 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD  Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:13 pm |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16275
Location: Bothell
|
Hawk Strap wrote: Seahawk Sailor wrote: Hawk Strap wrote: Said the same thing, Shark.
They spent less time reviewing Petersons non-TD Well, in their defense, Peterson's "TD" was clearly going to be a score on the next play, whether it was a touchdown or not, whereas Tate's play provided a clear possibility to overturn a Tate touchdown. Sailor, I love ya, but that reasoning sucks My "reasoning" was satire directed at the league's history of screwing the Seahawks over. Sorry if it went whistling by your head. _________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:22 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16444
Location: SoCal
|
JSeahawks wrote: Largent80 wrote: To all The frakstix lambasting Tate for the last game....Suck IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The fact that he was really good today doesnt change the fact that he was horrible last week. He deserved the heckles last week just as much as he deserves the props today. Ummmm...ok...whatever dood. And did you see countless drops by all the other "recievers" before that? Friggin Kearse gets hit in the hands with an easy catch, drops it and is seen laughing?...where is the hate for that pile of camel dung?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawken-Dazs
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:32 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:50 pm
Posts: 407
|
|
I think they reviewed the touchdown for statistical reasons. If Tate did fumble, then he wouldn't get credit for the touchdown. At least, that's how I saw it.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkAroundTheClock
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
Posts: 780
Location: Olympia
|
|
So anyway, this guy named "GOLDEN" caught a ball, ran, and then FLEW above this guy for a touchdown! And he got smashed by another guy in mid-air. It was awesome. You totally shoulda been there. Or at least stopped arguing and taking everything personally like a little girl whose pony was stolen so you could enjoy the fact that a Seahawks receiver made a fantastic friggin' play.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Claden
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:27 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:18 pm
Posts: 221
|
Nice  I agree, GIF GIF GIF!!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawKnPeppa
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:36 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 1208
|
SharkHawk wrote: How could you overturn a Tate TD? The ball even if fumbled went forward and was covered by a Hawk. So there's nothing to review even. ... and he had more than one hand on the ball UNCONTESTED ;-)
_________________
"A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail" (Cboom, 2012)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
gargantual
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:17 am
Posts: 602
Location: Lewiston, CA (but Seattle native :)
|
|
Uhhh actually, he DOES have just one hand on the ball. But noone else does, so moot point.
Just sayin.........
_________________  "John Schneider is...half ninja assassin, half shark. This man does not screw around...So glad he is our GM." - PGunning101
|
|
| |
|
|
|
oregonhawkfan
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:43 pm |
|
| *SILVER SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:08 pm
Posts: 1636
|
|
I love and hate how willing GT is to totally sell out his body for a play. The man has NO FEAR making for spectacular plays but I am always holding my breath that he is going to get terminally hurt. ***knocking on wood***
_________________
Strong safety Kam Chancellor, a 6-foot-3, 232-pound rhinoceros in cleats.....REED ALBERGOTTI
Put them together, and this long-limbed, fleet-a-foot foursome forms a formidable force. ....Clare Farnsworth referencing the best NFL secondary also known as the "Legion of Boom"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jammerhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:49 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:13 pm
Posts: 1373
|
AbsolutNET wrote:
Doesn't every score get reviewed?
Apparently not FG's kicked about 4 seconds after the play clock expired on the play. That BS non-call by the back judge qualified as an epic fail. In the end the Hawks really beat Minnie by an extra 3 points as that FG should not have counted. The correctly called penalty would have taken them out of FG range.
_________________
Until we develop a pass rush that will cause opposing teams to be forced to scheme to defend it we will never be able to completely take the final step. Until the OLine is strengthened the team will remain weak.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dunceface
|
Post subject: Re: Tate's 2nd TD Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:26 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 1913
|
jammerhawk wrote: AbsolutNET wrote:
Doesn't every score get reviewed?
Apparently not FG's kicked about 4 seconds after the play clock expired on the play. That BS non-call by the back judge qualified as an epic fail. In the end the Hawks really beat Minnie by an extra 3 points as that FG should not have counted. The correctly called penalty would have taken them out of FG range. yeah you could see Farwell yelling w his hands up waaaaay before the snap if we would have lost by 3 or less i would have to fly to that back judge's house and destroy all of his earthly belongings _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, 671hawk, AVL, Basis4day, Biggiec76, BirdsCommaAngry, BlueThunder, bobincovington, ChrisB Bacon, Clayfighter, cvcahawk, dbmack, Digsbone, dumbrabbit, Floridahawk79, freakshow, gargantual, Google [Bot], grizbob, Gunslinger, HAWKS2theBONE, Hawks46, HollywoodHawk, HopScotch, IBleedBlueAndGreen, jammerhawk, Jville, kthebestwayw, Mandu, nsport, Paschtorian, PrepntheSep, RobBaker7714409, RolandDeschain, SacHawk2.0, Scottemojo, StaffAmerica74, stev32e, SwissSeahawk, tacomahawk, Terpdragon, TheHawkster, Uffda, WilsonMVP, Wiseguy and 150 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
