 |
| Author |
Message |
|
kmedic
|
Post subject: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am Posts: 1134 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
is not as good as SF's. Is that a blasphemous statement?
Maybe, but all the hype has gotten into these guys's heads IMO. I'm watching a superb disciplined hard hitting performance being displayed by the SF secondary on Arizona tonight. Absolutely rock solid. Yes, it's Arizona, and Fitz is out, but they have completely shut down not only their passing game but their running game as well in their house.
I think the "Legion of Boom" needs to get their crap together and start playing with a chip on their shoulder, starting this Sunday. They got a lot of proving to do again in my eyes. Can someone wake up Kam for us please?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:46 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm Posts: 5194 Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
kmedic wrote: is not as good as SF's. Is that a blasphemous statement?
Maybe, but all the hype has gotten into these guys's heads IMO. I'm watching a superb disciplined hard hitting performance being displayed by the SF secondary on Arizona tonight. Absolutely rock solid. Yes, it's Arizona, and Fitz is out, but they have completely shut down not only their passing game but their running game as well in their house.
I think the "Legion of Boom" needs to get their crap together and start playing with a chip on their shoulder, starting this Sunday. They got a lot of proving to do again in my eyes. Can someone wake up Kam for us please? All I'm gonna say is.... There's a slight difference in talent level. 1: I assume the 49ers are creating tons of pressure on that sieve the Cardinals call an O-line, affecting the passes 2: If Fitz is out, that is one of the worst WR corps in the league. Yes, worse than ours. 3: They are playing against John freaking Skelton. 4: SF's offense helped them make Arizona one-dimensional early. I think a lot of teams in the league would look good if they had this going for them.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
suppaball
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:50 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:17 pm Posts: 2417 Location: Oroville CA.
|
|
If the Legion of Boom are the compeditors I think they are this game woke them up. They will get beter out of pride alone. The WR situation can't be a help in practice either.
_________________ "Tracy Porter lost his manhood when Marshawn stiff armed him" some dude on youtube.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:52 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15600 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
I'd take our starting 4 DB's over any starting 4 in the league, without question. If you dont have a pass rush thats getting pressure you can have Deion, Revis and Champ Bailey back there and they'll still give up yards.
Now, if i had to choose our whole D or SF's whole D, i'd go with SF.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hedgehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:55 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:37 pm Posts: 462
|
|
The 49ers are just a solid team. They don't beat themselves and they impose their will on the opponents. Hate saying it because I hate them and the band wagon fans they have, but that's a really good football team. I'm going to drink now and hopefully forget I just wrote that.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Starrman44
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:04 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm Posts: 459 Location: Canby, OR
|
JSeahawks wrote: I'd take our starting 4 DB's over any starting 4 in the league, without question. If you dont have a pass rush thats getting pressure you can have Deion, Revis and Champ Bailey back there and they'll still give up yards.
Now, if i had to choose our whole D or SF's whole D, i'd go with SF. I agree with you, J. Well said...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am Posts: 1139
|
|
They are a class above all around, no question. They are one of the best teams in the league.
I think the LoB probably needed a dose of humility. I hope they can bear down and play like they are capable of the rest of the season
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kmedic
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am Posts: 1134 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
JSeahawks wrote: I'd take our starting 4 DB's over any starting 4 in the league, without question. If you dont have a pass rush thats getting pressure you can have Deion, Revis and Champ Bailey back there and they'll still give up yards.
Now, if i had to choose our whole D or SF's whole D, i'd go with SF. I wasn't seeing a whole of pressure on Skelton tonight from the D-line. Frankly, I don't think SF's front four rushes the QB significantly better than our front four (ie. Irvin, Clem, Branch, and Jones). Being an elite secondary requires great discipline. The "Legion of Boom" may be younger and have more "talent" but they aren't as disciplined as SF's secondary, that's for sure. And to me that is just as if not more important.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:19 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am Posts: 5869 Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
The reality is after they sucked for so long, they accumulated lots of top picks and drafted wisely with them.
They have a lot of complimentary pieces that play well together, and let's face it - he's a whiny bitch but Harbaugh coaches them up well.
_________________ @SeahawkGreg
Last edited by FlyingGreg on Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kmedic
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:27 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am Posts: 1134 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
This is true. It seems like 80% of their starting lineup are first rounders, and the rest second rounders. Even their free agent pickups are former first rounders. Ridiculous.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hawkadeus
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:37 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:50 pm Posts: 201
|
|
SF's defense is top to bottom better than ours. That fact allows their secondary to be better. On it's own, I'm not so sure. But it's better in conjunction with the rest of their d.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:41 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm Posts: 995 Location: The 5-0
|
JSeahawks wrote: I'd take our starting 4 DB's over any starting 4 in the league, without question. If you dont have a pass rush thats getting pressure you can have Deion, Revis and Champ Bailey back there and they'll still give up yards.
Now, if i had to choose our whole D or SF's whole D, i'd go with SF. Well said. But I like our situation, long term, better than I do SF's. I say this largely because we (likely) have our QBTF. While SF will eventually be (hopefully) wasting picks trying to find their's ...we will be using our picks to upgrade other positions. I think where SF really kicks our ass is offensive line. That's where we have some catching up to do. Even without upgrading our D, if Wagner continues to progress and we get some Aldon Smith comparable play from Irvin, we will be close to SF's current D, if not equal, IMO.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hawks46
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 7:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm Posts: 1753
|
|
I hope the Detroit game woke them up, and pissed the LoB off.
If we're comparing teams, San Fran has a better OL (they should, they've been working at it longer, and throwing more 1st round picks at it), and a better LB corps.
Thing is, a good LB corps is also part of the secondary on most plays now in the NFL. If your LB corps is weak in coverage, then your secondary is weaker in coverage.
Our LB corps is, right now, weak in coverage. KJ Wright isn't quite fast enough to pay in space, Hill is above average in coverage, and Wagner is still learning, but will probably be pretty good with his speed.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kmedic
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 8:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:36 am Posts: 1134 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Maybe I'm reading into it too much but I didn't like how ET said after the Detroit game that "it should have been a blowout". Maybe it's just his way of coping with defeat but to me it seems that he (and likely his other secondary teammates) has a false sense of how good they really are. It was almost like he was shocked that they got taken to the woodshed like that. They better take a hard look in the mirror this week, hit the reset button, and start earning their stripes again.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Seeker
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:21 pm Posts: 536
|
|
Didn't san fran get stomped out by the vikings, didn't they get beat by the giants at home on a game they had circled on the calendar since training camp? i think 3rd down is a problem, but not one that won't be sured up this week. we'll be fine but this is good perspective.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 9:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm Posts: 2214 Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
i don't buy it, we torched that secondary with our rookie qb, let me correct myself... if not for the 234 dropped passes that game we would have torched that secondary... they are not better than our secondary in my opinion... maybe as good, but not better...and i don't think they are as good..... they were playing john skelton, how'd that secondary do against eli, nuff said....
_________________ On to the Next Episode
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
rlkats
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:03 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue May 15, 2012 7:42 pm Posts: 170
|
|
Hey hawker I remember Niners secondary stopping Detroit and winning. Soooo explain that.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
T-Sizzle
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:56 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am Posts: 1150
|
|
I would take our starting 4DBs all day. Our defense as a whole is a lot younger..... .... experience is valuable.
_________________ "??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk "16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle "OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?"  -ivotuk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:01 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am Posts: 2867
|
rlkats wrote: Hey hawker I remember Niners secondary stopping Detroit and winning. Soooo explain that. And I remember the Seahawks secondary stopping New England and winning.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawkMania
|
Post subject: Re: Our Secondary Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:13 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:17 am Posts: 227
|
-The Glove- wrote: rlkats wrote: Hey hawker I remember Niners secondary stopping Detroit and winning. Soooo explain that. And I remember the Seahawks secondary stopping New England and winning. Exactly. Stafford is no Brady. Detriot got the ball last, chewed up a bunch of clock, and our D did not come up with stop.
_________________ Some mind's are like cement, Mixed up well and Permanently SET!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: AKSeahawker, arghawkfan, Axx, BlueTalon, Cartire, Cinque52, ctown12, CurryStopstheRuns, dbmack, DTexHawk, FlyingGreg, getnasty, Google [Bot], Hachtung, HansGruber, Hawkfish, HawkHack, Hawknballs, Hawks46, HawksnDawgs35, JGfromtheNW, Jville, LymonHawk, mgschwa, NoChops, noflyzone, otter, rj503, RolandDeschain, seahawksTopGear, Seahwkgal, Seeker, Slick, smashmouth59, Sonichellboy, Speakinhawk68, Stephen SeaHawking, The Outfield, TheHawkster, tyshawkfan, VancitySeahawk, Veilside and 164 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|