Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:01 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5209
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2 ... h-week-10/

Quote:

How this contest unfolds could depend on what kind of offensive packages the New York Jets use. For instance, the San Francisco 49ers didn’t want Irvin on the field and only ran three wide receiver sets on 13.3% of offensive plays. The end result? Irvin was only on the field for 12 snaps, picking up one sack and nothing else.

The Seahawk has had an indifferent rookie year but has done a solid job of generating consistent pressure, leading to him having the third-highest Pass Rushing Productivity score of all 4-3 defensive ends. With that in mind, the Jets may want to use less than the 46.4% of three wide receiver sets they’ve used in their last three games. Otherwise, Austin Howard — owner of our fourth-lowest pass blocking grade of all right tackles (and third lowest in Pass Blocking Efficiency) — might be in for a long day.

Beatdown Probability – The game situation will dictate. If the Jets fall behind it’s going to be near impossible to stop Irvin from getting at Howard.


This stuff just warms my heart. BRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCEE!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:13 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 7:08 pm
Posts: 1424
Location: Bellevue
Id love for to chant Bruuuuuuuuuuce 3 or 4 times today


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:19 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9561
Location: Monroe, WA
What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season?

He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games?

Sounds pretty decent to me.

:)

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.

SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:27 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 1453
Location: Victoria BC
sutz wrote:
What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season?

He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games?

Sounds pretty decent to me.

:)

I think it is 5 but still good considering the number of snaps

_________________
Seahawks + PC/JS + Russell Wilson = Superbowl XLVIII +


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:04 am 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9561
Location: Monroe, WA
rainger wrote:
sutz wrote:
What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season?

He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games?

Sounds pretty decent to me.

:)

I think it is 5 but still good considering the number of snaps

Since our best pass rusher has had 11 sacks in 16 games the past two seasons, 5 after 9 game is a pretty good pace IMHO.

:229031_shrug:

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.

SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:51 am 
*NET #1 Sherman Fan*
Online

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:14 pm
Posts: 641
sutz wrote:
What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season?

He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games?

Sounds pretty decent to me.

:)



While true, hes been destroyed on runs and has very few tackles.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:19 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:15 pm
Posts: 771
Him and Clemons have both vanished IMHO , hopefully they wake up today.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:18 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 3187
TJH wrote:
sutz wrote:
What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season?

He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games?

Sounds pretty decent to me.

:)


While true, hes been destroyed on runs and has very few tackles.


Destroyed??? You have to consider the time he's on the field,,You can't make many tackles from the side lines dude


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:30 pm 
*NET #1 Sherman Fan*
Online

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:14 pm
Posts: 641
scutterhawk wrote:
TJH wrote:
sutz wrote:
What the hell is an 'indifferent' rookie season?

He has, what 6 or 7 sacks so far after 9 games?

Sounds pretty decent to me.

:)


While true, hes been destroyed on runs and has very few tackles.


Destroyed??? You have to consider the time he's on the field,,You can't make many tackles from the side lines dude


Wow, really enlightening. Just watch him during run plays. It has nothing to do with being on the sidelines.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:59 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 2362
He needs to hit the weights during the off season. I'd love to see him get stronger at the point of attack so he can be on the field more.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:13 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 am
Posts: 341
I'm sure they'll have him add 15 pounds of muscle to his frame. But you gotta admit, 7 sacks on the season now is pretty damn good. Tied for first on the team with Clem.

_________________
"Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." - Sun Tzu


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:48 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2748
EastCoastHawksFan wrote:
Him and Clemons have both vanished IMHO , hopefully they wake up today.


They have only disappeared if you're only focused on sacks. Pressure is just as important.

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:52 pm 
* NET Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am
Posts: 3883
Bruce is MANNNNNNNNN!

_________________
Image
R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten
1/12/39 - 8/7/08


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:57 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:50 am
Posts: 299
He's gotten a good batch of sacks thus far.

He may no be an every down player, but if he can come up big on sacks, it's filling a need.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:28 pm 
* NET Eeyore *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10541
Location: Pasco, WA
I'll take the couple of sacks he got for us today.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 5:56 pm 
* NET Eeyore *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10541
Location: Pasco, WA
Also have to point out that Quinton Coples, who many wanted with our pick, has done next to nothing so far this year and has played much more regularly than our boy Bruce who has almost 4 times as many sacks as Coples (7 vs 2).

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:36 pm 
* NET Nobody *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 7613
Blitzer88 wrote:
Also have to point out that Quinton Coples, who many wanted with our pick, has done next to nothing so far this year and has played much more regularly than our boy Bruce who has almost 4 times as many sacks as Coples (7 vs 2).


I was a Coples fan but I think Pete could have otivated him. Quinton has all the physical talent in the world, he just doesn't apply himself.

_________________
"God Bless the Seattle Seahawks" Cortez Kennedy


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:09 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5209
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
ivotuk wrote:
Blitzer88 wrote:
Also have to point out that Quinton Coples, who many wanted with our pick, has done next to nothing so far this year and has played much more regularly than our boy Bruce who has almost 4 times as many sacks as Coples (7 vs 2).


I was a Coples fan but I think Pete could have otivated him. Quinton has all the physical talent in the world, he just doesn't apply himself.


No way, Quinton Coples has that nasty tattoo. And Irvin's a boss in this defense.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:28 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2748
hawksfan515 wrote:
ivotuk wrote:
Blitzer88 wrote:
Also have to point out that Quinton Coples, who many wanted with our pick, has done next to nothing so far this year and has played much more regularly than our boy Bruce who has almost 4 times as many sacks as Coples (7 vs 2).


I was a Coples fan but I think Pete could have otivated him. Quinton has all the physical talent in the world, he just doesn't apply himself.


No way, Quinton Coples has that nasty tattoo. And Irvin's a boss in this defense.


It's a brand. Hot iron on skin.

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:08 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 1300
Location: Olympia
Irvin is coming along beautifully and doing what has been asked of him. Does he have more to offer? Yes. Can he improve? Yes. Was he an upgrade to what we had before? Hell to the YES. Hopefully he continus to evolve his game, as many of our other rookies have done, and he becomes that every-down guy. But as it is, I see no grounds for complaints regarding Bruce Irvin.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:10 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 7:15 pm
Posts: 771
BRUUUUUUUCE , him and clemons provided good pressure throughout this game


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:11 pm 
USMC 1970-77
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9561
Location: Monroe, WA
After we re-signed Clem, we knew that Irvin would be a situational pass rusher and not much else this year.

He's doing pretty good at that role. He's supposed to be the LEO of the future IIRC, but with Clem healthy and going strong, Bruce has time to work his way into being an every down player.

_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.

SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:19 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
Posts: 2506
Location: South of Heaven
I don't know. It seams to me that we get abused so badly on third downs is because Red is on the sidelines and Bruce is
in the game. Why couldn't we have red in the game and have Bruce rush from more of a linebacker position?

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:36 pm 
* NET Eeyore *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10541
Location: Pasco, WA
Atradees wrote:
I don't know. It seams to me that we get abused so badly on third downs is because Red is on the sidelines and Bruce is
in the game. Why couldn't we have red in the game and have Bruce rush from more of a linebacker position?


We usually do, Red is usually in their with Jones as the rushing DT's, with Bruce and Clem as the rushing ends.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 9:41 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
Posts: 2506
Location: South of Heaven
I could be wrong. I was thinking red is jogging off the field alot on third downs. I am gonna have to watch the game again. There is also alot of Branch and McDonald sightings. It looked to me like Bruce was the DE in the third down package much like Brock used to be.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:11 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:16 pm
Posts: 2914
Location: Hamilton
I still wish we took Coples.

_________________
Driver of the PC/JS Super Bowl wagon since 2010
Image
Sherman looks like a ballet master in grand jeté –
a trash-talking, dreadlocked Baryshnikov suspended
impossibly above the turf – pro football's paean to
wanton human destruction slips into the sublime.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:04 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 749
Location: Bellevue
Couples has absolutely disgusting branding on both shoulders. what the fudge was that idiot thinking?
that meaty chunky skin overgrowth looks rediculous, like a pair of balls or something...

Image

_________________
Cheesehead Seahawk Extraordinaire


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Bruuuuuuuuce!!
 Post Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:26 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Online

Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5209
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
TDOTSEAHAWK wrote:
I still wish we took Coples.


If you're happy with Coples, then I guess you'd also be happy with him getting absolutely no pass rush in this scheme, no?


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 12HawkFan, AgentDib, Bigbadhawk, Bitter, Blitzer88, blue 22, bytor72, CHawks4L, Chrome_Seahawk, CitrusHawk, cnjvh, DavidSeven, Dietrich, drdiags, DrDix, drrew, DynoHawk, fishingfanatic, Geologic, Google [Bot], gowazzu02, grizbob, hai, HawkFan72, HawkHouse, Hawknballs, HawkRiderFan, hawksfan515, Hawk_Nation, Hollywood_and_Vine, jammerhawk, jdblack, jdemps, Jville, JZ#1, Kaiser, kearly, KK84, Largent80, Lords of Scythia, McGruff, Mojambo, MPLogick, Natethegreat, NC State Seahawk, NoTurnUnstoned, onanygivensunday, OrFan, Polk738, ratso, razgriz737, RedAlice, rj503, RockHawk, SalishHawkFan, Seahawkfan80, Seahawks4life, seahawksny, SeatownJay, Sgt. Largent, SilkMonkey, smoothmaw, Snakeeyes007, SoulfishHawk, Storts, suppaball, Terpdragon, the ditch, Throwdown, TJH, TorontoHawk, TwilightError, UGotHawked, Veilside, vin.couve12, VivaEfrenHerrera, warden, WillySchu, Yahoo [Bot], YaktownHawK, Zebulon Dak and 245 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.