I can't get enough of it!!!!
http://www.seahawks.com/videos-photos/v ... 860a4d7149
Tate's 2nd TD
30 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:22 pm
-
3elieve-
Throwdown - * NET Baller *
- Posts: 18785
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
- Location: Graham, WA
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:23 pm
-
GIF! GIF! GIF!
-
hawksfan515 - NET Veteran
- Posts: 5211
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
- Location: Battle Ground, Washington
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:26 pm
-
Gif Gif Gif!
That was pretty awesome.-
JKent82 - NET Veteran
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:13 pm
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:43 pm
-
Why were they reviewing it? Our guy recovered it in the endzone anyway, which = TD. I swear Jerome Bogar is Bill Leavy, but just incompetent, not a blatant cheater.
R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten
1/12/39 - 8/7/08-
SharkHawk - * NET Alumni *
- Posts: 3883
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:44 pm
-
Said the same thing, Shark.
They spent less time reviewing Petersons non-TD"it'd be a newborn deer" - pehawk-
Hawk Strap - * Handsome *
- Posts: 2938
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:37 pm
- Location: Tri Cities, WA
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:47 pm
-
Hawk Strap wrote:Said the same thing, Shark.
They spent less time reviewing Petersons non-TD
Well, in their defense, Peterson's "TD" was clearly going to be a score on the next play, whether it was a touchdown or not, whereas Tate's play provided a clear possibility to overturn a Tate touchdown.World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.-
Seahawk Sailor - * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
- Posts: 18153
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
- Location: The beautiful PNW
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:50 pm
-
How could you overturn a Tate TD? The ball even if fumbled went forward and was covered by a Hawk. So there's nothing to review even.
R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten
1/12/39 - 8/7/08-
SharkHawk - * NET Alumni *
- Posts: 3883
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:52 pm
-
Seahawk Sailor wrote:Hawk Strap wrote:Said the same thing, Shark.
They spent less time reviewing Petersons non-TD
Well, in their defense, Peterson's "TD" was clearly going to be a score on the next play, whether it was a touchdown or not, whereas Tate's play provided a clear possibility to overturn a Tate touchdown.
Sailor, I love ya, but that reasoning sucks"it'd be a newborn deer" - pehawk-
Hawk Strap - * Handsome *
- Posts: 2938
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:37 pm
- Location: Tri Cities, WA
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:52 pm
-
-
MontanaHawk05 - * 17Power Blogger *
- Posts: 11233
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:53 pm
-
LMAO Montana.
- hawk45
- *GOLD SUPPORTER*
- Posts: 4687
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:54 pm
-
To all The frakstix lambasting Tate for the last game....Suck IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Largent80 - NET Ring Of Honor
- Posts: 22106
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
- Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:54 pm
-
SharkHawk wrote:Why were they reviewing it? Our guy recovered it in the endzone anyway, which = TD. I swear Jerome Bogar is Bill Leavy, but just incompetent, not a blatant cheater.
Doesn't every score get reviewed?
-
AbsolutNET - * NET X's & O's Guru *
- Posts: 8687
- Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
- Location: PNW
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:56 pm
-
Largent80 wrote:To all The frakstix lambasting Tate for the last game....Suck IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The fact that he was really good today doesnt change the fact that he was horrible last week. He deserved the heckles last week just as much as he deserves the props today.
-
JSeahawks - * NET Moderator *
- Posts: 18498
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
- Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:57 pm
-
JSeahawks wrote:Largent80 wrote:To all The frakstix lambasting Tate for the last game....Suck IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The fact that he was really good today doesnt change the fact that he was horrible last week. He deserved the heckles last week just as much as he deserves the props today.
Umm he had a pretty good game last game?? Leading receiver???-
hawksfan515 - NET Veteran
- Posts: 5211
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
- Location: Battle Ground, Washington
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:57 pm
-
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
This is my new avatar. Thank you.-
hawksfan515 - NET Veteran
- Posts: 5211
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
- Location: Battle Ground, Washington
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:59 pm
-
Of course a few microseconds later the picture would show him getting his face knocked off but that makes the above picture no less awesome.
- hawk45
- *GOLD SUPPORTER*
- Posts: 4687
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:26 pm
-
Solid outing by Tate today. Though sometimes his inconstancy is mind boggling, I love how he giths for the ball and fights for every yard.
- hawkmanj
- NET Starter
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 09, 2010 10:50 am
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:47 pm
-
He's a terror in the open field, for sure. I love how he makes guys miss, and can take some serious hits and pop right back up.
- Hawks46
- NET Veteran
- Posts: 3339
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 7:49 pm
-
AbsolutNET wrote:SharkHawk wrote:Why were they reviewing it? Our guy recovered it in the endzone anyway, which = TD. I swear Jerome Bogar is Bill Leavy, but just incompetent, not a blatant cheater.
Doesn't every score get reviewed?
Correct. All scoring plays are automatically reviewed. Dunno why people are grumpy about it.-
MissoulaHawkFan - NET Rookie
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:05 am
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:10 pm
-
Tate gets so much hate its unbelievable. Five other players could have a game just as bad as him yet people on here will blast him way more
-
therealjohncarlson - NET Veteran
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:13 pm
-
Hawk Strap wrote:Seahawk Sailor wrote:Hawk Strap wrote:Said the same thing, Shark.
They spent less time reviewing Petersons non-TD
Well, in their defense, Peterson's "TD" was clearly going to be a score on the next play, whether it was a touchdown or not, whereas Tate's play provided a clear possibility to overturn a Tate touchdown.
Sailor, I love ya, but that reasoning sucks
My "reasoning" was satire directed at the league's history of screwing the Seahawks over. Sorry if it went whistling by your head.World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.-
Seahawk Sailor - * .NET Navy Bad Ass *
- Posts: 18153
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
- Location: The beautiful PNW
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:22 pm
-
JSeahawks wrote:Largent80 wrote:To all The frakstix lambasting Tate for the last game....Suck IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The fact that he was really good today doesnt change the fact that he was horrible last week. He deserved the heckles last week just as much as he deserves the props today.
Ummmm...ok...whatever dood. And did you see countless drops by all the other "recievers" before that?
Friggin Kearse gets hit in the hands with an easy catch, drops it and is seen laughing?...where is the hate for that pile of camel dung?-
Largent80 - NET Ring Of Honor
- Posts: 22106
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
- Location: NFL WORLD CHAMPIONS 2013-2014
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 8:32 pm
-
I think they reviewed the touchdown for statistical reasons. If Tate did fumble, then he wouldn't get credit for the touchdown. At least, that's how I saw it.
"I'm not the type to let a sleeping giant lie. I wake up the giant, slap him around, make him mad and beat him to the ground. I talk a big game because I carry a big stick." --- All-Pro Stanford Graduate-
Hawken-Dazs - NET Veteran
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:50 pm
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:08 pm
-
So anyway, this guy named "GOLDEN" caught a ball, ran, and then FLEW above this guy for a touchdown! And he got smashed by another guy in mid-air. It was awesome. You totally shoulda been there. Or at least stopped arguing and taking everything personally like a little girl whose pony was stolen so you could enjoy the fact that a Seahawks receiver made a fantastic friggin' play.
-
HawkAroundTheClock - NET Veteran
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:30 pm
- Location: Olympia
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:27 pm
-
Nice
I agree, GIF GIF GIF!!-
Claden - NET Rookie
- Posts: 295
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:18 pm
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 9:36 pm
-
SharkHawk wrote:How could you overturn a Tate TD? The ball even if fumbled went forward and was covered by a Hawk. So there's nothing to review even.
... and he had more than one hand on the ball UNCONTESTED ;-)-
HawKnPeppa - NET Veteran
- Posts: 2510
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:21 pm
-
Uhhh actually, he DOES have just one hand on the ball. But noone else does, so moot point.
Just sayin.........
"John Schneider is...half ninja assassin, half shark. This
man does not screw around...So glad he is our GM."
- PGunning101-
gargantual - NET Veteran
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:17 am
- Location: Lewiston, CA (but Seattle native :)
-
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:43 pm
-
I love and hate how willing GT is to totally sell out his body for a play. The man has NO FEAR making for spectacular plays but I am always holding my breath that he is going to get terminally hurt. ***knocking on wood***Welcome to Mr. Wilson's Magic Show
Strong safety Kam Chancellor, a 6-foot-3, 232-pound rhinoceros in cleats.....REED ALBERGOTTI
Put them together, and this long-limbed, fleet-a-foot foursome forms a formidable force. ....Clare Farnsworth referencing the "Legion of Boom"- oregonhawkfan
- *SILVER SUPPORTER*
- Posts: 2016
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:08 pm
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Mon Nov 05, 2012 3:49 am
-
AbsolutNET wrote:
Doesn't every score get reviewed?
Apparently not FG's kicked about 4 seconds after the play clock expired on the play.
That BS non-call by the back judge qualified as an epic fail. In the end the Hawks really beat Minnie by an extra 3 points as that FG should not have counted. The correctly called penalty would have taken them out of FG range.Until we develop a pass rush that will cause opposing teams to be forced to scheme to defend it we will never be able to completely take the final step. That was done and the final step was taken.
Super Bowl XLVIII Champions at last after 38 seasons.
What a special magical year!- jammerhawk
- NET Veteran
- Posts: 1791
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:13 pm
Re: Tate's 2nd TD
Mon Nov 05, 2012 4:26 am
-
jammerhawk wrote:AbsolutNET wrote:
Doesn't every score get reviewed?
Apparently not FG's kicked about 4 seconds after the play clock expired on the play.
That BS non-call by the back judge qualified as an epic fail. In the end the Hawks really beat Minnie by an extra 3 points as that FG should not have counted. The correctly called penalty would have taken them out of FG range.
yeah you could see Farwell yelling w his hands up waaaaay before the snap
if we would have lost by 3 or less i would have to fly to that back judge's house and destroy all of his earthly belongings
-
dunceface - NET Veteran
- Posts: 3209
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
-
30 posts
• Page 1 of 1
It is currently Fri Jul 25, 2014 8:04 am
Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]
Information
-
- Who is online
- Users browsing this forum: AsylumGuido, Ballz, bigDhawk, Blueboy, canfan, CHawks4L, daveman918, dbsn2420, Donn2390, drdevin, edogg23, endzorn, EntiatHawk, EverydayImRusselin, Fanatics, getnasty, Google [Bot], Green13, gtcotcakya, HawkinNY, Hobzen, ImTheScientist, jammerhawk, jdruaint, JGfromtheNW, McGruff, meadhawks, Missing_Clink, Popeyejones, razor150, RockHawk, Sarlacc83, Seahawks1983, Sgt. Largent, shawnsim, Smoke, Spleenhawk2.0, TheGreenMan, Throwdown, Trenchbroom, Uncle Si, v1rotv2 and 133 guests