 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
hawkfan68
|
Post subject: Bevell's use of Tate  Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:56 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
Posts: 3247
Location: Sammamish, WA
|
|
The one thing that befuddles me about Bevell is his inability to use Golden Tate's athleticism more. Similar to what Minnesota does with Percy Harvin. Of all the receivers on the team, I think Tate is the closest to that. I believe Tate can be really good in that role. Maybe not Percy Harvin good but still pretty good. We've seen glimpses of it but not on a consistent level. Coming from a system, Minnesota, that has effectively used that type of player it's odd that he's not using that here. Just an observation.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:59 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 7398
Location: CVN-68
|
|
He's trying to with the bubble screens. They did a smart thing with those yesterday - first in making them very quick throws to allow Tate to get into space, and second running the same play back to back but on different sides as the Vikings stayed in the same defense.
Bevell seems to have figured out that the long/wide throw is an accident waiting to happen. The quick pop to Tate in the slot is much more effective.
_________________ @SeahawkGreg "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" -- 13thMan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 5887
|
hawkfan68 wrote: The one thing that befuddles me about Bevell is his inability to use Golden Tate's athleticism more. Similar to what Minnesota does with Percy Harvin. Of all the receivers on the team, I think Tate is the closest to that. I believe Tate can be really good in that role. Maybe not Percy Harvin good but still pretty good. We've seen glimpses of it but not on a consistent level. Coming from a system, Minnesota, that has effectively used that type of player it's odd that he's not using that here. Just an observation. Well the last game saw signs of things to come with him using Tate the right way. Screens to Tate with Rice blocking worked out much better than how it was previously done. Hopefully we'll see much more of that because Tate is very dangerous in the open field.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:04 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2270
|
|
It's not all on Bevell. The past two years Tate has been the most inconsistent WR, both with his route running, and drops. Add in a rookie QB, conservative play calling for the first half of the season and offensive line just now beginning to pass block consistently = Tate not reaching his full potential.
Like I said, yesterday Bevell called a GREAT game............and there's no reason to think that a wider open passing game with Tate more involved won't continue.
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:10 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 2633
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: It's not all on Bevell. The past two years Tate has been the most inconsistent WR, both with his route running, and drops. Add in a rookie QB, conservative play calling for the first half of the season and offensive line just now beginning to pass block consistently = Tate not reaching his full potential.
Like I said, yesterday Bevell called a GREAT game............and there's no reason to think that a wider open passing game with Tate more involved won't continue. You're correct in route running, but i think you would be surprised with how many drops he actually recorded in 2011.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SalishHawkFan
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm
Posts: 4165
|
|
One of those screens was a backwards pass that the Hawks all just stood there looking at as it rolled out of bounds while the Minnesota DB dashed towards it trying to scoop it up and go for six. Tate has to have his head screwed on when that happens and go get that ball. Tate has to not place himself behind Wilson forcing the Qb to make a backwards pass.
_________________
Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.
R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TheHawkDoc
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:21 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 6:46 am
Posts: 145
|
Basis4day wrote: Sgt. Largent wrote: It's not all on Bevell. The past two years Tate has been the most inconsistent WR, both with his route running, and drops. Add in a rookie QB, conservative play calling for the first half of the season and offensive line just now beginning to pass block consistently = Tate not reaching his full potential.
Like I said, yesterday Bevell called a GREAT game............and there's no reason to think that a wider open passing game with Tate more involved won't continue. You're correct in route running, but i think you would be surprised with how many drops he actually recorded in 2011. Agreed. He had 0 drops in 2011. He had one bad game this year in terms of drops (at San Francisco), so I'm not sure that dinging him for drops is warranted.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Happypuppy
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:40 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm
Posts: 1812
|
|
He has great hands. He is getting to be a decent #2. That said I'd still look to a WR or TE high in our next draft
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Starrman44
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 2:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 802
Location: Canby, OR
|
SalishHawkFan wrote: One of those screens was a backwards pass that the Hawks all just stood there looking at as it rolled out of bounds while the Minnesota DB dashed towards it trying to scoop it up and go for six. Tate has to have his head screwed on when that happens and go get that ball. Tate has to not place himself behind Wilson forcing the Qb to make a backwards pass.  it's just so hard to stay in front of him when you got a midget QB taking midget steps backwards  
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkAroundTheClock
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 1270
Location: Olympia
|
FlyingGreg wrote: He's trying to with the bubble screens. They did a smart thing with those yesterday - first in making them very quick throws to allow Tate to get into space, and second running the same play back to back but on different sides as the Vikings stayed in the same defense.
Bevell seems to have figured out that the long/wide throw is an accident waiting to happen. The quick pop to Tate in the slot is much more effective. Yeah, in his presser just now (3:20ish) Pete addressed why some of those passes are working better and it has to do with our budding franchise quarterback. Pete said some of those quick throws are actually designed run/pass plays. Russell comes out of the huddle, sees the defensive setup, and makes the call as they approach the line whether to continue with the called run, or switch to the quick slot screen. Same formation, nothing changes except Wilson hands it off or he plants his foot, turns and throws. So as Russell is 1) getting more thoroughly into the playbook, and 2) being able to read defenses and adjust the play in the moment, those plays are working and adding dimensions to what our offense can do. _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Bipolar
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:51 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 749
Location: Bellevue
|
I find it quite ironic how we go from bashing Golden Tate for his wild inconsistency to blaming offensive coaching staff for not featuring him enough in the passing game. there is a reason why Bevell is an NFL coach and we aren't. he probably knows better  .
_________________
Cheesehead Seahawk Extraordinaire
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:52 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 7398
Location: CVN-68
|
Bipolar wrote: I find it quite ironic how we go from bashing Golden Tate for his wild inconsistency to blaming offensive coaching staff for not featuring him enough in the passing game. there is a reason why Bevell is an NFL coach and we aren't. he probably knows better . It almost sounds like this is an internet based fan forum chock full of diverging personalities/opinions and wildly inconsistent reactions! Oh wait...  P.S. Your screen name perfectly describes us. _________________ @SeahawkGreg"I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" -- 13thMan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 10:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 2925
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
SalishHawkFan wrote: One of those screens was a backwards pass that the Hawks all just stood there looking at as it rolled out of bounds while the Minnesota DB dashed towards it trying to scoop it up and go for six. Tate has to have his head screwed on when that happens and go get that ball. Tate has to not place himself behind Wilson forcing the Qb to make a backwards pass. That was the third ladderal of the game counting the Rice play. They were all thrown the same way - I think it was the play call. Don't like it but think it was. With that said 100% agree I was pissed that nobody went after the ball as it bounced out of bounds...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
suppaball
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 11:29 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:17 pm
Posts: 2580
Location: Oroville CA.
|
Starrman44 wrote: SalishHawkFan wrote: One of those screens was a backwards pass that the Hawks all just stood there looking at as it rolled out of bounds while the Minnesota DB dashed towards it trying to scoop it up and go for six. Tate has to have his head screwed on when that happens and go get that ball. Tate has to not place himself behind Wilson forcing the Qb to make a backwards pass. it's just so hard to stay in front of him when you got a midget QB taking midget steps backwards LOL thats some funny shit right there man! _________________  "Tracy Porter lost his manhood when Marshawn stiff armed him" some dude on youtube.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dunceface
|
Post subject: Re: Bevell's use of Tate Posted: Tue Nov 06, 2012 1:39 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 2924
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: It's not all on Bevell. The past two years Tate has been the most inconsistent WR, both with his route running, and drops. Add in a rookie QB, conservative play calling for the first half of the season and offensive line just now beginning to pass block consistently = Tate not reaching his full potential.
Like I said, yesterday Bevell called a GREAT game............and there's no reason to think that a wider open passing game with Tate more involved won't continue. +1 Concur and Tate has even admitted he feels like he now understands more of what he needs to be an NFL receiver Now that he is more effective he is being used more and looking more comfortable like the natural athlete with a knack for amazing plays that we saw at Notre Dame _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: 45Hawker, 86Hawk, ak3000, Aros, balko56, BamKam, Barthawk, bellingerga, Bigbadhawk, Bill Assumpcao, Bitter, Brahn, bytor72, CalboHawk, CEHawk, ChiefHawk, chihawk, Deterrence, Digsbone, dontbelikethat, drcool, drdiags, endzorn, Escamillo, EverydayImRusselin, FDNYHAWK, FearTheBeak, flyingHigh, fridayfrenzy, GoldenTater81, Google [Bot], grizbob, gtcotcakya, HawkFan72, Hawkfish, HawkHouse, HawkKnight, HAWKS2theBONE, Hawksfan76, hoxrox, Hustle_Wilson, hyrailyn, ImTheScientist, ivotuk, Jadow, jammerhawk, Jdm675, Jeremy517, JimZorn10, jkitsune, Kansashawkfan, kf3339, KiwiHawk, Kixkahn, kobebryant, LegionHawk12, longsh0t, Lords of Scythia, LymonHawk, M2MG, Marlin Man, marymoorhawk, mistaowen, nepahawk, Norn Iron man, NorthwestSportsFan, NoTurnUnstoned, nwgamer, nyc-seahawk, OLYhawks, Painhawk, Pandion Haliaetus, piston bully, raisethe3, RolandDeschain, ScottishSeahawk, seahawk 17, Seahawkfan80, SeahawksMSHing, Seanhawk, Seaswab, seeg, six sigma, smoothmaw, SnowMan, soohawk, suppaball, the ditch, TheGreenMan, Tivopaul, tleise32, Tokadub, tooshort, TruHammer07, UK_Seahawk, Veilside, WilsonLegend, zack803 and 351 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
