead unless you crowd the middle. The chances are low to make it.
2. In short yardage situations, the idea is to keep the ball as close to the line of scrimmage after being snapped so that yards to make up is lesser. If you go back and hand it over, Marshawn has to make up more room to make the necessary yardage.
3. Being a young team, situations like these where you have to make a play is too high a pressure on the OL, any play calling to reduce the pressure on the OL works better.
4. When you spread the offense, the opposing defense has not now scheme for a QB sneak or a quick slant, so the interior pressure will be way reduced compared to everyone crowding in the middle.
5. It also helps with bringing in an extra receiver or TE who can help with blocking or catching the ball.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Why run empty backfield on 3rd and short???
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:30 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 902
Location: Everett, Wa
12thMan1 wrote:
I'm assuming maybe Bevell thinks that if a receiver doesn't get open that Wilson's athleticism can pick up the first down since it's short yardage.


This sounds about right.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chevelle03, ChrisB Bacon, dbmack, Google [Bot], hawksfansinceday1, JOz56, KARAVARUS, Majestic-12 [Bot], Meeker, Tune and 84 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.