| Author |
Message |
|
EastCoastHawksFan
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!  Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:10 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:15 pm
Posts: 571
|
|
BRUUUUUUUCE , him and clemons provided good pressure throughout this game
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:11 pm |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 7476
Location: Monroe, WA
|
|
After we re-signed Clem, we knew that Irvin would be a situational pass rusher and not much else this year.
He's doing pretty good at that role. He's supposed to be the LEO of the future IIRC, but with Clem healthy and going strong, Bruce has time to work his way into being an every down player.
_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Atradees
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:19 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
Posts: 1994
Location: South of Heaven
|
|
I don't know. It seams to me that we get abused so badly on third downs is because Red is on the sidelines and Bruce is
in the game. Why couldn't we have red in the game and have Bruce rush from more of a linebacker position?
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:36 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8145
Location: Pasco, WA
|
Atradees wrote: I don't know. It seams to me that we get abused so badly on third downs is because Red is on the sidelines and Bruce is
in the game. Why couldn't we have red in the game and have Bruce rush from more of a linebacker position? We usually do, Red is usually in their with Jones as the rushing DT's, with Bruce and Clem as the rushing ends. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Atradees
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:41 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
Posts: 1994
Location: South of Heaven
|
|
I could be wrong. I was thinking red is jogging off the field alot on third downs. I am gonna have to watch the game again. There is also alot of Branch and McDonald sightings. It looked to me like Bruce was the DE in the third down package much like Brock used to be.
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TDOTSEAHAWK
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:11 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 2605
Location: Hamilton
|
|
I still wish we took Coples.
_________________ Beast Mode...try BORG MODE Driver of the PC/JS Bandwagon since 2010
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Bipolar
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:04 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 724
Location: Minneapolis, MN (moving to Seattle in March 2013)
|
Couples has absolutely disgusting branding on both shoulders. what the fudge was that idiot thinking? that meaty chunky skin overgrowth looks rediculous, like a pair of balls or something... 
_________________
Cheesehead Seahawk Extraordinaire
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:26 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
TDOTSEAHAWK wrote: I still wish we took Coples. If you're happy with Coples, then I guess you'd also be happy with him getting absolutely no pass rush in this scheme, no?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
