| Author |
Message |
|
MLOhawks
|
Post subject: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:29 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:35 pm Posts: 2611 Location: Seattle, WA - USA
|
|
It seems like we either throw it 2 yards or 20 when 5-10 would be perfect for RW. Why are we running so many long developing deep routes? Where the heck are the check downs and slants, dump offs, etc? Wilson may not get sacked as much if he had some intermediate outlet to check down to.
_________________ "Are we rockin' and rollin' or what?!''
-- Seattle coach Pete Carroll, celebrating with his coaches after the Seahawks pulled off a trade with the Jets, netting running back Leon Washington on Saturday, via Seahawks.com
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Reaneypark
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:37 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 2:43 pm Posts: 107
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
AbsolutNET
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:41 pm |
|
| * NET X's & O's Guru * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am Posts: 6782 Location: PNW
|
Reaneypark wrote: Did you watch the game? Do you have anything of substance to add? If not, please just refrain from responding.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Tical21
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:49 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:37 pm Posts: 487
|
|
Wilson was confused all day. He couldn't tell who was rushing and who was going to drop back into the underneath zones. He did find Miller on a good number of underneath plays. It's really hard to find the underneath stuff when the opposing defense has 8 in the box all game and is making sure they take the underneath stuff away, which is what Wilson has seen almost all season long. That is why the over-the-top stuff is there more often than it is for other teams. Couple that with having RB's that aren't great threats out of the backfield, and having a #1 WR that thrives more down the field than he does on shorter routes, and this is kinda what you get. Bevell prefers to call screens to Tate when he thinks the underneath stuff will be more open, which I'm fine with, because the screens are becoming more and more effective. If Wilson keeps making big plays down the field, the underneath stuff will open up in due time.
_________________ Ummm, no sig to see here, especially not a sig referring to Tarvaris Jackson in any way.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:54 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am Posts: 6320 Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
I would like to see more screen passes to Lynch. When it's called it works well. Just doesn't seem to be called very often.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:56 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am Posts: 3415
|
|
I think they used a lot of intermediate passes to Miller and Rice along the sidelines. Keep in mind Wilson only threw about 20 passes all game.
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
TDOTSEAHAWK
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:16 pm Posts: 2605 Location: Hamilton
|
|
Marshawn Lynch is running fine this year. Short to intermediate passing games are for saps who can't run the ball.
_________________ Beast Mode...try BORG MODE Driver of the PC/JS Bandwagon since 2010
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:08 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am Posts: 3415
|
TDOTSEAHAWK wrote: Marshawn Lynch is running fine this year. Short to intermediate passing games are for saps who can't run the ball. Sounds like exactly all Matt Flynn did in the pre-season. He was a checkdown machine. Makes me wonder how many different things Pete was referring to when he said that Russell did "everything we asked him to do." Sounds like he wasn't only talking about Russell....
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:54 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am Posts: 7229
|
|
It wasn't there today, but hey, whatever works. Seattle was money in the red zone and Wilson finished with nearly 10 yards per attempt.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:56 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am Posts: 9697
|
|
It was there, but it was more there last week. I sense Wilson was looking for more deep options today than he was last week and it might have cost him a few early short throws. All's well that ends well, though.
_________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
kearly wrote: It wasn't there today, but hey, whatever works. Seattle was money in the red zone and Wilson finished with nearly 10 yards per attempt. Actually I'm pretty sure all of Doug Baldwin's 3 catches were intermediate.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SmokinHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Where is our short-intermediate passing game? Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:29 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am Posts: 4742 Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
|
Reaneypark wrote: Did you watch the game? rofl. Classic. While it may be frustrating to watch three and out after three and out, seeing Russell Wilson uncork 40+ yard TD bombs makes it all worthwhile.
_________________ Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro
He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: Chrome_Seahawk, City Of Reign, dbmack, DeSeahawk, Google [Bot], goseahawks2012, HAWK-N-ROLL, HighlandHawk, jp25591, kaygojinghi, KCHawkGirl, misfit, sam1313, SoulfishHawk and 76 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |