 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4  Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5203
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/ ... hlisbergerQuote: The first chart shows the five highest-rated red zone quarterbacks from Week 4 through Week 9, measured by Total QBR. Wilson trails only Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers and Drew Brees. Peyton Manning is fifth. All five have scores in the 90s (100 is maximum). The rest of the league is at 37.3. That is goood company. It is so great to have red zone struggles resolved (even if only temporarily). Let's all just be glad he's not in the company of the QB's in the second chart (Sanchez only ranks second to worst to John Skelton in the red zone).
|
|
  |
|
|
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4 Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 1794
|
|
can anyone explain to me why Ryan Tannehill has a 4-11 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs and John Skelton has a 5-10 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs, but Tannehill has a better QBR??
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4 Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:53 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5203
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
themunn wrote: can anyone explain to me why Ryan Tannehill has a 4-11 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs and John Skelton has a 5-10 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs, but Tannehill has a better QBR?? Watch the tape. That is something that is required to determine QBR. It's entirely likely that Tannehill had a few passes dropped in the endzone that weren't his fault, like RW's pass to Braylon week 1 in AZ.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4 Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:01 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 1794
|
hawksfan515 wrote: themunn wrote: can anyone explain to me why Ryan Tannehill has a 4-11 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs and John Skelton has a 5-10 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs, but Tannehill has a better QBR?? Watch the tape. That is something that is required to determine QBR. It's entirely likely that Tannehill had a few passes dropped in the endzone that weren't his fault, like RW's pass to Braylon week 1 in AZ. Oh I see, do they take points off for a poor throw that the WR has had to adjust to, even if it goes for a TD? Do they award anything for a hail mary pass which is essentially just a heave and hope? I prefer the purely statistical approach
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4 Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:05 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5203
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
themunn wrote: hawksfan515 wrote: themunn wrote: can anyone explain to me why Ryan Tannehill has a 4-11 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs and John Skelton has a 5-10 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs, but Tannehill has a better QBR?? Watch the tape. That is something that is required to determine QBR. It's entirely likely that Tannehill had a few passes dropped in the endzone that weren't his fault, like RW's pass to Braylon week 1 in AZ. Oh I see, do they take points off for a poor throw that the WR has had to adjust to, even if it goes for a TD? Do they award anything for a hail mary pass which is essentially just a heave and hope? I prefer the purely statistical approach Yes, and no. I don't really like the purely statistical approach due to the fact that a QB can chuck a screen that goes for 90 yards and a TD, really boosting his QB rating, but not his QBR. Then, another QB can go in and throw a perfect pass to a WR in the endzone, and the WR can bobble it and the ball will get intercepted, and while their QB rating drastically suffers, QBR mostly gives them the credit for the TD pass, putting the blame on the WR instead.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4 Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 7:13 am |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 8633
Location: Monroe, WA
|
|
One problem with football is there are insufficient games/reps to get really good stats like you get in baseball. And, it being one of the ultimate team sports, one player's stats are often highly contingent on some other player/s doing their job right.
I kind of like the added subjectivity of the new QBR.
_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4 Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:20 am |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 10149
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
themunn wrote: can anyone explain to me why Ryan Tannehill has a 4-11 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs and John Skelton has a 5-10 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs, but Tannehill has a better QBR?? I'm thinking it has something to do with the fact that QBR is a bunch of hokum. _________________ Dr. Seuss wrote: From there to here, from here to there, EARL THOMAS is everywhere... #FREEBROWNER
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4 Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:27 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 7135
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
I also find it awesome that two of the three Wilson trails have lost to the Seahawks this season.
_________________ @SeahawkGreg "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" -- 13thMan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Wilson balls in the redzone, Sanchez doesn't since week 4 Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:36 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5203
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
CANHawk wrote: themunn wrote: can anyone explain to me why Ryan Tannehill has a 4-11 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs and John Skelton has a 5-10 completion ratio with 1 TD to 0 INTs, but Tannehill has a better QBR?? I'm thinking it has something to do with the fact that QBR is a bunch of hokum. C'mon CAN, your better than that. Why is it bad? I honestly think it's a big step up from QB rating. They actually have to study film for this stuff, that automatically makes it better than most everything. I thought you guys liked film breakdowns? This is essentially a film breakdown in form of a number rating.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 9 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: 2JZ2NV-9ER, 509hawk, 671hawk, AbsolutNET, Ad Hawk, ak3000, Alexander, Animalman, ARhawk, Aros, Axx, badronald, BAllenHawk, beehawk46, Bigpumpkin, BiloxiHawk, BioDawg03, Bitter, Blitzer88, Brass-Knuckles, brettb3, CalboHawk, CandlestickBum, CANHawk, chawx, cnjvh, Crabhawk, cvcahawk, DangerousDoug, davidonmi, DavidSeven, decaff907, dontbelikethat, dopeboy206, dradee, el capitan, ensett, formido, GeekHawk, Getup anddance, GFang, gonzhawk, Google [Bot], Hawkboi, HawksRawk, Hawk_Nation, hotroute101, hoxrox, hwkfan4life, IBleedBlueAndGreen, IcedHawk, idahohawk, indyhawk1984, jasehawk, Jazzhawk, JerHawk81, jonesy7748, JOz56, jsmc, Justwin, kamikazehawk, KARAVARUS, keatonisballin, Kixkahn, Largent80, largenutz, lvnginhwktwn, LymonHawk, McGruff, MichaelHawk70, Mick063, MidwestHawker, Missing_Clink, mistaowen, misTer, MontanaHawk05, Mr.Hawkbrah, Mtjhoyas, Nog, NorCal, nsport, Pandion Haliaetus, plyka, PrepntheSep, QUILCENE, RezHawk, rlkats, RobBaker7714409, RolandDeschain, run and shoot, SalishHawkFan, salukihawk12, Seafan, seahawk2k, seahawksflow, seattlest7, SeeHawkRun, SilNWest, Skortch, Slick, slipwax, SoCalHawk, SoCalHawksFan, soje, Sports Hernia, Starrman44, strohmin, sutz, TalonX, The Outfield, TheHawkster, therealjohncarlson, Throwdown, UGotHawked, UNLV Rebel Hawk, VancitySeahawk, Veilside, volsunghawk, WCstripes, Zorn76, ZorntoLargent and 401 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
