| Author |
Message |
|
Hawkadeus
|
Post subject: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:24 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 201
|
|
Lane has really stood out to me the past month or so on special teams. Especially on punts. He seems to always be the first guy to the ball, often making a play on it near the endzone. Seeing him blossom on st's is very helpful given the loss of Ben Obomanu. And likely a reason for the team being able to cut Charly Martin. Nice job, Lane!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
T-Sizzle
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am Posts: 1087
|
|
Im really curious to see how well he would play the nickel corner....not sure why he isnt given the chance there... Trufant is horrible.
_________________ "??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk "16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle "OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?"  -ivotuk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawksFTW
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:29 pm |
|
| * NET E-Knight * |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 10:06 am Posts: 3523
|
T-Sizzle wrote: Im really curious to see how well he would play the nickel corner....not sure why he isnt given the chance there... Trufant is horrible. Trufant played well versus Minny. He has had off games, and is definitely the weak link in the secondary, but how many teams have a shut down nickel DB? Until WT3 proves he can stay healthy, I think Trufant has that spot locked down for the rest of the season.
_________________ cboom wrote: Wilson is the worst QB I have seen as a Hawks fan. And I have been around long enough to see them all.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hawkadeus
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:32 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 201
|
T-Sizzle wrote: Im really curious to see how well he would play the nickel corner....not sure why he isnt given the chance there... Trufant is horrible. Lane is a rookie late round draft pick out of a very small school. He isn't anywhere near being ready to take over that much responsibility. Let's not fall for Charlie Whitehurst "let's try anybody simply because maybe he's better than the guy we think is a bum" disease. Trufant isn't great anymore. It's why he's a #3 now. But the hate he gets around here is silly.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:33 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm Posts: 9966 Location: King In The North
|
|
He's looked great on punt coverage as of late.
_________________  Tanzania¹²
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am Posts: 1284
|
Hawkadeus wrote: T-Sizzle wrote: Im really curious to see how well he would play the nickel corner....not sure why he isnt given the chance there... Trufant is horrible. Lane is a rookie late round draft pick out of a very small school. He isn't anywhere near being ready to take over that much responsibility. Let's not fall for Charlie Whitehurst "let's try anybody simply because maybe he's better than the guy we think is a bum" disease. Trufant isn't great anymore. It's why he's a #3 now. But the hate he gets around here is silly. It's the same attitude that wanted Brian Banks starting at LB or thinking Portis was better than TJack.
_________________ Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Jville
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:42 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:49 pm Posts: 1866
|
|
Jeremy Lane is so fast. He has had an impact on special teams. Allowed them to place Obomanu on IR and has brought flexibility to special teams.
Huge potential upside but arrived very raw and needs time to develop. As a primary backup for Brandon Browner, its amussing to see the contrasting size of Browner and Lane interacting on the side line.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 4:47 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am Posts: 2750
|
|
Wait...charly Martin was cut?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:38 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am Posts: 3414
|
T-Sizzle wrote: Im really curious to see how well he would play the nickel corner....not sure why he isnt given the chance there... Trufant is horrible. How many catches and TD's did Harvin have against Trufant last week?
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jkitsune
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:41 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm Posts: 1501
|
SharkHawk wrote: T-Sizzle wrote: Im really curious to see how well he would play the nickel corner....not sure why he isnt given the chance there... Trufant is horrible. How many catches and TD's did Harvin have against Trufant last week? I see what you did there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:51 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am Posts: 3414
|
|
Asked a question? Yes I did. Please respond. You like to challenge me it seems. I'm challenging you. Post some facts so we can determine how "horrible" Trufant is. If you're going to make that kind of statement, I think being challenged to provide statistical proof isn't out of line.
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jkitsune
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:57 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm Posts: 1501
|
|
Relax, it was a joke that clearly doesn't translate over text, acknowledging the tongue-in-cheek nature of your question.
I agree with you. No challenge here.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Coug_Hawk08
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:26 am Posts: 2250
|
SharkHawk wrote: Asked a question? Yes I did. Please respond. You like to challenge me it seems. I'm challenging you. Post some facts so we can determine how "horrible" Trufant is. If you're going to make that kind of statement, I think being challenged to provide statistical proof isn't out of line. Not every retort is a challenge. . . who thinks like that? Is this the wild west or seahawks forum? lulz. Either way, you are right (simmer down ego). Trufant played well last game. According to PFF: "He gave up a penalty, but after that Marcus Trufant allowed only three of four passes into his coverage, for 9 yards." Completion rate was crap, and its hard to say if those were 1st down receptions (i dont remember) but 9 yards is pretty meager.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:35 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am Posts: 3414
|
Coug_Hawk08 wrote: SharkHawk wrote: Asked a question? Yes I did. Please respond. You like to challenge me it seems. I'm challenging you. Post some facts so we can determine how "horrible" Trufant is. If you're going to make that kind of statement, I think being challenged to provide statistical proof isn't out of line. Not every retort is a challenge. . . who thinks like that? Is this the wild west or seahawks forum? lulz. Either way, you are right (simmer down ego). Trufant played well last game. According to PFF: "He gave up a penalty, but after that Marcus Trufant allowed only three of four passes into his coverage, for 9 yards." Completion rate was crap, and its hard to say if those were 1st down receptions (i dont remember) but 9 yards is pretty meager. Meh.... I've just been getting it from him for a week. So I decided to strike back since he set the pins up so nicely.
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawks4thewin
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:23 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:42 pm Posts: 403
|
I think of trufant as a let them catch the ball and be there to tackle them kinda corner.... I think sherman and browner are more of NOpe you aint catching that and if you do feel this kinda corners. Im not sure which style is better for a nickel corner........ BUT thurmond did beat out sherman AND trufant.. for the starting job last year, lest you forget 
_________________ --/*Seattle Seahawks*\--
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jkitsune
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm Posts: 1501
|
SharkHawk wrote: Coug_Hawk08 wrote: SharkHawk wrote: Asked a question? Yes I did. Please respond. You like to challenge me it seems. I'm challenging you. Post some facts so we can determine how "horrible" Trufant is. If you're going to make that kind of statement, I think being challenged to provide statistical proof isn't out of line. Not every retort is a challenge. . . who thinks like that? Is this the wild west or seahawks forum? lulz. Either way, you are right (simmer down ego). Trufant played well last game. According to PFF: "He gave up a penalty, but after that Marcus Trufant allowed only three of four passes into his coverage, for 9 yards." Completion rate was crap, and its hard to say if those were 1st down receptions (i dont remember) but 9 yards is pretty meager. Meh.... I've just been getting it from him for a week. So I decided to strike back since he set the pins up so nicely. Have you? I didn't think we've been disagreeing much recently. And I wasn't disagreeing with you here. Didn't mean any upset.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
BWRyan
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 9:32 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:35 am Posts: 371
|
|
Plus, Trufant DID strip the ball from Harvin and recover it, in what was probably a very crucial takeaway early in the game.
Tru is in the twilight of his career for sure. But he's fine as a nickel corner. That said, getting Lane a few reps couldn't' hurt.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
suppaball
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 10:53 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:17 pm Posts: 2415 Location: Oroville CA.
|
|
I like what Tru does for us he is good at his job. Besides WT3 is back Lane wont see the field anytime soon.
_________________ "Tracy Porter lost his manhood when Marshawn stiff armed him" some dude on youtube.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Navyhawkfan187
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:17 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am Posts: 504
|
hawks4thewin wrote: .... BUT thurmond did beat out sherman AND trufant.. for the starting job last year, lest you forget  No, he didn't. He beat out Sherman for the primary backup. Browner and Trufant were the week 1 starting CBs, Trufant got hurt, Thurmond went in. Thurmond got hurt and we go to bask in the glory that is Richard Sherman.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Happypuppy
|
Post subject: Re: Jeremy Lane on Special Teams Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 12:56 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm Posts: 1042
|
|
Trufant is covering the flanker most of the time when he does come in. This is new for him I suspect and is a lot of zone. He was always better at Man Coverage.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 907Hawk, @cro, AVL, bestfightstory, bloodkingg, CarkosEnFuego, dbmack, DSM, Grahamkrackker253, GreenHawk, grizbob, JimZorn10, JKent82, JSeahawks, lacenterhawk, Maelstrom787, NinerLifer, oldhawkfan, Onyx, peachesenregalia, RolandDeschain, ruffENrowdy, seafence82, SeahawkFrost, seattlest7, SHOCKER315, storm74, Storts, sutz, tacomahawk, thecycle, themunn, vin.couve12, Wenhawk, Wiseguy, Zer0veritas and 130 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |