| Author |
Message |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Bruuuuuuuuce!!  Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:01 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2 ... h-week-10/Quote:
How this contest unfolds could depend on what kind of offensive packages the New York Jets use. For instance, the San Francisco 49ers didn’t want Irvin on the field and only ran three wide receiver sets on 13.3% of offensive plays. The end result? Irvin was only on the field for 12 snaps, picking up one sack and nothing else.
The Seahawk has had an indifferent rookie year but has done a solid job of generating consistent pressure, leading to him having the third-highest Pass Rushing Productivity score of all 4-3 defensive ends. With that in mind, the Jets may want to use less than the 46.4% of three wide receiver sets they’ve used in their last three games. Otherwise, Austin Howard — owner of our fourth-lowest pass blocking grade of all right tackles (and third lowest in Pass Blocking Efficiency) — might be in for a long day.
Beatdown Probability – The game situation will dictate. If the Jets fall behind it’s going to be near impossible to stop Irvin from getting at Howard.
This stuff just warms my heart. BRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCEE!
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Pstark3
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:13 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:08 pm
Posts: 1307
Location: Bellevue
|
|
Id love for to chant Bruuuuuuuuuuce 3 or 4 times today
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:19 am |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 7444
Location: Monroe, WA
|
What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season? He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games? Sounds pretty decent to me. 
_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rainger
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:27 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1185
Location: Victoria BC
|
sutz wrote: What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season? He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games? Sounds pretty decent to me. I think it is 5 but still good considering the number of snaps
_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson + Jesse Williams = Superbowl
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:04 am |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 7444
Location: Monroe, WA
|
rainger wrote: sutz wrote: What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season? He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games? Sounds pretty decent to me. I think it is 5 but still good considering the number of snaps Since our best pass rusher has had 11 sacks in 16 games the past two seasons, 5 after 9 game is a pretty good pace IMHO. 
_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TJH
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:51 am |
|
| *NET #1 Sherman Fan* |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:14 pm
Posts: 234
|
sutz wrote: What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season? He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games? Sounds pretty decent to me. While true, hes been destroyed on runs and has very few tackles.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
EastCoastHawksFan
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:19 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:15 pm
Posts: 569
|
|
Him and Clemons have both vanished IMHO , hopefully they wake up today.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
scutterhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 2086
|
TJH wrote: sutz wrote: What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season? He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games? Sounds pretty decent to me. While true, hes been destroyed on runs and has very few tackles. Destroyed??? You have to consider the time he's on the field,,You can't make many tackles from the side lines dude
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TJH
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:30 pm |
|
| *NET #1 Sherman Fan* |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:14 pm
Posts: 234
|
scutterhawk wrote: TJH wrote: sutz wrote: What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season? He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games? Sounds pretty decent to me. While true, hes been destroyed on runs and has very few tackles. Destroyed??? You have to consider the time he's on the field,,You can't make many tackles from the side lines dude Wow, really enlightening. Just watch him during run plays. It has nothing to do with being on the sidelines.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawKnPeppa
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 1208
|
|
He needs to hit the weights during the off season. I'd love to see him get stronger at the point of attack so he can be on the field more.
_________________
"A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail" (Cboom, 2012)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BigMeach
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:13 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 am
Posts: 249
|
|
I'm sure they'll have him add 15 pounds of muscle to his frame. But you gotta admit, 7 sacks on the season now is pretty damn good. Tied for first on the team with Clem.
_________________
"Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." - Sun Tzu
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1284
|
EastCoastHawksFan wrote: Him and Clemons have both vanished IMHO , hopefully they wake up today. They have only disappeared if you're only focused on sacks. Pressure is just as important.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:52 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am
Posts: 3415
|
|
Bruce is MANNNNNNNNN!
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawkmanj
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:57 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:50 am
Posts: 293
|
|
He's gotten a good batch of sacks thus far.
He may no be an every down player, but if he can come up big on sacks, it's filling a need.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8139
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
I'll take the couple of sacks he got for us today.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8139
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
Also have to point out that Quinton Coples, who many wanted with our pick, has done next to nothing so far this year and has played much more regularly than our boy Bruce who has almost 4 times as many sacks as Coples (7 vs 2).
_________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:36 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4861
|
Blitzer88 wrote: Also have to point out that Quinton Coples, who many wanted with our pick, has done next to nothing so far this year and has played much more regularly than our boy Bruce who has almost 4 times as many sacks as Coples (7 vs 2). I was a Coples fan but I think Pete could have otivated him. Quinton has all the physical talent in the world, he just doesn't apply himself. _________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
ivotuk wrote: Blitzer88 wrote: Also have to point out that Quinton Coples, who many wanted with our pick, has done next to nothing so far this year and has played much more regularly than our boy Bruce who has almost 4 times as many sacks as Coples (7 vs 2). I was a Coples fan but I think Pete could have otivated him. Quinton has all the physical talent in the world, he just doesn't apply himself. No way, Quinton Coples has that nasty tattoo. And Irvin's a boss in this defense.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1284
|
hawksfan515 wrote: ivotuk wrote: Blitzer88 wrote: Also have to point out that Quinton Coples, who many wanted with our pick, has done next to nothing so far this year and has played much more regularly than our boy Bruce who has almost 4 times as many sacks as Coples (7 vs 2). I was a Coples fan but I think Pete could have otivated him. Quinton has all the physical talent in the world, he just doesn't apply himself. No way, Quinton Coples has that nasty tattoo. And Irvin's a boss in this defense. It's a brand. Hot iron on skin.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkAroundTheClock
|
Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!! Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 776
Location: Olympia
|
|
Irvin is coming along beautifully and doing what has been asked of him. Does he have more to offer? Yes. Can he improve? Yes. Was he an upgrade to what we had before? Hell to the YES. Hopefully he continus to evolve his game, as many of our other rookies have done, and he becomes that every-down guy. But as it is, I see no grounds for complaints regarding Bruce Irvin.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: Canhawks, Check down, City Of Reign, cvcahawk, debevemos, FearTheBeak, FidelisHawk, Google [Bot], H4WKSF4N, hawksfanohio, HighlandHawk, homerun1970, hugecanoli, kjreid, Mandu, talic7, Uberman, WillySchu and 77 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
